GUN VIOLENCE IN AMERICA: FOR WHO THE BELL TOLLS NEXT.

Just five people shy of Sandy Hook elementary school mass shooting incident that claimed 26 lives, the Uvalde Texas Robb elementary school mass shooting at 21 victims, now ranks among the highest grossing gun carnage in America. It is sad that such frequent blood spilling has tragically become part of our culture as a society. May the souls of the killed now rest.

25th AMENDMENT: ITS NOW ALL CRICKET.

Madam Speaker Nancy Pelosi once questioned former President Donald John Trump's fitness to remain in office due to what she claimed was his declining mental capacity. Does anyone know what Madam Speaker presently thinks about the incontrovertible case which America is now saddled with? Just curious!

WHO WILL REBUILD UKRAINE?

The West should convert frozen Russian assets, both state's and oligarchs' owned, into a full seizure and set them aside for the future rebuilding of Ukraine. Like the Marshal Plan, call it the Putin Plan.

A HERO IS BORN.

I am staying put. I will not run away and abandon my people. The fight is here in Ukraine. What I need are weapons and ammunitions, not a ride out of town like former Afghanistan President Ashraf Ghani - President Volodymyr Zelensky.

IT IS WHAT IT IS.

"There is too much hate in America because there is too much anger in America." - Trevor Noah.

WORD!

A life without challenges is not a life lived at all. A life lived is a life that has problems, confronts problems, solves problems and then learns from problems. - Tunde Fashola.

NOW, YOU KNOW.

When fishing for love, bait with your heart and not your brain, because you cannot rationalize love. - Mark Twain.

JUST THE FACT.

In our country, you can shoot and kill a nigger, but you better not hurt a gay person’s feelings - Dave Chappelle

DO YOU?.

“What you believe in can only be defined by what you’re willing to risk for it." - Stuart Scheller.

HEDGE YOUR CRISIS.

Never get in bed with a woman whose problems are worse than yours. - Chicago PD.

PROBLEM SOLVED.

'The best way to keep peace is to be ready to destroy evil. If you Pearl Harbor me, I Nagasaki you.' - Ted Nugent.

OUR SHARED HUMANITY.

Empathy is at the heart of who we are as human beings. - Cardinal Matthew Kukah.

WORDS ON MARBLE.

"Birth is agony. Life is hard. Death is cruel." - Japanese pithy.

REPENT OR PERISH - POPE.

Homosexuality is a sin. It is not ordained by God, therefore same sex marriage cannot be blessed by the church - Pope Francis.

CANCEL CULTURE IS CORROSIVE.


FOR SAKE OF COUNTRY.


MAGA LIVES ON: NO RETREAT, NO SURRENDER!

TWITTER IS BORING WITHOUT HIS TWEETS. #RestorePresidentTrump'sTwitterHandle.


WORD.

"If you cannot speak the truth when it matters, then nothing else you says matters.” - Tucker Carlson.

#MeToo MOVEMENT: A BAD NEWS GONE CRAZY.

"To all the women who testified, we may have different truth, but I have a great remorse for all of you. I have great remorse for all of the men and women going through this crisis right now in our country. You know, the movement started basically with me, and I think what happened, you know, I was the first example, and now there are thousands of men who are being accused and a regeneration of things that I think none of us understood. I’m not going to say these aren’t great people. I had wonderful times with these people. I’m just genuinely confused. Men are confused about this issue. We are going through this #MeToo movement crisis right now in this country." - Harvey Weinstein.


RON DELLUMS: UNAPOLOGETICALLY RADICAL.

"If it’s radical to oppose the insanity and cruelty of the Vietnam War, if it’s radical to oppose racism and sexism and all other forms of oppression, if it’s radical to want to alleviate poverty, hunger, disease, homelessness, and other forms of human misery, then I’m proud to be called a radical.” - Ron Vernie Dellums.


WHAT REALLY MATTERS IN LIFE - STEVE JOBS

“I reached the pinnacle of success in the business world. In others’ eyes, my life is an epitome of success. However, aside from work, I have little joy. Non-stop pursuing of wealth will only turn a person into a twisted being, just like me. God gave us the senses to let us feel the love in everyone’s heart, not the illusions brought about by wealth. Memories precipitated by love is the only true riches which will follow you, accompany you, giving you strength and light to go on. The most expensive bed in the world is the sick bed. You can employ someone to drive the car for you, make money for you but you cannot have someone to bear sickness for you. Material things lost can be found. But there is one thing that can never be found when it is lost – Life. Treasure Love for your family, love for your spouse, love for your friends. Treat yourself well. Cherish others.” - SJ

EVIL CANNOT BE TRULY DESTROYED.

"The threat of evil is ever present. We can contain it as long as we stay vigilant, but it can never truly be destroyed. - Lorraine Warren (Annabelle, the movie)


ONLY THE POOR WISH THEY HAD STUFF?

“I’m not that interested in material things. As long as I find a good bed that I can sleep in, that’s enough.” - Nicolas Berggruem, the homeless billionaire.

Sunday, March 30, 2008

THE LYING COUPLE, THE CLINTONS!

At last the world has come to know the secret behind the continued existence of the arranged marriage of convenience between Bill and Hilary Clinton. They are both liars and in their lying streak have crossed the threshold of believability that they do not even know when they are contradicting themselves. It has since been established that lies is the glue that have kept this fairy marriage together despite all the public drama it has exhibited over the years. We will now take a look at some of the known lies the Clintons have sold or attempted to sell to the world over the years since becoming public figures.

The mother of all lies, I did not have sex with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky rushes to the mind whenever the name of the Clintons is mentioned. Here was a sitting president who debased the office of the presidency and the White House by “getting some” in the bathrooms, corridors and behind office desk of the oval office; and on some occasions with Hilary even within the White House - what a dare devil? That Bill was impeached for lying under oath in his feeble attempt to cover up this indiscretion has since become the template for what harm unbridled lying could visit on anyone. Further that Bill later admitted to the sex with Monica Lewinsky saying that “Indeed, I did have a relationship with Ms. Lewinsky that was not appropriate. In fact, it was wrong. It constituted a critical lapse in judgment and a personal failure on my part for which I am solely and completely responsible." did not put much in their column for veracity. This mea culpa was not credible as he only came clean because of the blue dress otherwise it would have been one spin after another as has become their stock in trade. One thing that is blatant with Bill is that on his entire reported sexual escapade, he initially either flatly and adamantly denies that it ever happened or that it was consensual or that the "victim” came unto him. But has never come forth to admit and accept responsibility thereto – all with tacit approval or condoning attitude of Hilary. What a "worthy" pair of lying specimen of mankind the Clintons are?

The rest of William Jefferson Clinton’s experimentation with women is now history but Monica Lewinsky was not the first time that this “Billy goat” was caught with his pants down. Before Monica Lewinsky, there was Jennifer Flowers, Juanita Broaddrick (an Arkansas nursing home operator told NBC's Lisa Myers that she was raped by Clinton in 1978 while volunteering in his then gubernatorial campaign ), Eileen Wellstone (19-year-old English woman who said Clinton sexually assaulted her after she met him at a pub near the Oxford in 1969). In 1972, a 22-year-old woman told campus police at Yale University that she was sexually assaulted by Clinton In 1974, a female student at the University of Arkansas complained that then-law school instructor Bill Clinton tried to prevent her from leaving his office during a conference. She said he groped her and forced his hand inside her blouse. She complained to her faculty advisor who confronted Clinton, but Clinton claimed the student ''came on'' to him. From 1978-1980, during Clinton's first term as governor of Arkansas, state troopers assigned to protect the governor were aware of at least seven complaints from women who said Clinton forced, or attempted to force, himself on them sexually. Carolyn Moffet (a legal secretary in Little Rock in 1979, said she met then-governor Clinton at a political fundraiser and shortly thereafter received an invitation to meet the governor in his hotel room. "I was escorted there by a state trooper. When I went in, he was sitting on a couch, wearing only an undershirt. He pointed at his penis and told me to suck it. I told him I didn't even do that for my boyfriend and he got mad, grabbed my head and shoved it into his lap. I pulled away from him and ran out of the room), Elizabeth Ward (the Miss Arkansas who won the Miss America crown in 1982, told friends she was forced by Clinton to have sex with him shortly after she won her state crown), Paula Corbin Jones (an Arkansas state worker, filed a sexual harassment case against Clinton after an encounter in a Little Rock hotel room where the then-governor exposed himself and demanded oral sex. Clinton settled the case with Jones recently with an $850,000 cash payment) Sandra Allen James (a former Washington, DC, political fundraiser says Presidential candidate-to-be Clinton invited her to his hotel room during a political trip to the nation's capital in 1991, pinned her against the wall and stuck his hand up her dress). Christy Zercher (a flight attendant on Clinton's leased campaign plane in 1992, says Presidential candidate Clinton exposed himself to her, grabbed her breasts and made explicit remarks about oral sex), Kathleen Willey (a White House volunteer, reported that Clinton grabbed her, fondled her breast and pressed her hand against his genitals during an Oval Office meeting in November, 1993). From this chronlogy of Bill's whoring, a developed pattern emerges, and all this women cannot be lying which has since been verified; that a single most strong collaborative evidence exists that Bill Clinton has a penchant for oral sex as could be deduced from all the testimonials of his victims most having some blow job performed or attempted on Bill.

That Hilary stuck to this abuser from late sixties when they first met till date including during the infamous Monica Lewinsky-gate scandal dumbfounded most observers. However recent happenstances has forced discerning mind to conclude that it is probably because these strange odd couple are yoked in lies and have lied to each other so persistently and for so long, on numerous occasions that they have become stuck together in their lies and lying ability and hence live in lie of a supposedly existing marriage.

Hilary lied again about dodging sniper fires in Tuzla Bosnia and was finally exposed as the other lying half of Bill Clinton, the master liar. Everyone that saw the CBS video news coverage of the alleged trip of Hilary to the Balkans will conclude that Hilary’s tale of sniper fire can only be absorbed with a suspension of disbelieve. A further research of Hilary past has proved that this presidential wannabe has not been straightforward in her accounts of what happened but has always painted and embellished her stories in a peculiar prism where she would rather have the story – far from reality. Our research also yielded a cache of other brazen lies told by her and with your kind permission lets go on a little excursion to memory lane of Hilary’s lying through her nose:-

Hilary Clinton claimed that she was named after the late Sir Edmund Hilary of New Zealand – the first man to conquer Mt. Everest but this myth has since been debunked as it was discovered that Hilary Rodham Clinton was named about five years before Sir Edmund Hilary achieved the feat of Mt. Everest which makes Hilary Rodham Clinton either a inveterate liar or a mere name dropper?

Secondly, Hilary Clinton claimed that on 911 that daughter Chelsea was around the grounds zero of the World Trade Center which has since been established to be another lie as Chelsea was woken up by a friend who advised her to tune in the television to witness what evil has descended upon New York City. Another of Hilary Clinton’s lie!

Thirdly, recently released records evidenced Hilary Clintons fervor at making sure NAFTA was passed but during her campaign in Ohio, repeatedly claimed that she fiercely opposed the passage of NAFTA by her husband’s administration. And while accusing the Obama’s campaign of feeding Canadian government a different version of his campaign stump speech of renegotiating NAFTA, it was later proved that it was her campaign that talked to Canada about their double speaks! Who lied? Hilary Clinton again and doing what comes naturally with the Clintons.

Hilary Clinton claimed that she played soccer as part of her inter murals during her high school days but this lie has also been discovered as her high school never had a soccer program during her days in the school. This is quintessential Clintons doing what they do best – bare faced lie!

Hilary Clinton also claimed to have been a Yankees fan all her life but she only recently became a New Yorker, hence debunking this lie of all her life.

That Vincent Foster of the White House Travel’s office allegedly committed suicide was a dummy sold to the world by the Clintons but being found dead in a rental belonging to Hilary leaves much to the discerning mind to decipher the veracity or otherwise of the alleged suicide and that her present campaign chair was seen so soon after Mr. Foster’s death with a pile of papers leaving Vin’s office adds to the thoery of non suicidal death of Mr. Vincent Foster. Was there a cover up as some conspiracy theorists will posit?

That Ron Brown Agricultural Secretary and a rising black man in the Democratic Party establishment mysteriously died in a plane crash while in an official State business trip in the Balkans leaves much to the inquisitive mind; more so since Bill Clinton was caught on camera very hearty, happy, gregarious and loquacious when the news broke that Ron is dead but on noticing the camera feigned sorrow and sadness. This speaks volume and only time will tell. Could this be the reason for their seeming desperation to stop Barack Obama from entering the White House? Could an Obama presidency carry out some inquiry to unravel the circumstances surrounding Ron Brown’s mystery death by plane crash? Could this possible inquiry implicate Bill Clinton and hence the use of Hilary as a cannon fodder to stop Obama one way or another, quoting Hilary’s own words from getting into the WhiteHouse?

Anyway, the good thing about lies is that it does not stand the test of time and sooner than later such lying scumbags are forced to ingloriously swallow hard on their vomit. Hilary Clinton blamed her most recent “misspeak” last week on sleeplessness and yet she is prepared to answer the 3.00AM phone call? When someone particularly a seasoned lawyer cum politician “misspeaks” on a particular issue consistently for about four times within a period of about four months, two possibilities exists:- either that the person is experiencing early stages of alzheimer's disease or some other age related infirmities of the brain or it was a deliberate attempt by that person to hoodwink the people into a preconceived viewpoint. Any other possibility or an in-between attempt at explaining it away will not and does not fly. After all on some of the occasion Hilary spoke about her “bravado” amidst sniper fire she was reading a prepared speech or using a teleprompter or appeared very much rehearsed. So misspeaking is a ruse and being sleep-deprived is a no brainier either. The Clintons lying ability is phenomenal and this we must all concede to them. they are the grand marshals of lying of our times.

Fortunately enough, American people understands these lying cheats very well and are resolute on not giving them another chance at the white house; and not after Bush Jnr have sanitized and disinfected the stains put there by Billy the goat. REALLY NOT THIS TIME AND PROBABLY NEVER IN OUR LIVES! The horrible thing with lying is the implicit arrogant questioning by the liar of the intellect or discerning prowess of the listener to the lies – maybe they are too dumb or unintelligent to detect my speaking on both sides of the mouth. We are not imbeciles and we fully well know when a concerted attempt is being made to pervert the truth; BUT NOT THIS TIME, THE CLINTONS! There is no way in a frozen hell that the Clintons will ever go back to the White House judging from the mood swing of the society as evidenced by the polls and the sooner they realize that impossibility the better for them. But with the Clintons nothing is too infra-dig for them to shy away from so try they will. One thing is however guaranteed – they will FAIL!

In conclusion therefore, while it takes two to tango, it takes lies to keep the Clintons married and together despite all the public drama which unfolds in their alleged marriage and before our eyes daily. Such a lying bimbo as Hilary Clinton must not and should not be allowed into the White House or matter of factly speaking any other public office again and it is the opinion of this blogger that Hilary Clinton be recalled from her Senate seat since she possibly lied herself therein! Such a lying cheat is not deserving of such a respected office as her continued presence in the public eye sends a bad message that it is ok to lie! This is not a pro-moral example and hence should be nipped on the bud now. AWAY WITH THE CLINTONS! NO MORE LIES!

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

OBAMA DELIVERS AGAIN - POWER OF THE SPOKEN WORD!

If only America can get it right this once, we will have our best president ever, come January 2009. He is smart, he is eminently qualified, he is very eloquent, he is very intelligent, he is very knowledgeable, he is smooth, he is brave, he means a lot to so many and he comes to the presidency representing all manners of Americans. His name is Barack Obama!
Let us get over our biases and do right for once by electing Barack Obama as the next president of United States of America come November 2008 - he is the best thing to happen in the American political landscape in recent times. Like a silver bullet, Obama's presidency will once and for all put to an end the bigoted prism with which America has been viewed over the years, so lets cash the rain check, Barack Obama!

Please enjoy the treat which the world were served today by Democratic Party Presidential nominee in the waiting, Barack Obama - happy trails!

Remarks of Senator Barack Obama: 'A More Perfect Union'Philadelphia, PA March 18, 2008As Prepared for Delivery

"We the people, in order to form a more perfect union." Two hundred and twenty one years ago, in a hall that still stands across the street, a group of men gathered and, with these simple words, launched America's improbable experiment in democracy. Farmers and scholars; statesmen and patriots who had traveled across an ocean to escape tyranny and persecution finally made real their declaration of independence at a Philadelphia convention that lasted through the spring of 1787. The document they produced was eventually signed but ultimately unfinished. It was stained by this nation's original sin of slavery, a question that divided the colonies and brought the convention to a stalemate until the founders chose to allow the slave trade to continue for at least twenty more years, and to leave any final resolution to future generations. Of course, the answer to the slavery question was already embedded within our Constitution - a Constitution that had at its very core the ideal of equal citizenship under the law; a Constitution that promised its people liberty, and justice, and a union that could be and should be perfected over time. And yet words on a parchment would not be enough to deliver slaves from bondage, or provide men and women of every color and creed their full rights and obligations as citizens of the United States. What would be needed were Americans in successive generations who were willing to do their part - through protests and struggle, on the streets and in the courts, through a civil war and civil disobedience and always at great risk - to narrow that gap between the promise of our ideals and the reality of their time. This was one of the tasks we set forth at the beginning of this campaign - to continue the long march of those who came before us, a march for a more just, more equal, more free, more caring and more prosperous America. I chose to run for the presidency at this moment in history because I believe deeply that we cannot solve the challenges of our time unless we solve them together - unless we perfect our union by understanding that we may have different stories, but we hold common hopes; that we may not look the same and we may not have come from the same place, but we all want to move in the same direction - towards a better future for our children and our grandchildren. This belief comes from my unyielding faith in the decency and generosity of the American people. But it also comes from my own American story. I am the son of a black man from Kenya and a white woman from Kansas. I was raised with the help of a white grandfather who survived a Depression to serve in Patton's Army during World War II and a white grandmother who worked on a bomber assembly line at Fort Leavenworth while he was overseas. I've gone to some of the best schools in America and lived in one of the world's poorest nations. I am married to a black American who carries within her the blood of slaves and slaveowners - an inheritance we pass on to our two precious daughters. I have brothers, sisters, nieces, nephews, uncles and cousins, of every race and every hue, scattered across three continents, and for as long as I live, I will never forget that in no other country on Earth is my story even possible. It's a story that hasn't made me the most conventional candidate. But it is a story that has seared into my genetic makeup the idea that this nation is more than the sum of its parts - that out of many, we are truly one. Throughout the first year of this campaign, against all predictions to the contrary, we saw how hungry the American people were for this message of unity. Despite the temptation to view my candidacy through a purely racial lens, we won commanding victories in states with some of the whitest populations in the country. In South Carolina, where the Confederate Flag still flies, we built a powerful coalition of African Americans and white Americans. This is not to say that race has not been an issue in the campaign. At various stages in the campaign, some commentators have deemed me either "too black" or "not black enough." We saw racial tensions bubble to the surface during the week before the South Carolina primary. The press has scoured every exit poll for the latest evidence of racial polarization, not just in terms of white and black, but black and brown as well. And yet, it has only been in the last couple of weeks that the discussion of race in this campaign has taken a particularly divisive turn. On one end of the spectrum, we've heard the implication that my candidacy is somehow an exercise in affirmative action; that it's based solely on the desire of wide-eyed liberals to purchase racial reconciliation on the cheap. On the other end, we've heard my former pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, use incendiary language to express views that have the potential not only to widen the racial divide, but views that denigrate both the greatness and the goodness of our nation; that rightly offend white and black alike. I have already condemned, in unequivocal terms, the statements of Reverend Wright that have caused such controversy. For some, nagging questions remain. Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes. Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely - just as I'm sure many of you have heard remarks from your pastors, priests, or rabbis with which you strongly disagreed. But the remarks that have caused this recent firestorm weren't simply controversial. They weren't simply a religious leader's effort to speak out against perceived injustice. Instead, they expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country - a view that sees white racism as endemic, and that elevates what is wrong with America above all that we know is right with America; a view that sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam. As such, Reverend Wright's comments were not only wrong but divisive, divisive at a time when we need unity; racially charged at a time when we need to come together to solve a set of monumental problems - two wars, a terrorist threat, a falling economy, a chronic health care crisis and potentially devastating climate change; problems that are neither black or white or Latino or Asian, but rather problems that confront us all. Given my background, my politics, and my professed values and ideals, there will no doubt be those for whom my statements of condemnation are not enough. Why associate myself with Reverend Wright in the first place, they may ask? Why not join another church? And I confess that if all that I knew of Reverend Wright were the snippets of those sermons that have run in an endless loop on the television and You Tube, or if Trinity United Church of Christ conformed to the caricatures being peddled by some commentators, there is no doubt that I would react in much the same way But the truth is, that isn't all that I know of the man. The man I met more than twenty years ago is a man who helped introduce me to my Christian faith, a man who spoke to me about our obligations to love one another; to care for the sick and lift up the poor. He is a man who served his country as a U.S. Marine; who has studied and lectured at some of the finest universities and seminaries in the country, and who for over thirty years led a church that serves the community by doing God's work here on Earth - by housing the homeless, ministering to the needy, providing day care services and scholarships and prison ministries, and reaching out to those suffering from HIV/AIDS. In my first book, Dreams From My Father, I described the experience of my first service at Trinity: "People began to shout, to rise from their seats and clap and cry out, a forceful wind carrying the reverend's voice up into the rafters....And in that single note - hope! - I heard something else; at the foot of that cross, inside the thousands of churches across the city, I imagined the stories of ordinary black people merging with the stories of David and Goliath, Moses and Pharaoh, the Christians in the lion's den, Ezekiel's field of dry bones. Those stories - of survival, and freedom, and hope - became our story, my story; the blood that had spilled was our blood, the tears our tears; until this black church, on this bright day, seemed once more a vessel carrying the story of a people into future generations and into a larger world. Our trials and triumphs became at once unique and universal, black and more than black; in chronicling our journey, the stories and songs gave us a means to reclaim memories that we didn't need to feel shame about...memories that all people might study and cherish - and with which we could start to rebuild." That has been my experience at Trinity. Like other predominantly black churches across the country, Trinity embodies the black community in its entirety - the doctor and the welfare mom, the model student and the former gang-banger. Like other black churches, Trinity's services are full of raucous laughter and sometimes bawdy humor. They are full of dancing, clapping, screaming and shouting that may seem jarring to the untrained ear. The church contains in full the kindness and cruelty, the fierce intelligence and the shocking ignorance, the struggles and successes, the love and yes, the bitterness and bias that make up the black experience in America. And this helps explain, perhaps, my relationship with Reverend Wright. As imperfect as he may be, he has been like family to me. He strengthened my faith, officiated my wedding, and baptized my children. Not once in my conversations with him have I heard him talk about any ethnic group in derogatory terms, or treat whites with whom he interacted with anything but courtesy and respect. He contains within him the contradictions - the good and the bad - of the community that he has served diligently for so many years. I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother - a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe. These people are a part of me. And they are a part of America, this country that I love. Some will see this as an attempt to justify or excuse comments that are simply inexcusable. I can assure you it is not. I suppose the politically safe thing would be to move on from this episode and just hope that it fades into the woodwork. We can dismiss Reverend Wright as a crank or a demagogue, just as some have dismissed Geraldine Ferraro, in the aftermath of her recent statements, as harboring some deep-seated racial bias. But race is an issue that I believe this nation cannot afford to ignore right now. We would be making the same mistake that Reverend Wright made in his offending sermons about America - to simplify and stereotype and amplify the negative to the point that it distorts reality. The fact is that the comments that have been made and the issues that have surfaced over the last few weeks reflect the complexities of race in this country that we've never really worked through - a part of our union that we have yet to perfect. And if we walk away now, if we simply retreat into our respective corners, we will never be able to come together and solve challenges like health care, or education, or the need to find good jobs for every American. Understanding this reality requires a reminder of how we arrived at this point. As William Faulkner once wrote, "The past isn't dead and buried. In fact, it isn't even past." We do not need to recite here the history of racial injustice in this country. But we do need to remind ourselves that so many of the disparities that exist in the African-American community today can be directly traced to inequalities passed on from an earlier generation that suffered under the brutal legacy of slavery and Jim Crow. Segregated schools were, and are, inferior schools; we still haven't fixed them, fifty years after Brown v. Board of Education, and the inferior education they provided, then and now, helps explain the pervasive achievement gap between today's black and white students. Legalized discrimination - where blacks were prevented, often through violence, from owning property, or loans were not granted to African-American business owners, or black homeowners could not access FHA mortgages, or blacks were excluded from unions, or the police force, or fire departments - meant that black families could not amass any meaningful wealth to bequeath to future generations. That history helps explain the wealth and income gap between black and white, and the concentrated pockets of poverty that persists in so many of today's urban and rural communities. A lack of economic opportunity among black men, and the shame and frustration that came from not being able to provide for one's family, contributed to the erosion of black families - a problem that welfare policies for many years may have worsened. And the lack of basic services in so many urban black neighborhoods - parks for kids to play in, police walking the beat, regular garbage pick-up and building code enforcement - all helped create a cycle of violence, blight and neglect that continue to haunt us. This is the reality in which Reverend Wright and other African-Americans of his generation grew up. They came of age in the late fifties and early sixties, a time when segregation was still the law of the land and opportunity was systematically constricted. What's remarkable is not how many failed in the face of discrimination, but rather how many men and women overcame the odds; how many were able to make a way out of no way for those like me who would come after them. But for all those who scratched and clawed their way to get a piece of the American Dream, there were many who didn't make it - those who were ultimately defeated, in one way or another, by discrimination. That legacy of defeat was passed on to future generations - those young men and increasingly young women who we see standing on street corners or languishing in our prisons, without hope or prospects for the future. Even for those blacks who did make it, questions of race, and racism, continue to define their worldview in fundamental ways. For the men and women of Reverend Wright's generation, the memories of humiliation and doubt and fear have not gone away; nor has the anger and the bitterness of those years. That anger may not get expressed in public, in front of white co-workers or white friends. But it does find voice in the barbershop or around the kitchen table. At times, that anger is exploited by politicians, to gin up votes along racial lines, or to make up for a politician's own failings. And occasionally it finds voice in the church on Sunday morning, in the pulpit and in the pews. The fact that so many people are surprised to hear that anger in some of Reverend Wright's sermons simply reminds us of the old truism that the most segregated hour in American life occurs on Sunday morning. That anger is not always productive; indeed, all too often it distracts attention from solving real problems; it keeps us from squarely facing our own complicity in our condition, and prevents the African-American community from forging the alliances it needs to bring about real change. But the anger is real; it is powerful; and to simply wish it away, to condemn it without understanding its roots, only serves to widen the chasm of misunderstanding that exists between the races. In fact, a similar anger exists within segments of the white community. Most working- and middle-class white Americans don't feel that they have been particularly privileged by their race. Their experience is the immigrant experience - as far as they're concerned, no one's handed them anything, they've built it from scratch. They've worked hard all their lives, many times only to see their jobs shipped overseas or their pension dumped after a lifetime of labor. They are anxious about their futures, and feel their dreams slipping away; in an era of stagnant wages and global competition, opportunity comes to be seen as a zero sum game, in which your dreams come at my expense. So when they are told to bus their children to a school across town; when they hear that an African American is getting an advantage in landing a good job or a spot in a good college because of an injustice that they themselves never committed; when they're told that their fears about crime in urban neighborhoods are somehow prejudiced, resentment builds over time. Like the anger within the black community, these resentments aren't always expressed in polite company. But they have helped shape the political landscape for at least a generation. Anger over welfare and affirmative action helped forge the Reagan Coalition. Politicians routinely exploited fears of crime for their own electoral ends. Talk show hosts and conservative commentators built entire careers unmasking bogus claims of racism while dismissing legitimate discussions of racial injustice and inequality as mere political correctness or reverse racism. Just as black anger often proved counterproductive, so have these white resentments distracted attention from the real culprits of the middle class squeeze - a corporate culture rife with inside dealing, questionable accounting practices, and short-term greed; a Washington dominated by lobbyists and special interests; economic policies that favor the few over the many. And yet, to wish away the resentments of white Americans, to label them as misguided or even racist, without recognizing they are grounded in legitimate concerns - this too widens the racial divide, and blocks the path to understanding. This is where we are right now. It's a racial stalemate we've been stuck in for years. Contrary to the claims of some of my critics, black and white, I have never been so naïve as to believe that we can get beyond our racial divisions in a single election cycle, or with a single candidacy - particularly a candidacy as imperfect as my own. But I have asserted a firm conviction - a conviction rooted in my faith in God and my faith in the American people - that working together we can move beyond some of our old racial wounds, and that in fact we have no choice if we are to continue on the path of a more perfect union. For the African-American community, that path means embracing the burdens of our past without becoming victims of our past. It means continuing to insist on a full measure of justice in every aspect of American life. But it also means binding our particular grievances - for better health care, and better schools, and better jobs - to the larger aspirations of all Americans -- the white woman struggling to break the glass ceiling, the white man whose been laid off, the immigrant trying to feed his family. And it means taking full responsibility for own lives - by demanding more from our fathers, and spending more time with our children, and reading to them, and teaching them that while they may face challenges and discrimination in their own lives, they must never succumb to despair or cynicism; they must always believe that they can write their own destiny. Ironically, this quintessentially American - and yes, conservative - notion of self-help found frequent expression in Reverend Wright's sermons. But what my former pastor too often failed to understand is that embarking on a program of self-help also requires a belief that society can change. The profound mistake of Reverend Wright's sermons is not that he spoke about racism in our society. It's that he spoke as if our society was static; as if no progress has been made; as if this country - a country that has made it possible for one of his own members to run for the highest office in the land and build a coalition of white and black; Latino and Asian, rich and poor, young and old -- is still irrevocably bound to a tragic past. But what we know -- what we have seen - is that America can change. That is the true genius of this nation. What we have already achieved gives us hope - the audacity to hope - for what we can and must achieve tomorrow. In the white community, the path to a more perfect union means acknowledging that what ails the African-American community does not just exist in the minds of black people; that the legacy of discrimination - and current incidents of discrimination, while less overt than in the past - are real and must be addressed. Not just with words, but with deeds - by investing in our schools and our communities; by enforcing our civil rights laws and ensuring fairness in our criminal justice system; by providing this generation with ladders of opportunity that were unavailable for previous generations. It requires all Americans to realize that your dreams do not have to come at the expense of my dreams; that investing in the health, welfare, and education of black and brown and white children will ultimately help all of America prosper. In the end, then, what is called for is nothing more, and nothing less, than what all the world's great religions demand - that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us. Let us be our brother's keeper, Scripture tells us. Let us be our sister's keeper. Let us find that common stake we all have in one another, and let our politics reflect that spirit as well. For we have a choice in this country. We can accept a politics that breeds division, and conflict, and cynicism. We can tackle race only as spectacle - as we did in the OJ trial - or in the wake of tragedy, as we did in the aftermath of Katrina - or as fodder for the nightly news. We can play Reverend Wright's sermons on every channel, every day and talk about them from now until the election, and make the only question in this campaign whether or not the American people think that I somehow believe or sympathize with his most offensive words. We can pounce on some gaffe by a Hillary supporter as evidence that she's playing the race card, or we can speculate on whether white men will all flock to John McCain in the general election regardless of his policies. We can do that. But if we do, I can tell you that in the next election, we'll be talking about some other distraction. And then another one. And then another one. And nothing will change. That is one option. Or, at this moment, in this election, we can come together and say, "Not this time." This time we want to talk about the crumbling schools that are stealing the future of black children and white children and Asian children and Hispanic children and Native American children. This time we want to reject the cynicism that tells us that these kids can't learn; that those kids who don't look like us are somebody else's problem. The children of America are not those kids, they are our kids, and we will not let them fall behind in a 21st century economy. Not this time. This time we want to talk about how the lines in the Emergency Room are filled with whites and blacks and Hispanics who do not have health care; who don't have the power on their own to overcome the special interests in Washington, but who can take them on if we do it together. This time we want to talk about the shuttered mills that once provided a decent life for men and women of every race, and the homes for sale that once belonged to Americans from every religion, every region, every walk of life. This time we want to talk about the fact that the real problem is not that someone who doesn't look like you might take your job; it's that the corporation you work for will ship it overseas for nothing more than a profit. This time we want to talk about the men and women of every color and creed who serve together, and fight together, and bleed together under the same proud flag. We want to talk about how to bring them home from a war that never should've been authorized and never should've been waged, and we want to talk about how we'll show our patriotism by caring for them, and their families, and giving them the benefits they have earned. I would not be running for President if I didn't believe with all my heart that this is what the vast majority of Americans want for this country. This union may never be perfect, but generation after generation has shown that it can always be perfected. And today, whenever I find myself feeling doubtful or cynical about this possibility, what gives me the most hope is the next generation - the young people whose attitudes and beliefs and openness to change have already made history in this election. There is one story in particularly that I'd like to leave you with today - a story I told when I had the great honor of speaking on Dr. King's birthday at his home church, Ebenezer Baptist, in Atlanta. There is a young, twenty-three year old white woman named Ashley Baia who organized for our campaign in Florence, South Carolina. She had been working to organize a mostly African-American community since the beginning of this campaign, and one day she was at a roundtable discussion where everyone went around telling their story and why they were there. And Ashley said that when she was nine years old, her mother got cancer. And because she had to miss days of work, she was let go and lost her health care. They had to file for bankruptcy, and that's when Ashley decided that she had to do something to help her mom. She knew that food was one of their most expensive costs, and so Ashley convinced her mother that what she really liked and really wanted to eat more than anything else was mustard and relish sandwiches. Because that was the cheapest way to eat. She did this for a year until her mom got better, and she told everyone at the roundtable that the reason she joined our campaign was so that she could help the millions of other children in the country who want and need to help their parents too. Now Ashley might have made a different choice. Perhaps somebody told her along the way that the source of her mother's problems were blacks who were on welfare and too lazy to work, or Hispanics who were coming into the country illegally. But she didn't. She sought out allies in her fight against injustice. Anyway, Ashley finishes her story and then goes around the room and asks everyone else why they're supporting the campaign. They all have different stories and reasons. Many bring up a specific issue. And finally they come to this elderly black man who's been sitting there quietly the entire time. And Ashley asks him why he's there. And he does not bring up a specific issue. He does not say health care or the economy. He does not say education or the war. He does not say that he was there because of Barack Obama. He simply says to everyone in the room, "I am here because of Ashley." "I'm here because of Ashley." By itself, that single moment of recognition between that young white girl and that old black man is not enough. It is not enough to give health care to the sick, or jobs to the jobless, or education to our children. But it is where we start. It is where our union grows stronger. And as so many generations have come to realize over the course of the two-hundred and twenty one years since a band of patriots signed that document in Philadelphia, that is where the perfection begins.

Friday, March 14, 2008

In defense of Barack Obama's pastor, Dr. Wright:- THE TRUTH IS ALWAYS BITTER!

DISCLAIMER: When we posted this defense, we acted in what we believed was a need to defend someone who was unnecessarily being targeted just to get at Barack Obama. Since then, it appeared that Rev. Jeremiah Wright instead of quietly disappearing from the scene now acts like someone with a hidden agenda, just like some other supposedly "real" African-Americans, to derail Barack Obama's presidential aspiration due primarily to petty envy and jealousy. Initially they regarded Barack Obama as an outsider and not being black enough for their parochial vision of an "African-American" presidential candidate. But despite all their effort, Barack Obama is soaring like an eagle in his presidential bid. Icheoku has endorsed Barack Obama for president and as a result has assumed the unofficial status of a surrogate for the Obama 08 campaign; henceforth we shall speak in tandem with the campaign's ethos. Presidential candidate Barack Obama today, April 29th, 2008 DENOUNCED Jeremiah Wright and Icheoku concurs. Be that as it may, our earlier defense of Wright is as at the initial attacks on him but does not include his antics at the last National Press Club appearance and henceforth. All visitors are by this disclaimer so informed; and as you read the old article please know that Rev. Wright is now on his own!
Also worth mentioning is that whereas Hilary Clinton said that if she was Barack Obama that she would have left Rev. Wright's church when she did not leave Bill Clinton after Monica Lewinsky scandal; unbeknowst to the world the Clintons had a subsisting relationship with the said Reverend Jeremiah Wright (pictured with Bill above left) but what would you expect of a lying couple after the Bosnia sniper fire story and the I did not have sex with that woman Ms. Lewinsky mother of all lies?
Now our previous existing article "In defense of Barack Obama's pastor ........"
Democratic Party Presidential Nominee in the waiting Barack Obama’s pastor said something and Barack Obama’s head is being called for because Obama attends the church and Obama’s progress with the presidential race must be stopped at all cost. Should all catholic be held liable for the utterances of the pope or bishop or priests or be made responsible for the foibles of some catholic priests who molest their alter boys? Should every American be held responsible for the actions of President Bush including the wrongful war in Iraq, after-all he is our president and we listen to him regularly? Also we elected him twice and by extension tacitly approved of all his actions, utterances and stewardship. How far can this tent be extended to inculpate associates? What genre of liability is this guilty by association? Should the movie industry be held liable for all the violence and profanities in our country today since they pipe that information through their films to our minds on daily basis? This is a case of guilty by association which is over extended and stretched for political gains. The law talks about vicarious liability where a master is responsible for the implied authorized acts of his servant; but the same law never prescribed a form of responsibility for a servant for the acts of his master. The logic is clear and discernible because whereas the master can control his servant the reverse is the case with the servant. Obama is very junior in hierarchy to Pastor Wright and figuratively speaking is a “servant” of Pastor Dr. Wright and in no way should be held responsible for his utterances; and this is the law of vicarious liability.

But conversely Barack Obama is now being held to a standard unbeknownst to the law - that he should exert control over his overlord master, Pastor Wright who has been preaching the gospel as a pastor long before Obama ever arrived at the scene at United Trinity Church of Christ; and had contact with him more so becoming a member thereto. Who is Barack Obama to tell a pastor of a church, which has been in existence long before Obama’s advent unto the scene what he should say or not say? This is conspiracy of the highest order concocted to stop and derail his preeminent campaign; should they succeed, we shall survive but it adds to the well time-honored perception that America has not really moved on from her sordid past of treating one form of humanity as less human. Who knows whom the pastor of Hilary Clinton is? Who knows what church John McCain attends? It is horrifying that this God given opportunity for America to move beyond its bigoted past is nearing evaporation as a result of scared white folks who cannot stand the possibility of losing the last vestige of their authority – political power and by extension economic stranglehold.

However analytically speaking, what did Pastor Wright say that was out of the ordinary or was it just that we would rather sweep them under the carpet and pretend they do not exist or never existed for political expediency? Even as recently as 2004, a flood of biblical proportion swept through New Orleans and the haphazard response of the government was highly suggestive of the discriminatory attitude the blacks face in this country.
Dr. Wright also made reference to Nelson Mandela and apartheid South Africa which apartheid government was propped up by America but this comment fades in importance according to pundits compared to the tirade he made concerning America being a racist nation. None of the talking heads is saying that Nelson Mandela’s experience was a fantasy but would rather it is swept under the carpet rather than have a voice be put on it. According to the template, it should not be brought up not by Pastor Wright not by anybody, ever; so that it will not be known, if it is not known there wouldn’t be any restiveness and we can continue to enjoy our honeymoon. What was the bone here? Was it that the pastor was wrong about the statements or that he should not have brought it up in the first place? Let’s judge a man by the content of his character and the veracity of what he says and not eject him out of the arena of public discourse on really truthful issues we can make improvements upon; but only if it is discussed and understood. The five letter word “SORRY” is all that was needed to assuage old wounds of apartheid instead of the barrage of pontifications that are geared to derail a hurricane of a campaign which is sweeping so many people off the way, including the clawing Hilary Clinton. It is much ado about nothing and the American populace knows better than to associate an impeccable Barack Obama to the truth or lack thereof spoken by his pastor. If you have never walked in the shoes you would not know how it fits, so the "gotcha ya" crowd should just chill out, take a deep breathe and discuss issues that are important to the American people instead of all this diversionary antics to hoodwink people into not doing right this time around!

Secondly, the pastor made allusion to September11 and people called him unpatriotic but that was the reasons adduced by the terrorists as well as the Saudi Prince whose $10million USD donation, Rudy Giuliani rejected. All over the world America’s double standards are sort of gospel and no amount of killing or shouting down can ever take that perception away. What is needed is a round table conference on how we can do better but the profiteers of such topsy-turvy fluidly world would rather maintain the status-quo than tell Americans the real truth because if the problem is solved, their cash-cow would have been slaughtered forever and for good. It is the same with the Jesse Jackson and Rev Al Sharpton civil rights crusade wherein they perpetually harp on the racism in America without advising the African Americans on how to move out of their state of poverty and backbenchers status. Why would they solve the problem if it would cause them some hardship? What was the situation in apartheid South Africa with Nelson Mandela? What was the situation in Israel with the Palestine people? What is the situation with Egypt and Mubarak being in power since 1981 and we are preaching democracy? What is the situation with Shah of Iran and the Iranians when we overthrew their elected government and installed our puppet? What is the situation of Saddam Hussein with the weapons of mass destruction when we supplied same to him while he was fighting Iran? What is the logic of allowing Cuban refugees who touch land to remain in the US while repatriating such Haitians back to their home country? Why would you be willing to supply AIDS drugs to South Africa and ignoring all the pleas for food and one wonders, can a hungry man ever be cured of any illness? What is the situation of Afghanistan and the Russians when we fought and defeated the Russians by proxy of the mullahs? Should the Russians in return join the mullahs in Iraq or Afghanistan to fight us? Is it is Cambodia, Vietnam, the bay of pigs of Cuba, Panama, Nicaragua, even during Nigeria/Biafra civil war. In defense of these actions, the pundits call it protecting Americans interests but the question remains, is this America just the white majority or are the minorities inclusive after all they also die wearing American uniforms. America’s Foreign policy sometimes come in conflict with fairness and I remember vividly the $180million USD bribe that was offered by Halliburton to Nigeria government officials for some LNG contract? What about the incessant oil spillages by American Chevron/Exxon-Mobil oil companies doing business in Africa particularly Nigeria? We are talking about double standards but a popular aphorism has it that what is good for the goose is also good for the gander so America should manifest to the world that we really mean what we say and say what we mean. Being a Pharisees turns a lot of deaf ears among the listening world and this fuels the disdain with which some humanity holds America and this was exactly what Pastor Wright was talking about.

Thirdly, suspicion abound amongst African Americans that the HIV/AIDS virus was invented as an experimental warfare virus and Africans were the chosen guinea pigs to test its efficacy. In as much as this has not been verified, but inferences derivative from past experiences and occurrences adds credence to such fearsome allegation. The Tuskegee airmen story is not a fable – Bill Clinton while a president had to apologize on behalf of the American government for intentionally experimenting and infecting these black airmen with syphilis. With such a backdrop, any other allegation such as inventing HIV/AIDS virus becomes "plausible" especially when it just magically appeared on the scene in the 80’s and the story surrounding Ebola virus equally comes to mind. In South Africa apartheid era, black men were allegedly injected with impotency causing vaccines to gradually decimate the black population and some of them were even fed the lions and this is while the apartheid government was still receiving the backing and support of American government.

Fourth the mega-drama playing out between the Israelis and the Palestine could have long been resolved were there to be any real intention and commitment on the part of America who have come to regard Israel as the 51st State in the union. It is fairness and common sense that will resolve the conflict and not force. A meaningful solution is what is called for – we have several twin cities in America such as Kansas City Missouri and Kansas City Kansas so Jerusalem could at least be shared as the respective political/religious capitals of both Israel and Palestine just for a start. Historically, these two people are from one person (Abraham) and through Ishmael and Isaac gave rise to two of them so who will give way to the other, especially when one of the bone of contention, Jerusalem is what both can empirically lay a valid claim to title to? The important thing is for America to start seeing the Palestine as humans just like the Israelis and deserving of some modicum of decent existence; but to continuously treat them as expendables would only lead to resentment which once in a while manifests itself as violence.

Finally, slavery was not a mere historically fable – no, it did happen and no one has so far apologized for the atrocities of slavery. Few months ago the newly elected Prime Minister of Australia Rudd, apologized for the abominations committed by early Australian settlers and government on the aborigines; yet any talk of reparations or formal apology for slavery has continuously been rebuffed by the American government and no one is expected to be angry about what happened? It is comparable to beating someone up and asking him not to cry – you cannot probate and reprobate at the same time. The American government’s arguments is that slavery was a thing of the past and that we all should move on but wait a minute, were the present crop of white Americans not descendants and beneficiaries of the white slave masters and one begins to ask, what is wrong in a child apologizing for the sins of his father? This issue of slavery and the refusal of the whites to apologize for and pay reparations thereto is one of the root-cause of the "angryness" and resentment among African Americans. Help solve the problem do the right thing, follow the example of Rudd of Australia and at least reduce the tension in the land. Admitted progress has been recorded but there is always room for improvements.

In conclusion therefore, truth will only save us – all the lack of trust and fear in America is a result of people not doing right by and for one another. Admitted America is a great country but it could be greater. America is a good country but it could be better. There is always room for improvements and it starts at a place and could earnestly start with a Barack Obama’s presidency. Let the good old white boys that run and control this country as correctly pointed out by Pastor Wright, please “permit” Barack Obama to achieve what he has worked so hard for – the presidency of United States of America. This and only this will forever put to rest the bigotry in America and finally prove that America has since moved on from its past. To find Barack Obama guilty by association of Rev, Jeremiah Wright is an effort in futility to stick something to the young impeccable man who has come to be known as Teflon OBAMA, period! It is not right; it is not just and we all must prepare ourselves both mentally and emotionally for the seismic shift of power. God’s speed Barack Obama as you trail-braze a milestone as the first black president of America. Let’s keep hope alive.

Thursday, March 6, 2008

A Nigerian is African richest man!

Behold the face of an African Billionaire!
At last, an African has made it to the list of the world’s richest persons in a yearly survey conducted by Forbes, the influential American magazine. With an estimated net worth of $3.3 billion, Nigeria’s industrial magnate, Alhaji Aliko Dangote, is ranked the 334th richest person in the world.He is one of the only two Africans who made the record-breaking list of 1,125 billionaires worth $4.4 trillion – the first time the rich-list would cross into four figures.The other African on the list is South Africa’s gold merchant, Mr. Patrice Motsepe, who is ranked 503 in the world.However, the overall wealthiest person in the world is no longer the Microsoft co-founder, Mr. Bill Gates, who had continuously enjoyed the richest-man label for 13 years.His friend and investment guru, Warren Buffet, is now the richest man in the world with $62 billion – an increase of $10 billion from the previous year. Buffet has enormous investments in Coca-Cola, Procter & Gamble and Tesco, among several others.Although Gates’s fortune soared by $2 billion to $58 billion during the period surveyed, the Mexican communications magnate, Carlos Slim Helu, is ranked second with a net worth of $60 billion, pushing Gates to the third position.Dangote’s source of wealth, described as “inherited and growing” by Forbes, is traced to sugar, flour and cement manufacturing.The magazine wrote: “Nigeria’s first billionaire hit the jackpot when his sugar-production company listed on the Nigerian stock exchange last year… Began career as trader at 21 with loan from his uncle; built his Dangote Group into conglomerate with interests in sugar, flour milling, salt processing, cement manufacturing, textiles, real estate, haulage and oil and gas.”Sources said last night that Dangote may worth more than $3.3 billion as Forbes’ evaluation may not have covered non-quoted companies that are privately owned by the business mogul. Such businesses include Obajana Cement, Dangote Cement, Alheri Engineering, Port Terminal Operations, Transport and Oil & Gas. Sources close to Dangote confimed that when Forbes contacted the billionaire, they were only able to ascertain an estimation of his net worth on the basis of his quoted companies such as Dangote Flour, Dangote Sugar and Benue Cement Company. Forbes was also said to have approached Dangote to feature him on their cover for this billionaire list edition which he politely declined.Speaking to THISDAY on phone from Dubai yesterday, Dangote said he was grateful to God, but was confident that more Nigerians would make the list next year.“The country is moving in the right direction,” he said. “Things are happening. I am very confident that in the years to come, Nigeria alone will boast of 100 billionaires who are entrepreneurs. The signs are very good for Nigeria. Next year, I expect at least five Nigerians to be on the list.”Dangote’s optimism is obviously shared by Forbes which noted that for the first time, the list cuts across the world."The reason for this explosion in wealth is that we're in the midst of a phenomenal global boom," Steve Forbes, Chief Executive of Forbes Magazine, said. "Never before in human history have so many people in so many parts of the world advanced so quickly economically as has happened in recent years."Americans account for 42 per cent of the world's billionaires and 37 per cent of the total wealth, but Forbes noted that those shares are down two and three percentage points, respectively, from last year. And 16 years after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia, with 87 billionaires, is the new No. 2 country behind the US, overtaking Germany, with 59 billionaires, which held the honour for six years, the magazine noted.The world's richest woman is the French L'Oreal chief, Liliane Bettencourt, who is 17th on the list with a net worth of $22.9 billion. Other notable names on the rich-list include US chat-show host, Oprah Winfrey, worth $2.5 billion, property mogul, Donald Trump, $3 billion, and Harry Potter author JK Rowling $1billion.

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

YARADUA'S ELECTION VERDICT '08 - how the tribunal decided!

In an earlier blog posted on January 22, 2008 titled "Nigeria - the way forward", i had articulated the tribunal's verdict but premised the route traveled differently. While suggesting that President Umaru Yaradua of Nigeria fully acknowledge the crass irregularities which brought about his emergence as president, I also opined that he should take responsibility for it and apologise on behalf of his mentor, Aremu Obasanjo so that the country can move on.
Also in another blog titled"American Presidency - the road traveled", I urged the tribunal to annul the election as a pointer that such infradignities as had long held Nigeria down will no longer be tolerated.
However today, February 26. 2008 the Justice Ogembe tribunal ruled to uphold the election and I have read their reasoning in the verdict reached; and it is my believe that there was reasonable basis both in fact and in law for the decision upholding Yaradua's election. The summary of the decision is hereunder posted for your own conclusions. Happy trails!

"In a unanimous verdict of the tribunal on the separate but consolidated petitions, it held that the Buhari and his counterpart from the Action Congress (AC), former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, had failed woefully to prove their claim that the election was flawed since INEC did not conduct it in compliance with the Electoral Act 2006.
The tribunal held that the provisions of Section 146 (1) of the Electoral Act had predicated the conduct of the elections on substantial compliance to the said Electoral Act and not a total compliance to it.
In the lead judgment delivered by Justice Afolabi Fabiyi on the petition filed by Buhari, he expressed the view that assuming that it was persuaded by claims of the petitioner that the electoral body conducted the presidential election in substantial breach of the said Act, the petitioners would still be required to show the (Tribunal) how the breach substantially affected the result of the said election.
"Even if the petitioner was able to prove that the Electoral Act was not substantially complied with by the 1st and 2nd respondents (INEC and Prof. Maurice Iwu), the petitioner will have to prove that the said non-compliance has substantially affected the result of the presidential election. See the case of Buhari Vs Obasanjo (2003). It is my view that the petitioner has failed to lead evidence to prove this claim. Therefore, the issue of non-compliance to the Act is of no moment and it is accordingly resolved against the petitioner." Justice Fabiyi held.
According to Fabiyi, the petitioner failed to lead direct evidence to prove his claim as only direct evidence by witnesses who observed the non-compliance would have helped his claim. He referred parties to the case of Haruna Vs Moddibo to support this claim, where the appellate court held that "where a petitioner makes the issue of non-compliance to the Electoral Act as the basis of his petition, he must lead evidence to show that."
The tribunal held that the claims that the election was fraught with irregularities amounted to no issue as evidence to that effect were led by fact which were not pleaded before the tribunal.
"There is no shred of evidence to prove that elections held at different times, and even if there was, he has not shown how that conferred undue advantage to the 5th and 6th respondents Yar'Adua and Jonathan) to warrant the tribunal to nullify their election," he further held.
On Buhari's contention that Yar'Adua's election should be voided as he was ineligible or incompetent to have contested the said poll in view of the white paper, which indicted them issued by an Administrative Panel of Inquiry set up by the then Governor of Abia State, the tribunal held that it was of no consequence to the validity of the poll.
The tribunal rejected arguments of Yar'Adua and Jonathan's legal team that the whitepaper of the Abia State Administrative Panel of Inquiry, which indicted the duo, was invalid and should be discountenanced.
According to the tribunal, it was valid and therefore acceptable to it in evidence. But pointed out that beyond the admissibility of the tribunal, the question that naturally arises is on how much premium or value it should place on the said white paper, he said the value of the said white paper was diminished by its failure to state in clear terms the reason or basis for the purported indictment of the President and Vice President by the panel.
"Was it stated in the white paper that the 5th and 6th respondents were indicted for fraud as contemplated by Section 137 (1) of the 1999 Constitution? The white paper simply reads that the following persons were found to have done their jobs contrary to their oath of office. Even if the 5th and 6th respondents were indicted for fraud, the Supreme Court has resolved the issue in Amaechi Vs Omehia, whereof Oguntade, Jsc. held that "it is inadmissible to find a person guilty without first making a recourse to a court of law. This issue is therefore of no moment and is accordingly resolved in favour of the 5th and 6th respondents.
According to him, Since Section 137 (1) of the 1999 Constitution had clearly provided that an indictment on the ground of fraud was a compelling point to disallow a candidate from an election, the white paper would have been on a stronger wicket if it had contained that clear ground.
In spite of that position, Fabiyi insisted that even if that was done in the white paper, a plethora of authorities have made it imperative that the indictment would be pronounced on by a court of law before it can act as a bar against Yar'Adua and Jonathan.
On the failure of the INEC to administer the oath of neutrality to the electoral officers, who conducted the elections across the country, he held that the petitioner failed to lead evidence to that effect.
Beyond that, he cited Buhari Vs Obasanjo (2003), where the apex court held that the failure to administer the oath of neutrality was not enough to void the election of Yar'Adua and Jonathan since they could not be the once to blame for that lapse.
Earlier, the tribunal had dismissed the objection raised by Ahamba challenging the authority of the President of the Court of Appeal, Justice Umaru Abdullahi, to issue the Practice Direction 2007, to regulate the filing and prosecution of petitions arising from the elections.
According to the tribunal, Section 239 of the 1999 Constitution confers powers on the Court's President on original jurisdiction as well as appellate jurisdiction to issue the said Practice Direction.
The tribunal had also dismissed the evidence and pleadings of a counsel in Buhari's legal team, Valentine Ikeonu, on the premise that they breached Section 83 of the Evidence Act as well as Section 19 of the Notary Public Act.
While that provision of the Evidence Act prohibits that an affidavit be sworn to before a counsel with interest in a matter, the Notary Public Act forbids any notary to take depositions on a matter.
"Where a court erroneously admits a document, the court upon that realisation has powers to throw it out. Accordingly, the affidavits sworn to by Valentine Ikeonu are hereby struck out", Justice Fabiyi ruled.
"In conclusion, this petition has been plagued with lack of evidence to back up the claims. Accordingly, the petition is hereby dismissed", he ruled.
In the tribunal's verdict on the former Vice President's petition, Justice Fabiyi held that the position of the law was clear that where a petitioner raises a ground of unlawful exclusion, he automatically strips himself of a right to raise other grounds.
"Section 145 of the Electoral Act precludes any other ground once the ground of exclusion as been raised by a petitioner.
The ground of exclusion is mutually exclusive to other grounds", he held.
Reviewing the arguments of the petitioner on the claim of unlawful exclusion, he held that he (Atiku) was approbating and reprobating by claiming in one breath that he was excluded, whereas in another breath, he led witnesses to prove the contrary.
The tribunal wondered how he would admit the presence of his party agents at various polling centres, and yet claim that he was excluded since party agents were allowed only because their parties and candidates where in the race for elective seats.
He therefore held although INEC tried to exclude the petitioner, following the April 16, 2007 ruling of the Supreme Court, INEC published his name".
"The claim of unlawful exclusion canvassed by Atiku hereby fails and is accordingly dismissed."
But the dismissal was however not before the tribunal admitted that based on the legal battles Atiku mounted to ensure that he was allowed to run the Presidential race, his momentum at the campaigns was slowed down.
Fabiyi observed that although Section 145 of the Electoral Act gave the tribunal power to dismiss the petition without looking at any other ground since the ground of "unlawful exclusion" had failed, it (tribunal) would err on the side of caution by examining and resolving other issues.
On the issue of varying time for voting at various centres, he held that "it is immaterial that voting was shifted from 8am to 10am as the seven hours stipulated for the exercise were observed in spite of the shift in time. Besides, the shifting affected all the candidates.
"The petitioner has not shown how the shift in time of the election conferred an undue advantage to Yar'adua and Jonathan to his own detriment", he held.
He said Atiku's complaint that only his parties name was on some ballot papers, he held that it was of no consequence since, according to him, the Supreme Court has held in the Amaechi Versus Omehia case that "votes cast is for the sponsoring political party."
On the controversial results sheets, which included pre-dated, post dated and unsigned result sheets in electronic and manual forms, the jurist held that he would rely on the manually collated sheets, which was unchallenged by any party.
"The result of the manual collation has not been rebutted and it is before the Tribunal and I cannot close my eyes to it", he held.
He cited the case of Al Gore Vs George Bush, which he described as being "persuasive authority" on the question as to whether the counting of the votes in Florida in 2000 should be manually or electronically done.
"The petition fails and is hereby dismissed. In view of the importance of these cases to the evolving democracy in Nigeria.
"I make no order as to cost", he concluded. "


Other panelists including the Chairman of the tribunal, Justice James Ogenyi Ogebe, who has been elevated to the Bench of the apex court agreed with the lead judgment. Ogebe was however not present in court. Other panelists, are Justices Raphael Chikwe Agbo, Abubakar Abdulkadir Jega and Umani Abaji.


.

Saturday, February 23, 2008

AMERICAN PRESIDENCY:- THE ROAD TRAVELED!


A very high ranking Nigeria government official visited the United States of America State of California sometime last summer 2007 shortly after the sordid mess of an “election” conducted by the medicine man of Otta, Aremu Olusegun Obasanjo. This person while answering questions about the charade that took place in Nigeria’s transition parried the question referencing Florida’s hanging chard of 2000 to make a non existence case that no election is perfect. Today the number of voided “elections” therein in Nigeria attests to the mind-numbing madness that took place in Nigeria under OBJ’s supposed transition because no elections really took place and the supposed leaders that emerged were not vetted prior and hence unknown to the people they supposedly govern.

This preamble becomes necessary for a more forensic analytical understanding of the political denudation currently eroding the American political landscape. It is necessary to understand the process that leads to the final results whether in Abuja or Washington DC which explains the rapidity of moving on after elections in the United States as opposed to the lingering bickering which follows every election in Nigeria. In Nigerian, a candidate for office is most always foist on the Nigeria electorates by the powers that be which is akin to the joker of “super delegates” which the Clinton camp is trying shamelessly to employ to steal an otherwise lost nomination. When such happens, the people are left with no choice but to bear the crushing imposition with stoicism praying for the intervention of the almighty or that such an imposed ruler will die in office for a breather. This is so because the supposed head of state or president is not a choice they would ordinarily have made or an option they would have exercised or someone they would have elected or voted for in the first instance. Absence of transparency in the selection process and subsequent election of office holders in Nigeria and Africa by extension is the bane of the societies which constitute perpetual clogs in the wheels of progress therein. These impostors are then preoccupied trying to starve off oppositions and other hound-dogs throughout their term and will have less time to find solutions to the myriad of problems facing their countries. Think of malaria; think of HIV/AIDS; etc.

Nigeria experimented with transparency in elections with OPTION A4 during the regime of Ibrahim Badamosi Babangida which produced Aaree Ona Kakanfo MKO Abiola in 1993 and which explains the loss felt by many a Nigerian when the military junta of Abacha incarcerated him with his ultimate death in the gulag. If only Nigeria could revert to the primary electioneering process such as Option A4; then and only then will a meaningful election take place in that country and perhaps then, Nigerians could have an elected leader who has a real mandate to govern. Were this to be the case prior, maybe all the catastrophic maladies of Aremu Obasanjo presidency would have been averted as he would not have been elected to govern in the first place. Aremu Obasanjo would have fallen victim of the primaries in his home State of Ogun as Yakubu Gowon experienced first hand in his own home State of Plateau wherein a primary school teacher was preferred by the people over him in the primaries. There is no love lost between Obasanjo and his native Ogun State people and he could not have survived the crucible therein. Aremu Obasanjo was a product of the elite powerful people who foist him on Nigerians and they reaped the whirlwind. Obasanjo was a destitute despotic bull in a China shop called Nigeria and it will take a very long time to garner all that he scattered during his ill-fated imposed presidency.

Now to the main subject of this discuss – the American primary electoral system and the phenomenon called BARACK OBAMA! The exploits of Obama in this years’ United States of America presidential primaries is astounding and this is possible because of a system which makes it possible for a hitherto “nobody” to be able to put up such a stellar performance against a former first lady of Arkansas, a former first lady of the United States of America and a United States Senator from the State of New York with a Clinton last name – only in America! And the world stands in awesome admiration, astonished and wondering how we do what we do and rhetorically positing why we are the greatest nation on earth, God bless America!

Primaries make it possible for the real people who in essence own the government to vet their would-be leaders up close and personal before certifying him or her as a fit and proper person to govern them as president cum commander in chief of the almighty United States armed forces. As would anything which properly functions, the process is all inclusive starting with the least of all the fifty states – IOWA to the biggest elephant in the union California as well as far flung territories of Guam and Puerto Rico as well as Americans in Diaspora. This gives every person the senses of belonging and a share of participation in this all important decision of who to trust with the collective interest called United States with all its’ vast purse, powers and influence which is global in nature. Iowa was the first to speak and it would seem that they were correct in their assessment of BARACK OBAMA. Today their message has been heard across the length and breath of America and the message is clear; as was succinctly and very eloquently put while campaigning for Barack Obama in Southern Virginia by the denizen of talk show, our own very Oprah Winfrey, – OBAMA IS THE ONE!

This is what is saintly about the union called United States of America. People have opportunities and when we decide to do good the best is always the result. Hopefully Barrack Obama will be sworn in as the 44th president next January 20, 2009; but if against all odds, it is truncated midway and a different result ensues, at least the people can deal with it and will have some closure in the fact that a contest indeed took place. First it was an open primary for the brave hearts to throw their hats into the ring, there were vetting by the ever inquisitive and very incisive American press as well as hired private investigators, followed by several debates between the candidates and criss-crossing of the entire breath of the union canvassing for the electorates’ support and giving them reasons why they are the best candidate for the office. These candidates are job-seekers applying for the highest office in the land and so are going through necessary interview processes which peradventure takes them through all the stakeholders of the union – we the people! The president is to govern the people so the people should have a choice in his/her emergence. Thus it becomes an absolute meritocracy instead of bequeath as typified by Umaru Yaradua’s emergence in Nigeria wherein Obasanjo single-handedly imposed him on the country. This is an example of crass idiocy which has held the country, Nigeria, down for such a long time and until 26th February 2008, when hopefully the Justice Ogembe election tribunal will do right by and for Nigerians by nullifying the purported “election” of Yaradua, Yaradua remains a de-facto president of Nigeria incapable of mobilizing anybody and real peace amongst the polity called Nigeria will remain an illusion. The seeming peace is like Colin Powel said of the Iraq surge, putting a heavy lid over a boiling pot to stem it from boiling over. Nigeria is as restive as nobody has ever seen – peace of the grave yard is no peace at all. A grenade with its pin on looks as docile but Nigeria must not let the Kenya experience occur. Unlike Kenya, Nigeria has been through a civil war before and since the truce of 1970, disaffection has been smoldering underneath every heart in the country with some people waiting for a pay-back time. Unlike Kenya, Nigeria has abundant oil which could be mortgaged to the Chinese should another war results for their military support including mercenaries to fight a proxy war for the oppressed Niger Delta people. Only fairness can resolve the imbroglio which will then make it possible for an Ijaw or Ishekiri or Urohbo man to aspire for the presidency and guarantee his right to the presidency as well as other juicy positions in the land. This also will ensure that his God-bequeathed resources will not be pillaged without adequate and reasonable compensation.

With these primaries, Americans have had the singular privilege of going into the minds of their would-be president and now can say that they know who is applying for the greatest office in the union and by extension the entire planet earth. There is some closeness, sense of belonging and ownership pride when one knows that he/she participated in choosing who governs him/her. But a situation where an unknown chemistry teacher turned governor of an inconsequential remote State of Kastina is put in charge of a more sophisticated people with much numerical strength and expertise and exposure scattered throughout Nigeria leads to resentment. First who is this man and second how did he come to be their president. Who is he more qualified than to make him a preferred and/or ‘anointed’ candidate? It was a total imposition and people merely tolerate such because the alternative of a midnight visit by henchmen of State Security does not bode well and hence is avoided at the mercy of stupendous loyalty.

Nigeria and Africa in general need to change their ways especially the way the powers that be install a puppet who does not have the mandate of the people to govern. According to “president in the waiting” Barrack Obama, change starts from bottom up and leaders must emerge through a viable political process for the people to be mobilized that they could move the nation forward. Such leaders remain accountable to the people whose sacred mandate they hold in trust knowing that any misadventure with either their resources or freedom would result in immediate recall or voting out of office. But a situation where an “elected” leader is not beholden to the electorates, he sees himself as answerable only to the master that put him in power and hence no obligation to perform while in office. Accountability is a necessary concomitant to consequences but where no consequences exist; there is no deterrent or incentive to do right. Forty-eight years after independence in Nigeria from Britain, there is no adequate running water or electricity or motor-able good roads; no well equipped and staffed acute care centers, salaries are not paid, no viable schools that produce comparable manpower, teachers are perpetually on strike over their backlog salaries; so also are the doctors, the army is owed their salaries as well as the police and the navy, contractors etc. and the United States made it public last week that Nigeria generated the sum of $55Billion USD in oil sales just last year 2007 alone. Translation all these lacking infrastructures could have been put in place – Dubai style, were these very inept imposed leaders answerable to the people or at least care about their legacy. What happened to this money – they ended up in private bank accounts in Geneva while the people are languishing in abject squalor.

In summation therefore, whereas no election is perfect according to this Nigeria official at least there is what is called some semblance of decency in how leaders come about. Show us the path traveled to arrive at the leader – the transparency, openness, and an all accommodating, free for all willing-contestants participation in the electoral process. At the end of the day whoever emerges will be acceptable to the people as proved with MKO Abiola in 1993. Once the road traveled is not so muddled up then the people can deal with whoever finally emerges as their leader. By these primaries, emerged candidates from both parties have been fully vetted as possible presidents which suggest that they are both viable. At this juncture there are technically two acceptable candidates for president and the election in November is just a formality to find out who amongst the two is better and more liked. It then becomes a mere preference by the majority of the people.

If Nigeria adopts this primary process as Option A4 attempted to do, a leader will start emerging in the country that could motivate the people to move the country forward. Until this is done the fight and brute struggle to control the levers of State which sometimes results to deadly consequences shall never cease and the result is that the non-criminals, usually the egg-heads, amongst the society will continue to find respite sojourning in other more civilized geographical entities elsewhere around the globe. Many Nigerians and Africans in general are now so disenchanted and disillusioned with what is going on in their native countries of birth that they have started electing to be buried in the country of their sojourn and would rather even their bodies never be sent back “home” for burial. It is disheartening indeed for a man to denounce the country that gave him birth and this trend is becoming more of an acceptable norm than an abnormally. Maybe a President Barack Obama will be the lighting rod to jump-start Africa into a new dawn. May be a President Obama will help frog-march African “leaders” into what is right and by extension start a renaissance and reorientation of Africa for a new beginning. Godspeed to Barack Obama’s quest as his struggle is our struggle and may God continue to bless his campaign and keep him and Michelle and their two beautiful little darlings safe from the evil ones, in Jesus name, Amen! So speaketh MENIRU!

Friday, February 15, 2008

The idiocy of the Clintons!

If there is any evidence of desperation of the Clintons campaign it is now eminently obvious, as manifested in the choice of words being deployed by this American odd couple – the Clintons! For lawyers, which the Clintons are, to disparage the power of the word or deride a connoisseur of the language is either a crass envy or an attempt to find fault where none exists. This is more so when one remembers that we are coming out of very long tortuous years of a president who is technically speech-impaired and who has some memorable liners such as “misunderestimate”. The very fact that an American president could once again speak English is enough cause for joy and the unprecedented outpouring of support infesting the campaign of BARACK OBAMA. Americans once again feel proud that they could be well represented and that world-leaders instead of tuning off will once again listen through addresses and speeches of an American president. How dare these lawyers, the Clintons, open their dirty mouth to say that talk is cheap or that speech does not put food on the table or gas in the tank? What stock in trade do lawyers possess if not words? Words have moved mountains; words have caused revolutions all over the world; words have changed history and words have caused wars and words have healed etc.
Learned minds all over the world know for a fact that words-smith such as William Shakespeare was not mincing words when Mark Antony caused the plebeians to change cause in Julius Caesar. Words made Winston Churchill one of the greatest leaders of the Great Britain with his ever timeless “never in the history of mankind has so much been owed by so many to so few” speech forever etched in memory. Words made Martin Luther King Jr. bring civil rights to minorities in American especially African Americans with his “I have a dream” speech. Cicero is an orator whose oratorical skills moved the masses. Is it JFK with “think not what your country can do for you” speech or the Ronald Regan “tear down this wall” speech; and even Bill Clinton of yesteryears? Our lord and savior, Jesus Christ exploited words to the best of its potency in the bible and had a grand command of the language. That these Clintons are getting very desperate have signage everywhere; and to such an extent as disparaging BARACK OBAMA’s rhetorical prowess as meaningless. What will they not do?
From a hitherto would-be coronation status to a hyped Super Tuesday to all the trouncing in various polls and the high negatives and now to the final Rudy Giuliani’s Florida strategy; the Clintons have all but lost the nomination. They should do the right thing now and bow out in order to save whatever iota or modicum of decency they may still have left in them. They should throw in the towel honorably and now is the time to stop further hemorrhaging of their standing in the world. The mere fact that OBAMA could run an effective closely-marked campaign against the Clintons decade-tested machine is enough reason for the Clintons to show some respect. President Putin today admonished Hilary as having “no head’ and questioned how a headless Hilary plans to be the president of America? The Clintons should be a sportsman and admit the obvious that Americans do not like them anymore and would rather not institute a pseudo-monarchy by default of a Bush, a Clinton, a Bush and another Clinton? It is not happening and the political denudation is sure to sweep them away barring their sudden wake up from their political slumber to smell the tidal wave currently plowing the political landscape of our dear country. Enough of these Clintons!
This Clinton couple appears to be very shameless as Monica Lewinsky scandal once proved this their peculiar trait to the whole world. Again they are at it but nobody would be hoodwinked by them this time around. They have started shifting the goal-post in the middle of the game - from a gentle-man agreement that Michigan and Florida should be punished, by excluding their votes for disobeying party laid down rules when despite all entreaties not to shift their primary date, they did it anyway; to their now insisting that the votes/delegates be counted. This is even more pathetic when other contestants did not have their names on the ballot and where they did, did not campaign in obedience to party’s instruction. If anybody should be punished for this, Hilary Clinton is the culprit for contravening the party’s disciplinary measures. It is disrespectful of the laws of contract and wherein are the gentleman/ lady in this couple? Tell that to the marines that these votes should be counted. To hell with this couple and it is about time America stand up to these two individuals and call their bluff. If Hilary was winning, would we hear all these rants? It is not only America that is watching this development but the whole world including Iraq and Afghanistan and are waiting to see how all these Clintons’ grandstanding will pan out. Obama is a phenomenon and his gospel of “YES WE CAN” is now permeating the world and becoming the battle-cry of politicians all over the world. It is a very powerful mantra of what is possible; that even a politician in Italy has adopted it as his campaign slogan. Obama should act fast with its patent registration! Can do attitude is the only attitude that moves a nation or group – there is no task impossible for a motivated mind and OBAMA has motivated all of us including those in denial and surely his presidency will be the first in recent times to command the mandate of the whole populace.

Finally the whole world is watching to see if American has moved forward from their age long racism and bigotry. Anything short of swearing in BARACK OBAMA next January 20, 2009 will be interpreted as sabotage. So therefore, BARACK OBAMA must not only win the nomination but must also win the general election as any other thing to the contrary will be misconstrued by the American public as well as the whole wide world as racism. How dare America mortgage their very best because of skin color, they will ask. Such action will force the world to begin to see America in a different prism of do what I say and not what I do. The white majority must therefore not allow this opportunity to slip away but MUST use it to forever silence racism in America by electing BARACK OBAMA, the next president of United States of America. BARACK OBAMA is highly qualified to be our next president – he is very viable, erudite, intelligent, charismatic, handsome, very tall and slender, humane and tough; very articulate, discerning and finally can motivate the people to do greater things. Also he smiles and sincerely too. In fact BARACK OBAMA is everything America is seeking for and needs at this very time in our society. All the Clintons and their attack machine which are shamelessly attacking OBAMA easily forgets that BARACK OBAMA went to Harvard Law School, that he made membership of the board of Harvard Law Review and that he attained the Head/President and Editor in chief of that school’s prestigious law journal. If he was ordinary, he would not go to law school; if he was mediocre Harvard will not admit him; if he was merely good, he will not head the editorial board. In other words, BARACK OBAMA is exceptional. It is not an easy task indeed and being a blackman made it more onerous. An “empty suit” does not attain such heights especially so when that “empty suit” is a blackman and in America. To deny Barack Obama’s eminent qualification for the top job in the land is to deny the obvious. You can only be blind and dumb not to realize the tons of bricks which he has come to represent. It is a morbid hallucination to deny that this candle has been lighted and glowing and will shine into the hearts of many more millions of American minds and for our very own good. A time this opportune has never shown itself in recent past and will be a healing balm not only for the past seven plus years of Bush despondency but also will forever sooth the nightmarish memories of slavery and racism in America. This moment is as rare as phoenix and we must seize it with all our strength and fanatical admiration. Lets’ finally say Bye-Bye to the Clintons and proclaim in one loud thundering voice, in OBAMA we can! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN! YES WE CAN!