MUELLER'S TESTIMONY SHOCKER: MULLER'S REPORT WASN'T HIS.

ICHEOKU says it is abundantly evident from his demeanor, fidgetiness, tutored and stammered labored responses and his overall askance look that Robert Mueller did not read nor wrote the report which goes by his name The Mueller''s Report. Such inference is easily deductible by closely watching his mannerisms and listening to his answers to the questions, particularly as it appertains to the content of his report during his testimony before the United States Congress Judiciary Committee. 

ICHEOKU is emphatic that Robert Mueller did not read the report prior to his appearance at the hearing and couldn't have otherwise written it. He literally did not have a clue about the content of the Mueller Report and frequently asked for a reference page and paragraph, from where he reads to know or "refresh" his recollections before either collaborating it or punting the question. Anyone whose original work is being questioned, would readily recall the vital points and issues which he raised once minded; but not Robert Mueller, thus validating the claim in some quarters that some Democratic Party interest just used him to pursue an objective, which unfortunately bombed. 

Robert Mueller was eagerly answering Democratic Party members' questions or attempting to respond to hem; unlike the Republicans, whose insightful questions he parried off  and did not answer them. Some questions particularly captured ICHEOKU's attention, including how he contradicted himself on Collusion and Conspiracy being synonyms in his report, only to deny it during the hearing. He also failed to answer why an investigation into an alleged Russian meddling in our election only investigated one campaign but not the other. If indeed Mueller was truly determined to conclusively and thoroughly get to the bottom of the Russian meddling in our election in 2016, why did he not also investigate the Hillary Clinton's campaign to see if Russians also intruded in it. Afterall the stated objective of the Mueller Team was to find out if Russia meddled in our election; as they could have easily found an entry door through the Clinton's campaign. But Mueller refused to state why her campaign was not investigated, in order to find out if the Russia's meddling was as in-fact as pervasive as he concluded is still debatable.

Also by stating that he could not "exonerate" the president, Mueller transferred the onus and burden of proving his innocence on the president, which made a mockery of America's criminal law jurisprudence of presumption of innocent until proved guilty. It was not the place of the prosecutor, Robert Mueller, to determine whether or not the president is innocent or guilty of a charge. His job was to find and collect evidence of the president's culpability, which could be used at trial to prove beyond reasonable doubt the president's guilt. But the final decision of guilt still rests with the adjudicator or presiding authority but definitely not the prosecutor. Even such arbiter is still precluded from determining the president's innocence or lack of it; only whether he is guilty of the charge or not. So by Robert Mueller going out of his way to impugn the president with his statement that he could not "exonerate" the president, he embarked on a prosecutorial frolic, which is not known to criminal law and therefore a gross illegality and overreach.

Robert Mueller equally refused to answer why the letter which he wrote against the finding of the Attorney General on his report was deliberately leaked to the media, when his nearly two year long investigation never leaked. Robert Mueller also refused to answer why he charged everybody who "lied" to his investigating team and who are associated with the president, but refused to say why he did not indict those who lied to him, but  who are anti Trump and on the other side. Needless to add that his investigating team were largely composed of anti Trump lawyers and Hillary Clinton's sympathizers. 

Robert Mueller also reached a conclusion on Collusion, part of his report; but failed to similarly also reach a conclusion on the Obstruction, part two of his report; despite his mandate to reach a decision either way, regardless of what the practice of the Department of Justice was. A fair prosecutor would have concluded either that there was no evidence that the president was guilty of Obstruction or that there was, for which the president would have been indicted but for the DOJ guideline. But Robert Mueller was being clever by half in not answering the question as well. 

ICHEOKU says all these established clear evidence of bias or appearance of it on the part of Robert Mueller against the president, which tainted the report he finally came out with. But to Robert Mueller, it does not matter because the president is "below" the law, hence the principles of fair trial did not avail him, hence they were denied to him. As far as Robert Mueller was concerned, the president was expected to first establish his innocence before Mueller could "exonerate" him. What a farcical stranger to criminal prosecution and Mueller was fully aware of it, but did it anyway. ICHEOKU says with this Mueller Report and its attendant testimony, Robert Mueller may have inadvertently written the final chapter of his book of life, because long after he is gone, he will be remembered largely for this infamous Mueller Report. A pitiful way to sign off on his storied legacy. SAD.