NAFISSATOU DIALLO, THE WOMAN DOMINIQUE STRAUSS-KAHN RAPED?

Nafiss pictured left and as she looked then in composite picture right below; and currently in the eye of the storm for allegedly being Monica Lewinsky-ied by a horny-dog Frenchman and former IMF boss named Dominique Strauss-Kahn. She is reportedly a former beauty queen in her native Guinea and was working as a janitor and hotel chambermaid in New York's swanky Hotel Sofitel, when she became famous or rather infamous to some for bringing down the head of the International Monetary Fund. She was violated by a randy and cheap Frenchman head of IMF, who was simply too stingy to pay for sex from a professional sex-provider and opportunistically stole by force what presented itself - a hotel cleaning lady? Icheoku says, provided the alleged is a fact, this guy deserves no mercy and should be shown none as he had all the money in the world to do an Elliot Spitzer or better still just jack-off; but he chose to rather violate an already down and under hotel cleaning woman and this man wanted to be president of France? 

According to the story, Dominique was in his $3000 a day hotel suite's bathroom, probably masturbating himself, when Nafiss came into his suite do her job - cleaning after such men's mess in hotel rooms and suites at Sofitel Hotel, Manhattan New York. Strangely enough, Dominique, not thinking through the consequences of the cliff-jump he was about to make and myopically concerned only about letting off, rushed out from the bathroom naked, exposing himself sexually to Nafiss. He forcibly and without Nafiss consent grabbed her boobs and buttocks as he drew her very close to his fully naked body with a full erect penile phallus? Nafiss broke free and tried to run away but Dominique put chase and in hot pursuit, caught up with her and forcibly trust his phallus inside her mouth wherein he ejaculated immediately. This speedy offloading of Dominique's seminal fluid was highly suggestive of a pervert who was in an advanced stage of masturbation in the bathroom when Nafiss entered his suite; and only cashed in on a presented victim who could have been anyone, to relief himself of his amorous heat of passion or should Icheoku say perversion. Dominique also ripped off Nafiss pantie-hose suggesting that he wanted a real and full penetration of the victims' vaginal recess but for the mother-luck which propelled Nafiss to an escape from Dominique's amorous advances.  

Icheoku says but for Dominique's semen which Nafiss spat out on the rug of the suite's floor, from which police obtained Dominique's DNA, maybe Dominique would still be denying that anything happened? But thankfully enough Nafiss did not swallow, being an amateur; and as a result, Dominique has since qualified and changed his story from the previous "nothing happened" to now "nothing happened that is illegal". Icheoku says there is never a smoke without fire and this French pervert is atypical of so many men and women of power who usually think they can get away with just anything, including violently molesting a hotel chambermaid as is the case with Frenchman Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the former IMF president. Luckily Nafiss is in the United States legally, she has her green card; so let the legal fireworks theatrics of sending away and for a long time, this French society's convulsion begin and begin in all earnest. Icheoku was earlier afraid for Nafiss being deported or outed on her stay in America as a result of this unfortunate incident but thankful she is legal. 

However now comes the heavy lifting for the prosecution as well as the victim-witness in chief - how do they answer to the question or claim that what happened was consensual? Icheoku while literally putting a defense lawyer's hat, would ask the following:- why was the cleaning of a $3000 per night Hotel Sofitel suite so urgent as to be timed to coincide with the very time an executive guest was having his shower or bath? What was the rush in getting this suite ready since the previous registered guest has not yet checked out or demanded for immediate room cleaning service or did he request for that? Secondly, when Nafis saw a naked and flabby Dominique approach why did she not make a dash for the door; afterall and according to her account, she had just entered the suite and so she was most likely still within a very close proximity to the entry or door way to make a quick exit and run from an advancing pervert? Now a none-consenting Nafiss waited there or was she transfixed there until Dominique traversed the distance from the bathroom door to where Nafiss was standing while watching him approach, to grab her boobs and buttocks? Where was her screaming protestation or slap on the cheek of Dominique as is common with women when resentful of a man's conduct or statement? 

Continuing her tale of victim-hood, Nafiss said she escaped or rather broke free of Dominique's choke-hold and still waited near enough or did not run away far enough for an out of his mind Dominique to catch-up with her and then dip his wee-wee into her mouth? Tell that to the marines otherwise where were her bite marks on Dominique's manhood in protest of a forced rendering of a blow-job? Many a girl or woman Icheoku know or have studied over the years would in a heartbeat bite off Dominique's pee-wee under the alleged circumstance; but none of that happened resulting in Dominique reaching an orgasm which presupposed that the mouthing lasted for some time, no matter how fleeting? Then the story gets better; after Dominique relieved himself, Nafiss still stood there and waited for him to start ripping out her pantie-hose? Icheoku says either this woman felt scorned after what consensually happened or she is bad at telling her story as the sequencing and time seems at odds with a scenario of such violated sexual dalliance or liaison? 

Concluding her inept story, Nafiss said she finally broke free and reported the encounter to the hotel's management; but the watching-world were not told if Nafiss was in tears when she came to make the report and whether her mood was rushed or calm; and the manner of making the report? Was Nafiss in control of her self and faculties as she narrated her ordeal in the hands of the rapist Frenchman which tells a great deal about her veracity, as people known to have been sexually molested or violated are always very frantic and hysteric. Did Nafiss follow procedure such as going through her supervisor who then took it upstairs; and before that did Nafiss confide in a friend, colleague, family or any other close pal and who advised her going to the management since the shame and ridicule would many a time persuade many women victims of rape to keep quite and pretend as if nothing happened? Was Nafiss aware or rather mindful when she made her complaint to management that the management might not take kindly to such negative publicity for the swanky hotel viz a viz the caliber of guest that doles out $3000 per night to keep them company and in business? For a person freshly raped, why did she not call 911 immediately but chose to follow procedure of first going to the management? Simply put, Icheoku thinks that the whole account of what transpired is too choreographed to be true - either it was a consensual encounter which bargain fell through or somebody is not stating the incident correctly. 

But that is by the way as Icheoku just decided to play the devil's advocate and momentarily wear the hat of Dominique's defense attorney Braffman. Now, does Icheoku support or in any way condone what happened, nope; as Icheoku hates any form of violence especially to women and children. Moreso sex is readily available and can also be purchased - just ask former New York State Governor and now CNN presenter Elliot Spitzer; so why rob a person what you can buy especially when you are the International Monetary Fund honcho? Icheoku does not get it and suggests that the defense lawyers should explore the insanity angle to their defense as Dominique probably had a momentary blackout and was reasoning through his anus to have embarked on this journey of infamy. Like the rest of the world, Icheoku will keep a date with the story of the trial of the Frenchman in New York, who instead of being a good ambassador to France decided to sexually violate an American resident and for this, Icheoku agrees that Dominique Strauss-Kahn should be sent away and for a long time; provided he committed the said crime. 

As a flip closing remark, Icheoku asks where is Oprah on this - showing her 'O' support for another woman victim of men's chauvinistic-tinged crime? Just asking, since Icheoku believes that Nafissatou Diallo could use some of the big 'O' help in this matter; not only for the sympathy and support of millions of women world-wide; but to help her with her with the jury eventual civil suit against a French pervert named Dominique Strauss-Kahn. Just one more thing, provided that Dominique will not now while on bail have the time and opportunity to commit suicide to avoid further humiliation, Icheoku believes Dominique Strauss-Kahn's bail was appropriate and the conditions/terms quite adequate. However Icheoku disagrees with his sympathizers in France and the New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg who are of the opinion that Dominique should not have been shown looking haggard and unkempt and in shackles; as according to them it is too sensational especially since he has not been proved guilty? Icheoku asks how about thousands of blacks and other minority crime suspects that are paraded daily in orange jumpsuits and leg-irons in addition to body shackles or is Dominique a superior criminal suspect to these other crime suspects? Icheoku does not just don't get it - such sympathy for a sexual molester; but since America nearly sent a president to prison for a sexual dalliance with an intern and it was consensual; a similarly situated Frenchman is toast, moreso when he allegedly took it without the consent of the victim. Just one quick and final thought, has the Frenchman yet registered as a sex molester or better still, rapist?