ATTACK OF THE MANHOOD, ANOTHER WOMAN SEVERS HUSBAND'S PENIS.

Icheoku says it appears the season of revenge of the female is here as women are now attacking without ceasing, men's symbol of masculinity in order to level the playing field? When the world thinks that the southern California USA woman who recently cut off her estranged husband's penile appendage and minced it in a garbage disposal machine has topped it; here comes another vengeful daughter of Eve from Taiwan who decided to cut off her husband's penis and then threw it into a flowing river and have it floated away and possibly eaten by the fishes? Icheoku bemoans this rising Lorena Bobbitt's copycat domestic abuse of the male specie by the ever petulant female, whose idea of now taking vengeance on the man is to incise his object of manhood and thereby "de-man" him? 

It is inexplicable indeed that a spouse could exact such grave bodily harm on her partner and in such callous manner, that one wonders if any penalty is penal enough under the circumstance? It is times like this that Sharia-law somewhat seems "attractive" as the only blood-letting judicial system that could have adequately punished for this crime. The law of Moses could have also similarly punished it adequately by  just cutting off any of the woman's appendages including the labia in retaliation and thereby equalize their pain and suffering. 

If a man cheats and the woman cannot take it, she should just divorce him and walk away. If a man no longer loves a woman and vice versa, they should simply accept the fact that there is a time for everything - a time to be in love and a time to be out of love. Life does not end and would not end; likewise would the sky not come tumbling down just because love has flown out of the window. It is possibly an opportunity for one to get to a better place or no place at all; but remember that before you met the no-longer-in-love spouse, that you had a life and so would you continue to live in his or her absence. Just see him or her as being dead which effectively terminates marital relationship, if that will help you cope or heal faster. The last time Icheoku checked cases of spouses killing themselves because their "beloved" spouse died, except for the fable in Romeo and Juliet, is practically non-existent; so what the heck if he or she is no longer into you? 

It should not be hopelessly the end of the world for the angry spouse if what seemed to be there before is no longer there or was simply a mirage or even a morning dew which has since evaporated. The way out of such hysteric situation is marked "forward" - you have to think and look forward to the next big thing. JUST MOVE ON. But this rapid spreading mutilation of husbands by their Jezebel-wives must stop as nothing under the sun whatsoever is reason enough for such a grave deformation of the man-being.  

Once again Icheoku condemns this 30-year-old Vietnamese woman, Ms Pan, for severing her husband's equipment just because he had an affair with another woman and for his alleged physical abuse of her; an excuse which flies in the face of the available fact that she is a martial arts expert and could have easily defended herself from a near alcoholic invalid's abuse? Worse still she felt no remorse for causing such a grievous bodily injury or rather grave bodily damage, since a man without his equipment is no longer a man in the strict sense of the word and biology? What a shame that a specie reputedly tender and loving have suddenly metamorphosed into such a savagery, ravaging, vengeful, cruel and bloody aliens of very mean and wicked resolve. Did Icheoku hear someone say there is a protective penile armor-guard that could be worn around the waist before going to bed in domestic-abuse charged environments? Or is it simply an idea and if, who has the patent and is it a venture worth investing in?