MICHAEL SHERWIN'S CBS 60 MINUTES INTERVIEW IS A SHAME.

ICHEOKU says it was certainly an effort to remain in the good books of Wokeism and curry favor of the current administration. That would be the only possible explanation and interpretation of the conclusion  reached by this fella regarding the possibility of indicting President Donald John Trump for the January 6th 2021 Capitol riot. What the president said earlier that day at the Save America Rally is in the public domain and requires no other specific knowledge to discern the words uttered by him. There is nothing in the speech that rises to incitement of insurrection or even encouraging mere riot. So, how any knuckle head decided to interpret it or act on it especially to their detriment is strictly their own making and not the president's. 

A rally where more than one million people attended and it is just the words of a few Ohio State soccer moms that are now being weighted against the president. ICHEOKU says really? What percentage of the people who attended the rally are these soccer moms from Ohio anyway or are they so dumb that they cannot distinguish their left from their right. Are they so harebrained that they lack basic understanding of the English language and their judgment so poor that they believed that they were asked to invade the Capitol. They said "We did it because our president said we have to take back out house", but they failed to mention whether the president also told them to do it violently, assuming their interpretation of what the president said holds any water. 

Is it everything these soccer moms were ever asked to do that they did? If somebody had asked them to jump off the cliff or fall into a volcano, would they have obliged? These are fully grown adults, women and mothers; but they want us to believe that they have no functioning thinking faculties of their own to independently rationalize things and you wonder how good mothers they are anyway and how well they are raising their children. But they acted because the president "commanded" it. Very interesting really.

How about the militia members who had their own version and interpretation of what transpired that day that led to the riot. They said that they had to act because because President Donald John Trump was all talk and no action. According to them, "We did what he (Trump) wouldn't do". But this fella did not find their own account of what happened good enough to exculpate the president but finds the Ohio soccer moms' irrational understanding necessarily boding culpability for the president. It is also instructive that 800 people made it inside the Capitol, 400 of which were arrested and charged with 100 more still being investigated. 

Why did only this few number of people out of the millions that attended the rally. If President Donald John Trump had asked for the misbehavior and in a rally attended by more than one million people, why was it only them that heard his "call for violence." Mr Sherwin also admitted that some of the rioters were already at the Capitol building while President Trump was still delivering his speech and you ask yourself why did he then say all the things he said during the interview which are self contradictory and which conflicted so much and did not make any rational sense. 

According to him, President Trump could be still charged for his role in the riot and you ask yourself what role? Has demented people's wrongful interpretation of another person's words now become the new standard for finding the speaker of the words culpable? What happened to directly assessing the speech to see if there was anything in it that amounts to criminality based on a reasonable rational person's understanding and not a probably distorted soccer moms who are trying desperately to wriggle out of their criminal misbehavior. How low could a man go in a desperate quest to curry favor of retention in office by the new administration that he was ready to input idiocy to a black and white issue which requires no special read. 

How could few Ohio soccer moms imbecilic understanding of what the president said now become sufficient to move the needle towards the culpability of the president. Why are the words of the militia group not at the same par in his consideration and conversely be capable of not moving the needle or rather moving it the opposite side towards finding the president fully innocent of all accusations. How could exuberant and possibly inebriated people's ramblings on social media now become the benchmark for finding culpability when it is widely known that so many social media postings are often times exaggerated and are just feel good big talk of some clownish elements who pretend to be what they are not. Is it not possible that they could have talked over their heads in their postings in an attempt to impress their friends with their heroic Washington DC visit of January 6th, 2021. Yet their rantings on Facebook and other social media platform are what this fella now tells the world are the basis for grounding culpability.  

Which government did those rioters even attempted to overthrow on that day since Joe Biden was not in power on January 6th 2021. Was it the President Donald John Trump's government and could the president and his supporters have attempted to overthrow his own government. Even if the rioters had successfully overwhelmed the Capitol and technically "overthrown" the Congress, they still could not have overthrown the United States government because Congress is but one third of the government and not the government. So, could the rioters have attempted what even if they had completed would not have amounted to overthrowing the government? 

At least they did not dispatch some of their colleagues to the Supreme Court and the White House to simultaneously wrestle the judiciary and executive powers in order to actually overthrow the government. So, it does not matter that President Donald John Trump was the reason (magnet) his MAGA supporters thronged to Washington DC on January 6th, 2021; that was never subject to debate as it was obviously and incontrovertibly true? He was the reason for the season as MAGA nation descended on Washington DC to be with their leader and they showed up strongly, but there was no crime in that.

ICHEOKU says it was ridiculousness to Power 2 as nothing else can sufficiently explain what gushed out of this fellas mouth on that CBS 60 Minutes interview. Whether he was even authorized to discuss the ongoing investigations and weigh on such sensitive matters as he did  as a prosecutor is beyond the imagination. How about his words biasing the eventual trier of facts and poisoning some potential jurors mind?  Some of them are certainly interpretable as prejudicial. Did any of his bosses at the Department of Justice sanction and approve the interview and to what degree.

It is sad what the effort to belong and be accepted by the Wokeist crowd is doing to America. Many of the conclusions he reached did not make sense and you wonder why he reached them anyway. The only deducible thing is that he purposely said what he said in order to remain in the good books of the leftist anarchists of America who are demanding the heads of everyone who disagrees with their pedantic wokeism ideology. He wanted to be seen as a member of the anti Trump crazed out rancorous nut jobs of America, period. What he said was idiotic, imbecilic and beneath of someone who parades himself as a lawyer and a United States Attorney for that matter. He should not have gone to some of the places he went on the interview. It is a shame.