JOE BIDEN'S JOB APPROVAL RATING IS BAD: THE NUMBERS DO NOT LIE.

ICHEOKU says what he did in his first address to the nation is akin to harvesting farm produce and taking credit for the bumper harvest without acknowledging the farmer who cleared the field, tilled the land and planted the crops. But American people cannot be deceived twice as they know who the force behind the coronavirus vaccines success is and it is not Joe Biden. It is President Donald John Trump whose Operation Warp Speed led to the resounding success. So, Joe Biden can try all he can to "plagiarize" the success and claim credit for what Trump accomplished as he always likes to do with other people's hard work; but nobody can deceive the American people all the time. He have shamelessly appropriated other people's work products in the past and has no scruples once again doing the same now with the coronavirus vaccines successes. 

This is the same Joe Biden who scoffed at the idea that a vaccine could materialize within such a short period of time and vowed not to take any such a "rushed" vaccine during last year's presidential election campaign, but is now beating his chest as a wonder worker who made the same vaccines possible. Not even a passive mention was made by him of the president who spent his political capital to move mountains to bring these vaccines into fruition. Even the vaccines distribution network which practically remains the same today was put in place by Operation Warp Speed, yet Joe Biden claims credit for everything including the Johnson and Johnson vaccine which has been in the works since last year. But his credibility is suspect and American people knows, the reason they rate him lowly in his job approval.

Majority of American people do not approve of the job which Joe Biden is doing. Only 82% Democrats, 35% Independents and 6% Republicans are in favor while 18% Democrats, 65% Independent and 94% Republicans are disillusioned with him. That is an aggregate total of 123% in favor and 177% against from the 300% sampled across the three voting blocs. Yet he "won" the election but has so quickly fallen out of favor with those who "elected" him to have plummeted to this level just within 50 days in office. If it is this bad despite all the good media coverage which he is getting, imagine what the numbers would have been had the media been as mean to him as they were to President Donald John Trump. But it goes to show that lies have their limitations and that you cannot fool the people all the time. It is sad. 

CHILD SOLDIERS OF AMERICA, REALLY?

ICHEOKU says does America have problem of child soldiers? If 18 year olds are allowed to enter into the country from the Southern border as "unaccompanied minors" and the same age group are recruited into the military as soldiers, what does that say about America? Therefore, it is either there is a political hypocrisy here where those entering the country are not necessarily "minors" or America engages in child soldiers.

PRINCE WILLIAM DENOUNCES RACISM.

ICHEOKU says now that the future King of England Prince William, the Duke of Cambridge, has denounced racism and stated that the royal family is not racist, who then is the person who Megan Markle and Prince Harry complained questioned the skin color of their son, Archie? Recall that the restless couple ruled out the Queen and Prince Philip from list of possible suspects, thus leaving Prince Charles as the only man now left standing under the cloud of suspicion. Will Prince Charles ever speak to clear his name or is he the whodunnit culprit. The clock is ticking.

SHOUT OUT TO ALL NURSES OUT THERE: THEY ROCK!

ICHEOKU says remember to thank the next nurse you meet or see as they have sacrificed so much in the fight against COVID-19 pandemic in addition to all the good work they do nursing us back to health when we fall sick. So far, 3000 of them have laid down their lives battling the Chinese Wuhan coronavirus pandemic and without their hard work the toll would have been unbearably too high and much higher than what they are currently. Kudos to all you fellas in blue. We love our nurses.

MEGHAN MARKLE: WHAT ELSE DID SHE LIE ABOUT?

ICHEOKU says anyone supporting the renegade royals, Meghan and Harry, in the current face off between them and the monarchy are just doing it with hope that they will see a bloody fight between them. It is the thing with humans and they love to watch a gory bloody fight erupt between two gladiators, the reason they are goading Meghan on by appearing to support her as she trashed the British institution. These people are not interested in whether she made up the story, embellished it or totally told a complete lie. They want to instigate a war between both parties in order to bring down the monarchy or at least ridicule them into disrepute. 

But they refused to consider the motivation of the Hollywood actress who covets the limelight and is addicted to the spotlight and possibly wanted to get even with the monarchy for denying her that by curtailing her excesses. She was livid that her voice was silenced and that she no longer gets all the attention and front page befitting of a Hollywood actress who married a real life prince. For her it is all about light, camera and action and she was not ready to role play for anyone or take a subsumed position behind those royals who are higher than her in ranking including Kate Middleton. She made her calculation and rebelled accordingly and then followed it up with the Oprah interview to thrash a family that welcomed her with open arms. That she did not tell truth and at best told only her own version of truth is also obvious.

Meghan Markle said that she called her father and urged him not to do an interview with British tabloid before her wedding. That she repeatedly demanded to know whether he has already granted them the interview so that she can intervene to prevent them from publishing anything that would mess up her wedding. She said that her father assured her that he did not grant any interview so she relaxed and did not proceed to muscle the tabloid to prevent any publication that will show her in bad light. But she claimed in the interview that she was scared for her life and that the palace did not protect her and allowed the British tabloid media to run her over like a roadkill. Query, if she could have intervened to prevent the publication of her father's interview as she stated, why then did she not prevent the publication of stories which she complained that were injurious to her hurt feelings? A "naive" little girl which she played in the interview but who could influence the publication of her father's interview. Really? So which part of the two stories is the lie since both cannot be true.

ICHEOKU says is emphatic that the Meghan's account of her experiences in the royal family will not pass the smell test and if she were put through a lie detector test, will fail woefully. Imagine a Hollywood actress complaining that she was turned into a commodity by the British media who used stories about her to sell their newspapers and magazines as well as overall air time. According to Harry's account, he did not like that the British media "commoditized" his wife and were not mindful that she is a human being. How again does Meghan make her money if not through being sold as an actress to a world of her fans who tune in to watch her put up acts? So, if she could commoditize herself and make millions from doing it, why can't others cash in on her fame and also participate in the commoditizing business as well. Is her complaint that the British tabloid were not sharing their profit with her and if not, did she ever consider copyrighting herself to prevent such peeling off of profits. So again which part of the story is true, that she is not a commodity or that others profited from her being a commodity?

She also claimed that her son Archie was denied a royal title of Prince because he is colored and not a full blooded pure white bred. But she deliberately forgot or failed to say that a 1917 edict by King George streamlined those descendants who are qualified to be named princes and princess and that her Archie was part of the excluded descendants. That it was a long running position which did not suddenly come into being just because a black woman married into the monarchy and begot a black son named Archie who cannot become a prince. But she intentionally made it to appear that her son Archie was specifically targeted and denied a title which is rightfully his in order to trigger resentment of the monarchy by the public as a racist institution which hates black people. A well intentioned Meghan would not have brought up the issue during the interview but her entire action was a planned attack on the monarchy, hence she did not care about the derivative innuendos and inferences and she cashed in on it. So, again which one is the truth, that Archie was denied a royal title or that Archie was not within the contemplated offsprings to be so designated?

Meghan's half sister Samantha Markle has come out to debunk Meghan's claim that she hardly knew her as according to Meghan they did not grow up together, neither have they been in close contact in a long time and that Samantha changed her last name back to Markle just recently because Meghan met and married a prince. Samantha provided pictures, documents and other photographic evidence to back her account of extensive relationship with Meghan including photographs of them as recently as 2008 during her graduation as well as childhood pictures which the two took together and change of name certificate. Meanwhile Meghan did not produce any such evidence to back up her salacious account of what went down in the palace and other experiences which she complained about; yet they want everybody to believe her just because she is a woman and women ought to be believed. ICHEOKU says but Samantha Markle too is a woman and she backed her own story with evidence which means that she should be believed doubly. So, again which part is true, that Meghan and Samantha hardly know each other or that Meghan was dodgy with her story?

It appears that Piers Morgan was right afterall in not believing Meghan Markle particularly her "suicidal thought" story as evidence shows that she lied about some parts of her story and could have lied about all of them. She is a tough mean gal who grew up in Crenshaw/Compton areas of Los Angeles, tough neighborhoods and she have seen it all and enough not to be easily intimidated nor overwhelmed by palace intrigues, to the extent that she would have contemplated taking her own life. ICHEOKU is not saying that it did not happen but that it is also possible that it did not happen. She is a manipulator extraordinaire, an actress, who can wangle her way through any situation and who even threw her family overboard in her desperate quest to marry a prince. She did not allow her father to attend her wedding and made another man to walk her down the aisle, an honor reserved for fathers. Even her half sister was not invited as well. Anyone who could do such is simply capable of just anything.

The only rational conclusion in Meghan Markle's dramatic exposition with Oprah Winfrey is that she played the racial and mental health issue cards just to get even with the British monarchy. Who doesn't know for example that a child born by a black woman for a white man will not be white but colored. So how dumb must the palace be to be otherwise anxious about the color of Archie when it is an already known fact that he will be off white at best. Anyway, lets hope the matter is now rested with the palace's response and that the intended bloodbath has been averted. It was a shame that Meghan Markle went this far to disparage a family who welcomed her into their midst with open arms and she was callous in disrupting a hitherto healthy relationship between Prince Harry and his brother Prince William. What Lady Di put together, Meghan ruthlessly put asunder. It is pitifully sad. 

PIERS MORGAN SPOKE FOR MILLIONS OF PEOPLE.

"On Monday I said I didn't believe Meghan Markle in her Oprah interview. I have had time to reflect on this opinion and I still don't believe her. If you did or still does, its OK. Freedom of speech is a hill I am happy to die on. Thanks for all the love and hate. I am off to spend more times with my opinions." - Piers Morgan

With the statement Piers Morgan vows to die and be buried with his conviction. It is the right thing to do and it makes him a man of character, who has a core and also conviction. ICHEOKU strongly believes that what is good for the goose should also be good for the gander and that free speech should not be predicated on the lips or fingers making it. It should be applied universally and in uniformity; or not applied at all. What Meghan Markle said about the royal palace was outrageous to so many people especially the British people whose Queen was disparaged by her. So, why was she not canceled? But Piers Morgan who rose in defense of the royal household was canceled as being "outrageous" for not believing Meghan Markle. 

ICHEOKU says what is the standard of judgment here and whose sensibilities governs the action on cancellation. It was the same reason Socrates was forced to drink cyanid because he posited that the earth was round, which to the thought process prevalent in those years, was a sacrilege. They demanded that he retract what he said and revert to the ordered opinion in the society that the earth was flat, but convinced on his opinion he refused and drank the poison instead. Several centuries later he was proved right and those who demanded he changed his opinion were proved the wrong fellas, admitted the damage they caused him was irreversible. 

ICHEOKU says supports and stands with Piers Morgan fully and completely because he is a man who stands by his conviction and so should everyone else be allowed to hold firm to what they believe in and not be forced to believe what others believe just to satisfy the blood lust of some vengeful individuals. Piers Morgan spoke for so many millions of people especially those without formidable voice. To hell with cancel culture. 

PIERS MORGAN CANCELED: FORCED TO RESIGN BECAUSE OF MEGHAN MARKLE.

ICHEOKU says all it took was a mere 41,000 complaints about a remark that he didn't believe a word about Meghan Markle's claim that she entertained suicidal thoughts because of her racist experience while in the royal household for Piers Morgan's 6 years running gig on British ITV to be over. This is in a country of about 68 million people and a television program that has millions of viewership but British television regulating authority launched an investigation into what was said based on this negligible number of busy bodies, forcing him to resign rather than be humiliated because of his conviction. What exactly is the percentage of 41,000 people out of 68 million population, yet they are allowed them the impetus to control what somebody can freely say on a British television.

ICHEOKU says welcome to Cancel Culture Club British chapter as the American Cancel Culture buzzards have successfully infiltrated the United Kingdom and their complaints, which were probably largely bots, successfully took down one of the foremost personality on British television. With this recorded success, they will only become more emboldened as they seek other targets to destroy and bring down. As it appears now, nobody is allowed to hold contrary opinion or viewpoint on issues anymore and it is either they conform or they are doomed. Piers Morgan dared to have an independent mind by refusing to comply and his job was gone. Meghan Markle said it, she is a woman and women should be believed is their now universal controlling standard and if you dare fall out line, challenge or question anything she said you are gone; and it took just 41,000 complaints for them to launch an investigation about what was said. 

So what if Meghan Markle lied, exaggerated, embellished or even totally made up what she said. Also, even if what she said are true, are people no longer allowed to entertain their own doubts about things other people said, especially in this day and age when so much lies are being told everywhere as seen in some people coming back to recant and apologize for lies which they told, some with far reaching consequences such as resulting death. A French school girl just came out to retract her allegation that her teacher said something bad about Muslim Prophet Mohammed for which the teacher was murdered by an Islamist. As it turned out the student was not even in school the day she claimed her teacher said what she claimed he said  So, if this girl lied why couldn't Meghan Markle too lie, assuming her claims are lies; or is there now a new standard which says that Meghan is infallible and above reproach and whatever comes out of her mouth is the gospel truth. 

If Meghan Markle can have her own truth as expressed in the interview, why can't Piers Morgan or any other person including ICHEOKU be allowed the same level of liberty to have and express their own truth or opinion. Why was what Meghan Markle said not first subjected to the same level of scrutiny of an investigation before being believed. But no, it is Piers Morgan's expression of doubt about what Meghan Markle said that must be investigated as he was not supposed to doubt women because women are automatically believed and Meghan Markle is a woman. Meanwhile Meghan Markle has not adduced or produced any incontrovertible evidence in support of her allegations which created the room for doubts. Her allegations were just her own recollections and the monarchy has come out to say that other version possibly exists. 

This woman is a professional actress for crying out loud and she put an award wining performance during the interview and as far as some people are concerned, she could have been acting a script throughout the interview. It is an honest human disposition to question such performance and nobody should be punished or investigated for reacting to her claims and however they saw fit. People regularly lie about so many life situations including being raped when the person they accused of raping them was never even around the place which place they claimed the rape took place. For example, so many cases of prison sentences have been reversed over the years in America as wrongly convicted individuals were later proved innocent because their conviction was based on false testimony. 

So, Meghan claimed that she had mental breakdown and was suicidal but was not given help in Britain, but she did not tell the watching world during her Oprah interview whether she has since sought therapy upon regaining her freedom in America or did her traumatic experience suddenly dissipate following her great escape from the royal household hostage situation. Everything in life is contextual, the reason there is white and black and of course grey. There is also day and night as well as dusk and dawn; all these variants because things are not always what they seem including certain conclusions and inferences. It is therefore healthy to hold opinions and debate issues no matter how repugnant they may sound of appear to others. It is what oils society particularly mental health and makes us human beings.

What then is the essence of developed thinking if everybody must accept things unquestionably just because of who said them. Why again do lawyers, legislators and advocates still have jobs if debating issues are no longer allowed or tolerated in societies. Why does a coin still have two faces if not in continuation of humanity's tolerance for different perspectives including the right to reject an argument or a position taken as not true and/or correct. Why must one side to a debate always be treated with special deference while the contrarian is scorned and punished. Is this how civilization will continue to thrive or is it a harbinger of damnation awaiting any society that becomes atrophied due to lack of innovation which usually comes from holding different thinking. Such a morphing tunnel-vision thinking society is doomed and this is why the Cancel Culture movement which is forcing this on societies must be stopped now or they will kill civilization.

JILL AND JOE BIDEN: WHAT TYPE OF PARENTS ARE THEY ANYWAY?

ICHEOKU says Hunter Biden turned out a crack head and now their dogs bite people in the White House. Their dog also "tripped" Joe Biden and messed up his foot during the last campaign. Now, does these say a thing or two about the Bidens and how good they are at raising people and dogs? Imagine if President Donald John Trump had dogs and they bite people in the White House, what the mean media will do to him. But it is Joe Biden and all his sins are gratuitously forgiven. What a farce. But now that those vicious dogs have been banished from the White House, will some people soon follow the exit and return back to their dogs in Delaware where they really belong? Just curious.

HOUSTON: WE HAVE A PROBLEM.

ICHEOKU says during the years of the Cold War and right up to the last leader of the Soviet Union Mikhail Gorbachev and culminating into the first president of Russia Boris Yeltsin, America used to worry so much about the health and state of mental wellbeing of USSR leaders and Russian president. America was always anxious to know what was going on inside the Union of Socialist Soviet Republics, particularly the status of its leadership. But the secretive USSR were not always forthcoming with the information and the world remained in the dark about the real status of the leadership in Kremlin while America continuously deploy clandestine operations to find out. It heightened the anxiety in the world as nobody knew exactly what was going on at any point in time. 

The Cold War was won by the West and several decades later, it is now America that the world is worried about its leader and wondering what is going on in the White House. President Donald John Trump they feared was too erratic and could blow things up; but now who they see in the White House does not give them any comfort whatsoever and at best, a minuscule of comfort as only a 'dead man walking and mentally fatigued out zombie figure could muster. They see in him that the once feisty boy from Scranton who later turned into the Amtrak riding Senator from the Great State of Delaware is since long gone and no longer available and that only his apparition now occupies the White House. 

It is obvious that Joe Biden is greatly diminished and minimized by age, His mental and physical agilities have degenerated so much that his minders cannot trust him enough to allow him to do even one interview, take even one question from reporters and/or conduct even one press conference ever since taking office. But they want American people to trust Joe Biden to run the country and do a good job running it. ICHEOKU says, seriously? #ForHowLongWillTheFatLieSubsist.

MEGHAN MARKLE'S OPRAH INTERVIEW: AN ATTACK ON THE BRITISH MONARCHY.

ICHEOKU says she could have easily made up the whole story and flawlessly executed it being the consummate professional actress she is and guided by the forces behind her rebellion. They want the world to believe their farcical tale in the portico simply because Meghan Markle told it, she is a woman and women should be believed, using the fickle standard of the #MeToo lunatics fringe. Meanwhile they did not reach out to the British monarchy for their side of the story and there was no other independent collaborating evidence to back up the story as verified, but they went public with it anyway. 

They are driven with their maniacal quest to tarnish the monarchy and they had no scruples in dishing out rehearsed lies through the conniving and contriving Meghan, a willing participant in the scheme to take it to the monarchy. How any sane reasonable person can believe that anybody in the palace questioned baby Archie's skin color, fully aware that his mother Meghan is black and her offspring is naturally going to be somewhat off white and not a snow white, white boy is shocking to say the least. But they rehearsed their lines very well and following a Hollywood opinion sampling knew exactly the type of accusations to level and how riveting they will be and then went to town with it. 

First they swarmed her wedding from America. Then they encouraged her to begin her rebellion against the monarchy before finally bolting away back to America and taking a British prince and his son along. Now she is accusing the same people who welcomed her into their royal family, approved a very lavish princely wedding for her as well as volunteered the future King of England to step in to give her hand away in marriage to his son, of being racists. ICHEOKU says to get to the root of the matter, we must follow the money. Who is funding Meghan Markle? Some American deep pockets. Who gave them a free accommodation and security details in America before they got their own place? Tyler Perry, a black man. Whose neighborhood did they move into and at her instigation and encouragement? Oprah Winfrey, a black woman. Whose company have they been keeping mostly since moving back to America? Mostly black Hollywood elites.

Therefore it is safe to say that it is black equity crusaders that are working overtime here in  attacking the British monarchy using Meghan Markle as their front person. It is their attempt to dilute the monarchy and force it to dissolve into a mixed race institution. These anarchists have decided to go after the more than one thousand year institution and force it to liberalize and diverse by reducing its whiteness. They want some blackness inside the British monarchy and if they cannot get it, just to destroy it or tarnish its image as a whites only racist institution. It is the cancel culture cancer that is eating up America that they are trying to permeate into the British monarchy and destroy it or at least demean it by raising rehearsed salacious accusations which will put the palace in bad light. 

From the general circumstances, the various actors involved in this campaign are primarily activists and it shows that the Black Lives Matter organization is possibly involved in it too. They want to ensure equitable blackness in the monarchy or tarnish its image if they don't succeed. They are mad that the monarchy is too white and have largely remained so for centuries as the anchor point of white supremacy, being a whites only institution, and they want it changed and have found a willing accomplice in Meghan Markle. They want to democratize the British monarchy and are pulling all stops to make it happen. Meghan could have easily made up the whole story or exaggerated parts thereof to burnish her story and make herself a more sympathetic victim figure. Just watching her eyes and body movement shows a professional at work and she worked it so well that many people believe her story as plausible. 

But ICHEOKU is not buying into the malarkey as they are too well scripted, choreographed and rehearsed to be true. Even if the palace entertained the idea that her son will not be as white, they wouldn't have voiced it out to her hearing, fully aware how it will rub her and her husband on the wrong side. Also, even the way Oprah framed some of her questions suggests that there was a concert to arrive at a preferred destination answers which will increase viewership of the interview and with it an increased revenue yield. For example, Oprah asked Meghan a very leading question "were you thinking of harming yourself", instead of just asking her "what was your state of mind" or "what was she thinking at that point in time?" 

ICHEOKU says from all indications, the interview was not organic as Oprah wants the world to believe. It is a product of several rehearsals, preparations and auditioning before the last stage show was put on CBS on Sunday. It is Hollywood produced show and they sampled each question and rehearsed every answer to see what will get the most bang before finally deciding on which ones to settle with that will be most impactful. They purposely targeted the monarchy and they went full throttle to land their knockout punches but the British society is smarter than that and they will not accept the bullying of their monarchy bt two rascals and their American collaborators. There is no corroborating evidence and it largely remains a Meghan said this that the monarchy did that; may be the monarchy will respond but they have not so far, assuming they will ever honor the restive Meghan and their prodigal son with the dignity of a response. 

Prince Harry complained that his daddy did not come to their rescue but he never said he consulted his daddy nor sought his opinion or took his advice first before he brought Meghan home to the royal family. So as a fully grown man who can take decision about who will marry regardless of family input, he should have also taken charge of the developing situation without bothering anyone and now whining about the lack of care by his daddy. Action begets reaction and it is possible that Harry could have said something definitive such as "you people must hands off my wife matters" or even acted out angrily in such a way that made his daddy to decide to leave him and his wife alone for fear of being accused of not wanting his son to marry a black actress who is older than him and who was previously once married and divorced. 

Yes, Prince Charles could have been a victim of walking a fine thin line who was forced to stay away or aloof in order to avoid any insinuation of racism against Meghan or the misinterpretation of his words and actions owe to the peculiar situation which was brought upon the royal household by Prince Harry in marrying Meghan Markle. Unfortunately, he ended up now still being accused of being a racist who questioned the color of the skin of his grandson Archie; a case of one running away from the frying pan of possible accusation of racism into the fire of being accused of being a racist who was disturbed about the color of his grandson and voiced his concerns out. So far, Prince Harry has absolved only his grand parents but not his father or brother William, thus leaving both as the possible suspects who questioned Archie's skin color. But it is obvious that it was Charles who could have done it, if it was true since it only takes some educated deductions to figure that out. 

Anyway, British people must see the attacks for what they are. It is directed at the British monarchy and they want to take it down. It is cancel culture creeping across the Atlantic and what better way to make a thunderous statement than to take on the symbol of British greatness and the beacon of white people. Therefore British people must rise up to defend their age old institution and protect it from the cancerous American cancel culture which can morph into any form and in this case, Meghan Markle. They are possessed by satan and they want it all. These  lunatics want to destroy anything they cannot lay their hands on and they have no regard for institutions including things that represents them. They see Western civilization as dangerous and they want to bring it down. This time, it is the British monarchy that is in their crosshairs and they are coming for it and they will not stop until they are stopped themselves. Enough of the metastasizing cancel culture pandemic. #DefendTheMonarchy. 

PRINCE HARRY GETS NO APOLOGY: NONE IS DUE NOR COMING.

ICHEOKU says apologize for what, Prince Harry? For a self inflicted emotional distress caused when he brought home to the royal household for marriage a woman who is older than him, who was not a virgin, who was previously married and previously divorced, who is from a broken home, a commoner who is not steeped in mannerism and etiquette befitting of a prince's wife and a princess of England; and she is black! 

What was Prince Harry thinking in the first place or was he just trying to prove that he can be radically more rebellious after his Las Vegas nudity and romping incident was forgiven by Her Majesty. Haven't the royal family tolerated enough already of this prodigal rascal of a son? Who was supposed to be doing the apologizing here Prince Harry, assuming any apology is deemed needed, due and pending? 

This whining of demand for an apology is simply adding insult to injury and must stop. The attempted reverse psychological warfare cannot and will not be tolerated. This is a fella who has caused so much pain and trouble in the royal household already by repeatedly veering off the narrow straight line required of his royal birth and here he is trying to pass the buck of responsibility once again by playing the victimhood card. Enough, Prince Harry. #GetYourSenseBackHarry. 

MEGHAN MARKLE AND PRINCE HARRY: DIVORCE IS IN THEIR FUTURE.

ICHEOKU says Prince Harry is definitely hurting for abandoning his family and absconding from his riyal duties. His body language and demeanor says it all for every discerning mind to capture. There is this much a man can take from his wife but forcing a prince to abandon his royal family and royal duties is certainly not one of them as any responsible woman should or ought to know better never to come between her husband and his family. Harry's case is pertinent because these were the people who he grew up with and who raised him after his mother died in a ghastly motor accident when he was just a little kid. For Meghan to just entirely uproot him from them is an unconscionable and uncrossable bridge too far which will likely end up in an explosive pull out. A divorce is in the offing and before too long; Kanye and Kim just did. 

If Harry risked everything to bring Meghan into the royal family, the least Meghan could have done as expected was to also risked it all to hang in there with him until at least the passing of the Queen and Prince Philip in order to honor them and prevent the shame which her actions have caused the monarchy. Whatever might be her misgivings, at least they accepted her into their royal family, authorized a lavish royal wedding for her and attended their wedding in person. Such an honor is worth reciprocating. But instead, a royalty digging Meghan decided to wreck everything therein including separating two brothers who have been attached to each other for a long time; thus confirming everyone's original fear that she was not a proper fit for the royal prince. Simply too rebellious and too impatient and it shows. It is sad. 

MEGHAN MARKLE: A DESTRUCTIVE FORCE OF EVIL, THE OPRAH INTERVIEW.

ICHEOKU says it is obvious from the interview who wears the pants in the household of Meghan Markle and it is definitely not her hostage, Prince Harry. She would not allow him to go there in certain places during the interview and squeezes his hand to tell him to hush and not answer some questions. Even the way Harry always first seeks her approval by looking at her for the go ahead signal before answering certain questions says a lot about who is unquestionably in charge and dictating the terms of their relationship and it is certainly not Prince Harry. 

The fact that she forced or blackmailed him into denouncing his family's pure blue blood royal heritage and to abscond from the British royal household for a life of Hollywood superciliousness says a lot about Prince Harry's fickleness. Why would he allow himself to be beguiled and sheepishly led by the nose by a femme fatale, a divorcee, who is older than him, who is more cunning than him, a manipulating gold digger who deceived her way into marrying a prince only to become a turncoat traitor, out for total ruination of the British monarchy. What a terrible woman and she lied throughout the interview. It does not take a lie detector to notice the several times she was untruthful as any close observer would notice from her darting squirrelly eyes and body language. 

In this day and age of the Internet, especially Google, where everything is out there in the world wide web and easily discoverable; and when people even google things as little as confirming someone's identity, it is simply disingenuous for Meghan Markle to say that she did not know anything about the British monarchy before marrying into it. Moreso, she spent a considerable time in Canada which is a British commonwealth country under the Queen and must have somehow discovered a thing or two about the institution. Also, how can any woman intending to join a family by matrimony not first conduct a due diligence investigation about the family she was planning to marry into. But no, she thought she is so special and wanted to forcibly change a thousand year old institution and she came out scarred and scorched. 

She wanted it all. She was rebellious. She refused to conform to protocols and refused to know her tiered place in the hierarchy. She also forgot that she is below Kate Middleton, the future Queen of England and was supposed to defer to her. Simply put, she was full of it and was not cultured nor prepared for the expectations of the institution into which she married. She is a commoner who came from the streets and not a groomed well mannered lady meant for a prince as she does not have the requisite discipline for the position. So the red warning lights were flashing long before now and it is still a surprise that she and Harry are still together. Her parents are divorced and she has also previously been married and divorced herself and from the trajectory of things, ICHEOKU will not be surprised if she also ends up divorcing Harry some day. The only reason the marriage is still surviving is that Harry allowed her to put a very short leech around his neck with which she controls him with ruthless command of total obedience. 

Speaking of the interview with Oprah, one glaring question which Oprah failed to ask Meghan was why she allowed another man to walk her down the aisle when her biological father is still alive, ready, willing and able to travel to England for the wedding. He had purchased a wedding tuxedo, shoes, shirt and tie and was even rumored to be taking lessons on how to interact with the royal family and has made plans about getting his travel documents including his airfare ticket. So what exactly did her father do wrong that is unforgivable and unpardonably so egregious that she disowned him and begged another man, who happened to be the father of the groom and her father in-law to take the place of her father by walking her down the aisle. This question would have made the interview. But Oprah decided not to go there possibly because Meghan demanded it is a no go area and a precondition for doing the interview. 

So yes, she did not research into the royal family because she was desperate to marry a real life prince and in her gold digging rush pretended that everything was honky dory with the situation until they tried to make her a lady from the woman she is. She revolted because the street in her which was fortified by Hollywood made her naturally rebellious as she still craved the limelight's camera, lights and action, thinking that she can have it both ways. She forgot that she became part of an institution and that every institution has a code of existence including having someone who speaks for the institution by designation. Even presidents of the United States of America lose some privileges including freely doing whatever they want like normal citizens the moment they are sworn into office. It is therefore incredible that Meghan is whining about not being allowed to live "authentically" in the palace and this is a Hollywood personality complaining about putting up a facade. 

It is her admission that the Queen made her feel welcome, so why did Meghan Markle not take her frustrations directly to the Queen and plead for her intervention if she was convinced that she was not the problem but other palace staffers. The only problem was that she did not fit in as she did not know how to be in her assigned place and wanted to be the show itself, instead of playing the sub act which was her role within the general order of things. She is an actress and complaining about putting up an appearance during their South African tour and you wonder what again did she do for a living before meeting Prince Harry if not putting up appearances of make believe. So what if anybody wondered how dark her son will be, is she herself not black afterall or did she think that her color was not visible or that the British people are color blind, the history of racism and slavery considered. 

What was she thinking when she married into the British royal family where she does not naturally belong by reason of her skin color, divorcee status, a child of broken home and of course she is older than Prince Harry. Which parent anywhere would not raise those issues of concern if their son were to bring home such a woman and asks for their approval and blessing. What parent will not be thinking in the best interest of their son, afraid that a woman who was once divorced could also divorce again and leave their son stranded in love misery laland. And she refused to say who made the comment because according to her, such revelation will be so damaging to the monarchy and you wonder why she did the interview if her intention was not to damage the monarchy. 

She tried to make it a racial issue but forgot that she has these other baggage which are not trendy for a prince's wife to have. Just like in fit for merchantability, she was not fit for the prince because she is "rotten" for a princess. She is not a virgin, she was married before. She was divorced before, She is older than Harry and she is black. If it was into a Kunte Kunte African Kingdom that she was marrying into that could be totally and completely tolerable; but into the Queen of the entire white nationhood worldwide? That was simply too much for her to ask for not to expect eyebrows being raised and asking for a glowing general acceptance by the British people albeit their tabloid press. She is an American and knows a thing or two about racial prejudices and why she thought life in Britain will be any different, especially inside the royal family, simply befuddles ICHEOKU as well as many other observers worldwide. 

She said she thought about taking her life and you wonder why she did not think about getting divorce from Harry or even simply running away never to come back. She could have easily arranged a trip to America and abscond from there never to return back to England. But she chose the route of blackmailing Prince Harry into totally surrendering himself to her and when the pressure became unbearably too much, he caved in; believing that he was protecting his wife from going through another Paris tunnel of cruel fate just like his late mother Lady Di did. She played the victim card claiming that she was afraid for her life and this is an actress from a broken home who lived in Los Angeles ghetto and has practically seen it all, but she chose to act as a naive innocent little girl who was afraid and intimidated and literally held hostage by the British monarchy. ICHEOKU says, really? 

ICHEOKU says is adamant that Meghan Markle was not forthright in the interview and instead of admitting that she went in for the adventure of marrying a real life prince, lied that it was her love for Prince Harry that made her marry him. How about the man she married previously and later divorced, where went the love which she had for him or was it not love that made her marry him. But she wanted to eat her cake and still have it; wanted the perks of being a princess but without the responsibilities that come with it. She wanted romance without finance. She wanted to have it both ways and she knows exactly what she was signing up to when she ensnared the prince and said I do to him and at the least, ought to have known. Further, whatever life and career she said that she had before meeting Prince Harry pales in comparison to the perks of marrying a real life prince and she knows it.

Prince Harry at least admitted to some truth that he wouldn't have abandoned his family and abdicated from his royal responsibility if not for Meghan Markle. In his explanation, just like the Biblical Eve who made Adam become aware of his nakedness in the Garden of Eden, Meghan made him become aware that he was trapped in the monarchy. This opened his eyes and the fight for liberation began. ICHEOKU says Prince Harry is also right that his mother Lady Di would have been sad and very angry at the development as majority of the discerning world is mad and very angry as hell that Harry allowed himself to be taken hostage by a contriving and conniving manipulative old Meghan. 

Also, there would have been no Meghan in Harry's life had Lady Di been alive as she would have put her feet down to prevent it from ever happening. Harry also would not have turned into the unruly obtuse rascal which he became were Lady Di alive. As for those who say how about the Egyptian Arab guy who Lady Di was messing around with before they were both killed inside a Paris tunnel, ICHEOKU says she was only desperately crying for help and wanted to do something drastic to forcibly get some ears tuned in to her hurt feelings. ICHEOKU says likes the chicken coop, at least they won't be spending money on eggs and chicken stew; although they and Oprah Winfrey forgot about social safe distancing while in there despite making it a talking point at the beginning of the interview.

ICHEOKU says overall the interview was good but not as ballistic as was originally hyped. There was nothing disclosed which was not already known to the public, admitted they just confirmed them. Meghan Markle succeeded in putting a wedge between hitherto inseparable brothers; two princes who were yoked together by the tragedy of their mother's horrific death. What Lady Di put together, Meghan Markle has put asunder. She also made father and son to stop talking to each other as Prince Charles no longer communicates with his son, Harry; although rumors are rife that he did not actually sire him. It is simply waywardly that Prince Harry allowed himself to be used in this manner. He said they had to do what they had to do but some people only see him as a bewitched prince who has been taken hostage and now in a situation from which there is no plausible honorable exit. 

He is only making the best he could under the circumstances to mask the great pain caused by his absconding from his royal responsibilities and abandoning his family. By his actions, he is giving the middle finger to the British people as well as the nations of the Commonwealth and in fact to the whole white people of the world who the British monarchy represents and means something dear. All these because of an old divorcee actress from a broken home and you ask yourself was Meghan worth the trouble of turning his back on his family. What would Don Michael Corleone say or do? But if the fate of Fredo is instructive, then Prince Harry is lucky that the Queen is not Don Michael Corleone. He should be ashamed of himself for running away instead of staying put and solving whatever problems which he brought upon himself and on the royal family from within the inside. Granting interviews and to a woman who does not believe in marriage will not cut it. As for Meghan, she is a bad news beaver and a royal home wrecker. It is sad.  

OPRAH INTERVIEW WITH MEGHAN: THE MISSING QUESTION

Why did Oprah not ask Meghan why she allowed another man to walk her down the aisle when her own biological father is still alive, ready, willing and able to travel to England for her wedding. He purchased a wedding tuxedo, shoes, shirt and tie; and was even rumored to be taking weight reduction classes to look fit and took lessons on how to interact with the royal family. He also made plans about getting his travel documents as well as airfare ticket to and back from London. But he was disinvited or rather not invited to the wedding of his daughter by the same his daughter. So what exactly did her father do wrong to her that is unforgivable and unpardonably so egregious that she disowned him and hated him so much to the extent that she had to beg another man, who happened to be the father of the groom and her father in-law to take the rightful place of her father by walking her down the aisle. It is sad that Oprah did not go there or agreed not to go there; it would have made the interview.

INDIANS ARE TAKING OVER AMERICA: JOE BIDEN ALIGNS WITH PROUD BOYS?

ICHEOKU says exactly the type of talk which makes some people believe that Joe Biden is a racist and he is at it again. Now he is "complaining" that Indians are taking over America. However he failed to take responsibility for being an enabler in this their takeover bid as he has already appointed 55 of them into key positions in his nascent administration. From NASA to  speech writer to surgeon general and of course inadvertently confirming to black Americans that Kamala Harris is not one of them as she is an Indian as well. Joe Biden just confirmed the growing fears amongst white people that their country is being stolen right before their eyes and what he said was predicated on exactly the thinking beneath it. In short, Joe Biden put voice to  what millions of other white people are also thinking.

Imagine appointing 55 persons of a particular country's origin into the government of the United States of America within just 55 days of his administration and most likely many more of them will still be appointed in due course. Meanwhile in India, there is no white or black or Hispanic person, no matter how long they have lived in India, that is ever appointed into a government position, not even as a dog catcher. 

Anyway somebody is going to do the job regardless and provided they are the right fit for them, it is all good. But Joe Biden must stop adding insult to injury by labelling white boys who are deeply troubled about the continuing "de-whitefication" of America as white supremacists while himself is fully aware of their fears as he just expressed. Such denigration is callous, tone deaf  and very uncaring, especially in a situation where empathy is needed to help assuage the anxiety of white people who see themselves being displaced in the only country they can lay claim to. They are watching with great trepidation as they are being displaced and feeling helpless about it. The displacement is real and frightening as they have no other country unlike the Indians who can readily scurry away back to India if need be. 

This is causing great anxiety amongst white people, the reason white boys are acting out as any other self preservation conscious group would react faced with such development. What is needed in America is a creation of understanding amongst the various tribes and also a reduced speed of acceleration in the replacement and displacement effort; but not carry on as if no toes are being stepped on. It is imprudent to just stick it to their face and expect them to take it without complain and when they complain they are branded white supremacists and shamed as bigoted and in some cases hunted down as domestic terrorists. A new approach is definitely needed in addressing the erosion of white people in America in order to prevent their fear from some day snowballing into an inevitable collision with other Americans. 

POPE MEETS GRAND AYATOLLAH.

ICHEOKU says it is definitely a good sign when two eminent religious leaders sit down face to face to talk to each other on issues concerning their respective religions. It will certainly help allay whatever existing fears and suspicions their adherents have against each other, towards engendering a more peaceful co-existence amongst them. ICHEOKU says congratulations to Pope Francis and Grand Ayatollah Sistani for finally finding such a meeting of grounds. Well done fellas.

 KAMALA HARRIS IS INDIAN, NOT BLACK - JOE BIDEN.