Wednesday, April 7, 2021
PRINCE HARRY CHOSE FAME TO FAMILY - PRINCE WILLIAM.
NEW YORK DOORMEN FIRED FOR NOT AIDING ASIAN WOMAN: IT WAS WRONG.
Therefore, it is wrong for The Brodsky Organization, the owners of building at 360 West 43rd Street, Manhattan, New York City, to fire the doormen who were on duty during the attack for not rushing to the aid and rescue of the victim. The attack took place outside their building, on a public sidewalk, where their duty to open and close doors at 360 West 43rd Street did not extend to. Further, the victim is not a child, whose child status would have otherwise imposed a mandatory duty to rescue a child in danger on the doormen. Lastly, there was no special relationship between the doormen and the victim.
It is in the same New York City Long Island that a doorman, Ralph Body, was fired from his job for being too nice and too accommodating; and was upbraided for going far and beyond his duties in being too kind to tenants and passersby in building 27 at 27th Street. So what if the two doormen were aware of what happened to Ralph Body, afterall they all belong to the same Trade Union and decided to mind their business as they did not want to be similarly fired for being "too nice and too accommodating", this time to a total stranger. What crime did they commit and what wrong did they do in performing their duty, which was to open and close doors at building 360 West 43rd Manhattan New York City, that should warrant their dismissal from their job. Even the police warn the public against self help and not to resist criminals when they strike but to call the police. They also tell bankers that in case of bank robbers to always give them all the money they want and try to stay alive.
But here in New York City, the owners of a building are now telling us that they expected their employees to become vigilantes and to engage in violent self help being guardians of the surrounding streets and sidewalks near their building; and to physically intervene whenever they see someone in peril around their building. ICHEOKU is emphatic that had the two doormen intervened in the attack, the building management would have still fired them for veering off their duty post to intervene in matters outside their primary responsibility. Had they intervened and the attacker later sued them, would the owners of the building have accepted responsibility that the two doormen were their agents, acting within their authorized duty or quickly denied their action as a frolic and therefore not vicariously liable for it.
What if the accused attacker had a concealed weapon, afterall he murdered his own biological mother, went to prison for 12 years before being paroled, and then visited the vicious attack on the victim. What if in the course of their intervention the attacker had killed the two doormen or injured them or the doormen had even killed or injured the attacker, whose responsibility will that be? Would the management not have blamed them for courting their fate by going outside their prescribed duty to intervene in a matter which does not concern them nor their job as doormen.
The doormen did exactly what was reasonably expected of them to do in the circumstance: they immediately called 911, rushed out to help the victim and flagged down a passing police patrol vehicle to report the attack and also waited to give statements while the emergency vehicle arrived and took the victim to the hospital. This is exactly what doing something by the book which was expected of them really looks like and they should not have been fired for doing right by the woman and their employers as it was not their responsibility to fight off the attacker.
Even in carjacking situation, the police advise against resisting or fighting the car jacker, so why should this case be any different or was it because the victim is Asian and belongs to the class of protected endangered species of America who everybody must aid in situations as this. What other thing could possibly justify the unreasonable expectations placed on the doormen that led to their firing if not some peculiar consideration due to the current political atmosphere in America where Asians are being accorded some special protection.
In fact it is the two doormen that are actually being victimized in this matter and their Trade Union must not put up with it. They should proceed to the court immediately and have the management company reinstate the their two members back to their duty post. They did nothing wrong and there is nothing in what they did to warrant or justify their firing. They should not be singled out and punished for what a mad man did on the street side walk outside their area of authority. No rational person watching how viciously that huge beastly man attacked the woman would voluntarily put themselves in harms way by intervening in the attack. The attacker is massive and his history, although not known at the time of the attack, adds impetus to why no rational person would have intervened. If he had the heart to do that to a woman, after killing his own mother, imagine what he could possibly do to others including two intervening doormen.
There was no other emergency protocol in the circumstance which they failed to observe, short of what they did and they also locked their building to protect their tenants from possible harm. The Brodsky Organization was wrong in firing the two doormen and they should get their jobs back and in any other event, be paid handsomely for wrongful termination of employment. Where there is no duty owed to an individual there is no expectation of help or intervention to save the individual from danger or harm. Therefore the two doormen were not wrong in failing to fight off the attacker of the Asian woman in front of their building. It may be morally wrong or somewhat viewed as a breach of Good Samaritan aiding a victim, but that only applies when an aiding bystander puts the victim in more harm. Also, it was not as if the victim sought shelter in their building and they pushed her away and into her peril. They were innocent observers of a crime and that should not cost them their jobs.
ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS FROM THE SOUTHERN BORDER: WHY THEY COME.
What a warped sense of duty to country this is. Just in case you are still wondering why the dam of illegal immigration has burst at the southern border, note that it is because it is good to be free of obligations. It is cheaper to pay a coyote $5,000 bucks to take their child to America than to train them for 18 long years. As a result, those men in the Southern hemisphere are well incentivized to continue the flooding of their children into America. It is simple mathematics and economics, they are exact science and science don't lie. Until the government starts sending everyone back to their originating countries or their fathers traced and made to pay for their upkeep in America, the crisis at the southern border will only get worse. Now you know why they come.
Tuesday, April 6, 2021
BEAUTIFUL THINGS BY HUNTER BIDEN: A MEMOIR OF A CRACKHEAD.
SOUTHERN BORDER CRISIS: AMERICA'S CHILDREN NEW ENDANGERED SPECIES.
Monday, April 5, 2021
PARADE OF ANCIENT MUMMIES: WHAT IS WRONG WITH THOSE EGYPTIANS?
Sunday, April 4, 2021
HE IS RISEN: LETS CELEBRATE AS ALL THINGS ARE NEW AGAIN.
HE IS RISEN: REJOICE AND CELEBRATE SALVATION OVER CONDEMNATION.
Saturday, April 3, 2021
SHE AIN'T BLACK: REVEREND BOISE KIMBER NOW KNOWS.
But unfortunately, black people who are suffering identity crisis in America and laboriously seeking to be seen as being in power readily adopted her as one of them in the last election. It was the same way they adopted Kenyan Barack Obama for eight years and he played them to the very end without much shown for their welcome hug. ICHEOKU says it is about time black people demanded to have a real black person, who is down with the struggle and who actually inherited slave's ancestry, to represent them in any future White House political calculations. Kamala Harris ain't black and Barack Obama ain't black enough; the former is Indian Jamaican and the later is a HALFRICAN, a hybrid African and white mixed person, but none of them is black strictly speaking. So Mr Reverend, be advised accordingly to curb your enthusiasm.
IT IS HOLY SATURDAY: REMAIN IN HIS GRACE AS WE AWAIT HIS RESURRECTION.
NOAH GREEN'S CAPITOL ATTACK: HOW IS IT POSSIBLY NOT TERRORISM RELATED?
ICHEOKU says that he could have been a convert or sympathizer for the cause or even a member of a sleeper cell who decided to strike when he felt it was convenient and most likely to succeed did not seem to have factored into the determination. This is the third violent attack on American soil within the last few days, where a non white male attacker unleashed vicious mayhem on Americans, killing Americans in Boulder Colorado, Orange California and now in Washington DC, yet it is not terrorism related. But one police officer died a day later following the Capitol riot of January 6th, he was not even particularly directly touched by any of the rioters, yet his death was ruled terrorism related. Why the Noah Green's attack is not being classified as terrorism related defies simple logic and the only possible explanation for it could be that he has the protected skin color and cannot possibly be an American domestic terrorist because he is not a white male. He is black and blacks in America are immune from such classifications.
Here is a fellow who is a Muslim and a follower of Louis Farrakhan, the leader of Nation of Islam. He declared total and absolute obedience to Allah, saying that Allah has chosen him for other things outside his originally intended career path. This made him to abandon all his life's goals to do Allah's command, which suggests that he became a designated jihadist and warrior for Allah, a terrorist fighting for Allah. He admired Malcolm X and desired to meet him some day not too long. He said that the FBI and CIA were poisoning him and targeting him with unauthorized mind control operations. He also said that the Federal Government of Joe Biden is the number one enemy of black people. Noah Green had all the trappings of a terrorist and his manifesto and anger at the American government shows this. Then he decided to attack America's seat of power, the Capitol, in furtherance of Allah's will of a retributive justice, yet we are told that his action is not terrorism related.
ICHEOKU says if what he did and the trail of evidence leading up to it does not rise to the level of terrorism, what else then does short of flying a jumbo jet plane into the World Trade Center? He planned the attack, set it in motion and executed it killing one police officer and injuring another. He drove his car to the Capitol grounds, accelerated it and rammed it into a police barricade, killing one police officer Billy Evans and injuring another who is recovering in the hospital. The surrounding areas within the Capitol was put in a total lockdown; there was palpable fear in the Capitol about the full extent of the attack. He was armed with a knife and he charged at some policemen with it. He was shot and killed, thus resulting in two people dying as a result, himself and a policeman. But we are told that it was not terrorism related, yet the January 6th Capitol riot and associated deaths were terrorism related. ICHEOKU says this ain't right as America is being shortchanged in the eyes of the world by such often irrational and skewed circumstances driven narratives. It is sad.
Friday, April 2, 2021
IT'S GOOD FRIDAY: THANK GOD FOR JESUS.
PETE BUTTIGIEG: SCARED OF BARACK OBAMA?
JOE BIDEN CAUSED THE PROBLEM: SO BLAME HIM FOR IT.
Joe Biden is fully responsible for what is going on at the Southern border because if those smugglers and their retainers know that the children will be sent back to wherever they were smuggled from, they will not engage in such illegal activities. But when Joe Biden tells the world that children coming into America from the southern border will be welcomed and hospitably treated, he incentivizes the coming in of more children regardless of the manner of their entry, including being dropped from the top of the border wall. His mantra seems to be, just set foot in America and you are welcome, no questions asked and no answers expected. The smugglers are responding and taking full advantage of Joe Biden's words and they must be smiling to the banks as it is boom time for their business of human smuggling and child trafficking operations.
However such incentive seems to apply only to brown skin children coming in from the southern border, but not to black children who wants to come in from the Caribbean border axis. Why not solve the problem of scaling the border wall by topping it off with razor wires or sharp spikes like prison parameter fence, one may ask; but it is all for show as the real intent is not to actually solve the crisis because it is beneficial to America in so many ways. Anyway, just blame Joe Biden for what is currently going on down there. If those smugglers could be this audacious in dropping toddlers from such a great height, may be the next time, they might come with bulldozer to completely obliterate the border wall and make their entry seamlessly less difficult; and have thousands of smuggled illegal immigrants bum rush themselves into America. It is a shame.