Monday, March 15, 2021
JOE BIDEN: DEMOCRATS' MAKING OF EXCUSES FOR HIM CONTINUES UNABATED.
Is this yet another evidence that America often express righteous indignation on global issues based on mere convenience. Is America's narrative always dependent on their prevailing circumstances but never on their conviction on the rightness of their position. Do things only matter to Americans only if they adjudge it to so matter. Why is there no outrage for the con job which was perpetrated on Americans on November 3rd 2021? Was this the bargain which Americans were told they voluntarily made and if, hasn't buyer's remorse already set in already?
It is about time abatement begins as it is better to bravely do it now than suffer the eventual humiliation from a humongous mishap or gaffe. There is no shame in admitting one's mistake or that perils of aging has made it impossible for him to continue to discharge the duties of the office. Senior moments and associated afflictions of old age are universal and the world will understand if Joe Biden is adjudged to be no longer competent for the office into which Deep State placed him. Democrats cannot continue to pretend that all is well with him or that his neurons are firing better than Einstein's because they are not and the world knows about his deteriorating mental and physical condition.
America should not remain the butt of joke in the eyes of the world as a place where it does not matter who is in the White House because it does and should. America must not wait for an irreparable harm to be done first before acting, they should summarily act now in order to preempt it. Lets be brave about it and do it for country. #JoeGotToGo.
Saturday, March 13, 2021
PRINCE HARRY IS DAMAGED BEYOND REDEMPTION.
The couple owe the world this answer especially now that the royal family have denied being racist. But should we expect anything in clarification from the rascal renegade prince who broke the cardinal rule of family when he took side against his family and doubled down on his cringeworthy behavior by accusing them of racism. What a prodigal son he is, a dark prince set out to damage the image of the royal family by behaving in ways unworthy of a British royal prince. There was his Las Vegas nudity binging incident, then his absconding from his royal responsibilities and now his disparaging of the monarchy. In short he is a prince from hell and it is regrettable that he does not share the same behavioral DNA with his brother Prince William. It is sad.
GOVERNOR CUOMO: TARGETED BECAUSE OF 2024 PRESIDENTIAL RACE.
ICHEOKU says Governor Andrew Cuomo should stand his ground and not resign, especially when no smoking gun has so far been produced to conclusively prove the allegations against him. The #MeToo crazies have really gone crazy. They have gotten away with so much already and should not be allowed to continue their rage against men. They have gone too far and it will only get worse if they are not stopped from continuing to have their way in this manner where their mere allegations are now sufficient to deep six men. If the issue against the governor was the nursing home scandal, then there could be something to see here; but that some women are lining up to say stuff against him which they did not say when the supposed allegations initially occurred, is something that should be taken with a grain of salt.
But it is the 2024 Democratic Party's presidential ticket and some people, aware that it will be an easy grab for the governor, want to get him out of the way now. This is why the #MeToo hound dogs have been released on him and they are baying at the New York State governor while Democratic Party insiders are attacking him from the other side demanding he resigned his office immediately. The governor should dare them to impeach and remove him from office rather than wimpy away by resignation, as the former will be more honorable thing to do, while the later will suggest that he is guilty of the allegations. So instead of him committing suicide by falling on his own sword, he should force them to disembowel him themselves and in that way he will not die a shameful self inflicted death. But whether he resigns or is impeached, his political career will be over; so why make it easy for his traducers. It is a fight worth fighting on and the governor should go the full hog and die fighting.
Friday, March 12, 2021
CUOMO SHOULD NOT RESIGN, AT LEAST NOT YET.
JOE BIDEN'S JOB APPROVAL RATING IS BAD: THE NUMBERS DO NOT LIE.
ICHEOKU says what he did in his first address to the nation is akin to harvesting farm produce and taking credit for the bumper harvest without acknowledging the farmer who cleared the field, tilled the land and planted the crops. But American people cannot be deceived twice as they know who the force behind the coronavirus vaccines success is and it is not Joe Biden. It is President Donald John Trump whose Operation Warp Speed led to the resounding success. So, Joe Biden can try all he can to "plagiarize" the success and claim credit for what Trump accomplished as he always likes to do with other people's hard work; but nobody can deceive the American people all the time. He have shamelessly appropriated other people's work products in the past and has no scruples once again doing the same now with the coronavirus vaccines successes.
This is the same Joe Biden who scoffed at the idea that a vaccine could materialize within such a short period of time and vowed not to take any such a "rushed" vaccine during last year's presidential election campaign, but is now beating his chest as a wonder worker who made the same vaccines possible. Not even a passive mention was made by him of the president who spent his political capital to move mountains to bring these vaccines into fruition. Even the vaccines distribution network which practically remains the same today was put in place by Operation Warp Speed, yet Joe Biden claims credit for everything including the Johnson and Johnson vaccine which has been in the works since last year. But his credibility is suspect and American people knows, the reason they rate him lowly in his job approval.
Majority of American people do not approve of the job which Joe Biden is doing. Only 82% Democrats, 35% Independents and 6% Republicans are in favor while 18% Democrats, 65% Independent and 94% Republicans are disillusioned with him. That is an aggregate total of 123% in favor and 177% against from the 300% sampled across the three voting blocs. Yet he "won" the election but has so quickly fallen out of favor with those who "elected" him to have plummeted to this level just within 50 days in office. If it is this bad despite all the good media coverage which he is getting, imagine what the numbers would have been had the media been as mean to him as they were to President Donald John Trump. But it goes to show that lies have their limitations and that you cannot fool the people all the time. It is sad.
CHILD SOLDIERS OF AMERICA, REALLY?
PRINCE WILLIAM DENOUNCES RACISM.
Thursday, March 11, 2021
SHOUT OUT TO ALL NURSES OUT THERE: THEY ROCK!
MEGHAN MARKLE: WHAT ELSE DID SHE LIE ABOUT?
But they refused to consider the motivation of the Hollywood actress who covets the limelight and is addicted to the spotlight and possibly wanted to get even with the monarchy for denying her that by curtailing her excesses. She was livid that her voice was silenced and that she no longer gets all the attention and front page befitting of a Hollywood actress who married a real life prince. For her it is all about light, camera and action and she was not ready to role play for anyone or take a subsumed position behind those royals who are higher than her in ranking including Kate Middleton. She made her calculation and rebelled accordingly and then followed it up with the Oprah interview to thrash a family that welcomed her with open arms. That she did not tell truth and at best told only her own version of truth is also obvious.
Meghan Markle said that she called her father and urged him not to do an interview with British tabloid before her wedding. That she repeatedly demanded to know whether he has already granted them the interview so that she can intervene to prevent them from publishing anything that would mess up her wedding. She said that her father assured her that he did not grant any interview so she relaxed and did not proceed to muscle the tabloid to prevent any publication that will show her in bad light. But she claimed in the interview that she was scared for her life and that the palace did not protect her and allowed the British tabloid media to run her over like a roadkill. Query, if she could have intervened to prevent the publication of her father's interview as she stated, why then did she not prevent the publication of stories which she complained that were injurious to her hurt feelings? A "naive" little girl which she played in the interview but who could influence the publication of her father's interview. Really? So which part of the two stories is the lie since both cannot be true.
ICHEOKU says is emphatic that the Meghan's account of her experiences in the royal family will not pass the smell test and if she were put through a lie detector test, will fail woefully. Imagine a Hollywood actress complaining that she was turned into a commodity by the British media who used stories about her to sell their newspapers and magazines as well as overall air time. According to Harry's account, he did not like that the British media "commoditized" his wife and were not mindful that she is a human being. How again does Meghan make her money if not through being sold as an actress to a world of her fans who tune in to watch her put up acts? So, if she could commoditize herself and make millions from doing it, why can't others cash in on her fame and also participate in the commoditizing business as well. Is her complaint that the British tabloid were not sharing their profit with her and if not, did she ever consider copyrighting herself to prevent such peeling off of profits. So again which part of the story is true, that she is not a commodity or that others profited from her being a commodity?
She also claimed that her son Archie was denied a royal title of Prince because he is colored and not a full blooded pure white bred. But she deliberately forgot or failed to say that a 1917 edict by King George streamlined those descendants who are qualified to be named princes and princess and that her Archie was part of the excluded descendants. That it was a long running position which did not suddenly come into being just because a black woman married into the monarchy and begot a black son named Archie who cannot become a prince. But she intentionally made it to appear that her son Archie was specifically targeted and denied a title which is rightfully his in order to trigger resentment of the monarchy by the public as a racist institution which hates black people. A well intentioned Meghan would not have brought up the issue during the interview but her entire action was a planned attack on the monarchy, hence she did not care about the derivative innuendos and inferences and she cashed in on it. So, again which one is the truth, that Archie was denied a royal title or that Archie was not within the contemplated offsprings to be so designated?
Meghan's half sister Samantha Markle has come out to debunk Meghan's claim that she hardly knew her as according to Meghan they did not grow up together, neither have they been in close contact in a long time and that Samantha changed her last name back to Markle just recently because Meghan met and married a prince. Samantha provided pictures, documents and other photographic evidence to back her account of extensive relationship with Meghan including photographs of them as recently as 2008 during her graduation as well as childhood pictures which the two took together and change of name certificate. Meanwhile Meghan did not produce any such evidence to back up her salacious account of what went down in the palace and other experiences which she complained about; yet they want everybody to believe her just because she is a woman and women ought to be believed. ICHEOKU says but Samantha Markle too is a woman and she backed her own story with evidence which means that she should be believed doubly. So, again which part is true, that Meghan and Samantha hardly know each other or that Meghan was dodgy with her story?
It appears that Piers Morgan was right afterall in not believing Meghan Markle particularly her "suicidal thought" story as evidence shows that she lied about some parts of her story and could have lied about all of them. She is a tough mean gal who grew up in Crenshaw/Compton areas of Los Angeles, tough neighborhoods and she have seen it all and enough not to be easily intimidated nor overwhelmed by palace intrigues, to the extent that she would have contemplated taking her own life. ICHEOKU is not saying that it did not happen but that it is also possible that it did not happen. She is a manipulator extraordinaire, an actress, who can wangle her way through any situation and who even threw her family overboard in her desperate quest to marry a prince. She did not allow her father to attend her wedding and made another man to walk her down the aisle, an honor reserved for fathers. Even her half sister was not invited as well. Anyone who could do such is simply capable of just anything.
The only rational conclusion in Meghan Markle's dramatic exposition with Oprah Winfrey is that she played the racial and mental health issue cards just to get even with the British monarchy. Who doesn't know for example that a child born by a black woman for a white man will not be white but colored. So how dumb must the palace be to be otherwise anxious about the color of Archie when it is an already known fact that he will be off white at best. Anyway, lets hope the matter is now rested with the palace's response and that the intended bloodbath has been averted. It was a shame that Meghan Markle went this far to disparage a family who welcomed her into their midst with open arms and she was callous in disrupting a hitherto healthy relationship between Prince Harry and his brother Prince William. What Lady Di put together, Meghan ruthlessly put asunder. It is pitifully sad.
Wednesday, March 10, 2021
PIERS MORGAN SPOKE FOR MILLIONS OF PEOPLE.
"On Monday I said I didn't believe Meghan Markle in her Oprah interview. I have had time to reflect on this opinion and I still don't believe her. If you did or still does, its OK. Freedom of speech is a hill I am happy to die on. Thanks for all the love and hate. I am off to spend more times with my opinions." - Piers Morgan
With the statement Piers Morgan vows to die and be buried with his conviction. It is the right thing to do and it makes him a man of character, who has a core and also conviction. ICHEOKU strongly believes that what is good for the goose should also be good for the gander and that free speech should not be predicated on the lips or fingers making it. It should be applied universally and in uniformity; or not applied at all. What Meghan Markle said about the royal palace was outrageous to so many people especially the British people whose Queen was disparaged by her. So, why was she not canceled? But Piers Morgan who rose in defense of the royal household was canceled as being "outrageous" for not believing Meghan Markle.
ICHEOKU says what is the standard of judgment here and whose sensibilities governs the action on cancellation. It was the same reason Socrates was forced to drink cyanid because he posited that the earth was round, which to the thought process prevalent in those years, was a sacrilege. They demanded that he retract what he said and revert to the ordered opinion in the society that the earth was flat, but convinced on his opinion he refused and drank the poison instead. Several centuries later he was proved right and those who demanded he changed his opinion were proved the wrong fellas, admitted the damage they caused him was irreversible.
ICHEOKU says supports and stands with Piers Morgan fully and completely because he is a man who stands by his conviction and so should everyone else be allowed to hold firm to what they believe in and not be forced to believe what others believe just to satisfy the blood lust of some vengeful individuals. Piers Morgan spoke for so many millions of people especially those without formidable voice. To hell with cancel culture.
PIERS MORGAN CANCELED: FORCED TO RESIGN BECAUSE OF MEGHAN MARKLE.
ICHEOKU says welcome to Cancel Culture Club British chapter as the American Cancel Culture buzzards have successfully infiltrated the United Kingdom and their complaints, which were probably largely bots, successfully took down one of the foremost personality on British television. With this recorded success, they will only become more emboldened as they seek other targets to destroy and bring down. As it appears now, nobody is allowed to hold contrary opinion or viewpoint on issues anymore and it is either they conform or they are doomed. Piers Morgan dared to have an independent mind by refusing to comply and his job was gone. Meghan Markle said it, she is a woman and women should be believed is their now universal controlling standard and if you dare fall out line, challenge or question anything she said you are gone; and it took just 41,000 complaints for them to launch an investigation about what was said.
So what if Meghan Markle lied, exaggerated, embellished or even totally made up what she said. Also, even if what she said are true, are people no longer allowed to entertain their own doubts about things other people said, especially in this day and age when so much lies are being told everywhere as seen in some people coming back to recant and apologize for lies which they told, some with far reaching consequences such as resulting death. A French school girl just came out to retract her allegation that her teacher said something bad about Muslim Prophet Mohammed for which the teacher was murdered by an Islamist. As it turned out the student was not even in school the day she claimed her teacher said what she claimed he said So, if this girl lied why couldn't Meghan Markle too lie, assuming her claims are lies; or is there now a new standard which says that Meghan is infallible and above reproach and whatever comes out of her mouth is the gospel truth.
If Meghan Markle can have her own truth as expressed in the interview, why can't Piers Morgan or any other person including ICHEOKU be allowed the same level of liberty to have and express their own truth or opinion. Why was what Meghan Markle said not first subjected to the same level of scrutiny of an investigation before being believed. But no, it is Piers Morgan's expression of doubt about what Meghan Markle said that must be investigated as he was not supposed to doubt women because women are automatically believed and Meghan Markle is a woman. Meanwhile Meghan Markle has not adduced or produced any incontrovertible evidence in support of her allegations which created the room for doubts. Her allegations were just her own recollections and the monarchy has come out to say that other version possibly exists.
This woman is a professional actress for crying out loud and she put an award wining performance during the interview and as far as some people are concerned, she could have been acting a script throughout the interview. It is an honest human disposition to question such performance and nobody should be punished or investigated for reacting to her claims and however they saw fit. People regularly lie about so many life situations including being raped when the person they accused of raping them was never even around the place which place they claimed the rape took place. For example, so many cases of prison sentences have been reversed over the years in America as wrongly convicted individuals were later proved innocent because their conviction was based on false testimony.
So, Meghan claimed that she had mental breakdown and was suicidal but was not given help in Britain, but she did not tell the watching world during her Oprah interview whether she has since sought therapy upon regaining her freedom in America or did her traumatic experience suddenly dissipate following her great escape from the royal household hostage situation. Everything in life is contextual, the reason there is white and black and of course grey. There is also day and night as well as dusk and dawn; all these variants because things are not always what they seem including certain conclusions and inferences. It is therefore healthy to hold opinions and debate issues no matter how repugnant they may sound of appear to others. It is what oils society particularly mental health and makes us human beings.
What then is the essence of developed thinking if everybody must accept things unquestionably just because of who said them. Why again do lawyers, legislators and advocates still have jobs if debating issues are no longer allowed or tolerated in societies. Why does a coin still have two faces if not in continuation of humanity's tolerance for different perspectives including the right to reject an argument or a position taken as not true and/or correct. Why must one side to a debate always be treated with special deference while the contrarian is scorned and punished. Is this how civilization will continue to thrive or is it a harbinger of damnation awaiting any society that becomes atrophied due to lack of innovation which usually comes from holding different thinking. Such a morphing tunnel-vision thinking society is doomed and this is why the Cancel Culture movement which is forcing this on societies must be stopped now or they will kill civilization.
JILL AND JOE BIDEN: WHAT TYPE OF PARENTS ARE THEY ANYWAY?
Tuesday, March 9, 2021
HOUSTON: WE HAVE A PROBLEM.
MEGHAN MARKLE'S OPRAH INTERVIEW: AN ATTACK ON THE BRITISH MONARCHY.
They are driven with their maniacal quest to tarnish the monarchy and they had no scruples in dishing out rehearsed lies through the conniving and contriving Meghan, a willing participant in the scheme to take it to the monarchy. How any sane reasonable person can believe that anybody in the palace questioned baby Archie's skin color, fully aware that his mother Meghan is black and her offspring is naturally going to be somewhat off white and not a snow white, white boy is shocking to say the least. But they rehearsed their lines very well and following a Hollywood opinion sampling knew exactly the type of accusations to level and how riveting they will be and then went to town with it.
First they swarmed her wedding from America. Then they encouraged her to begin her rebellion against the monarchy before finally bolting away back to America and taking a British prince and his son along. Now she is accusing the same people who welcomed her into their royal family, approved a very lavish princely wedding for her as well as volunteered the future King of England to step in to give her hand away in marriage to his son, of being racists. ICHEOKU says to get to the root of the matter, we must follow the money. Who is funding Meghan Markle? Some American deep pockets. Who gave them a free accommodation and security details in America before they got their own place? Tyler Perry, a black man. Whose neighborhood did they move into and at her instigation and encouragement? Oprah Winfrey, a black woman. Whose company have they been keeping mostly since moving back to America? Mostly black Hollywood elites.
Therefore it is safe to say that it is black equity crusaders that are working overtime here in attacking the British monarchy using Meghan Markle as their front person. It is their attempt to dilute the monarchy and force it to dissolve into a mixed race institution. These anarchists have decided to go after the more than one thousand year institution and force it to liberalize and diverse by reducing its whiteness. They want some blackness inside the British monarchy and if they cannot get it, just to destroy it or tarnish its image as a whites only racist institution. It is the cancel culture cancer that is eating up America that they are trying to permeate into the British monarchy and destroy it or at least demean it by raising rehearsed salacious accusations which will put the palace in bad light.
From the general circumstances, the various actors involved in this campaign are primarily activists and it shows that the Black Lives Matter organization is possibly involved in it too. They want to ensure equitable blackness in the monarchy or tarnish its image if they don't succeed. They are mad that the monarchy is too white and have largely remained so for centuries as the anchor point of white supremacy, being a whites only institution, and they want it changed and have found a willing accomplice in Meghan Markle. They want to democratize the British monarchy and are pulling all stops to make it happen. Meghan could have easily made up the whole story or exaggerated parts thereof to burnish her story and make herself a more sympathetic victim figure. Just watching her eyes and body movement shows a professional at work and she worked it so well that many people believe her story as plausible.
But ICHEOKU is not buying into the malarkey as they are too well scripted, choreographed and rehearsed to be true. Even if the palace entertained the idea that her son will not be as white, they wouldn't have voiced it out to her hearing, fully aware how it will rub her and her husband on the wrong side. Also, even the way Oprah framed some of her questions suggests that there was a concert to arrive at a preferred destination answers which will increase viewership of the interview and with it an increased revenue yield. For example, Oprah asked Meghan a very leading question "were you thinking of harming yourself", instead of just asking her "what was your state of mind" or "what was she thinking at that point in time?"
ICHEOKU says from all indications, the interview was not organic as Oprah wants the world to believe. It is a product of several rehearsals, preparations and auditioning before the last stage show was put on CBS on Sunday. It is Hollywood produced show and they sampled each question and rehearsed every answer to see what will get the most bang before finally deciding on which ones to settle with that will be most impactful. They purposely targeted the monarchy and they went full throttle to land their knockout punches but the British society is smarter than that and they will not accept the bullying of their monarchy bt two rascals and their American collaborators. There is no corroborating evidence and it largely remains a Meghan said this that the monarchy did that; may be the monarchy will respond but they have not so far, assuming they will ever honor the restive Meghan and their prodigal son with the dignity of a response.
Prince Harry complained that his daddy did not come to their rescue but he never said he consulted his daddy nor sought his opinion or took his advice first before he brought Meghan home to the royal family. So as a fully grown man who can take decision about who will marry regardless of family input, he should have also taken charge of the developing situation without bothering anyone and now whining about the lack of care by his daddy. Action begets reaction and it is possible that Harry could have said something definitive such as "you people must hands off my wife matters" or even acted out angrily in such a way that made his daddy to decide to leave him and his wife alone for fear of being accused of not wanting his son to marry a black actress who is older than him and who was previously once married and divorced.
Yes, Prince Charles could have been a victim of walking a fine thin line who was forced to stay away or aloof in order to avoid any insinuation of racism against Meghan or the misinterpretation of his words and actions owe to the peculiar situation which was brought upon the royal household by Prince Harry in marrying Meghan Markle. Unfortunately, he ended up now still being accused of being a racist who questioned the color of the skin of his grandson Archie; a case of one running away from the frying pan of possible accusation of racism into the fire of being accused of being a racist who was disturbed about the color of his grandson and voiced his concerns out. So far, Prince Harry has absolved only his grand parents but not his father or brother William, thus leaving both as the possible suspects who questioned Archie's skin color. But it is obvious that it was Charles who could have done it, if it was true since it only takes some educated deductions to figure that out.
Anyway, British people must see the attacks for what they are. It is directed at the British monarchy and they want to take it down. It is cancel culture creeping across the Atlantic and what better way to make a thunderous statement than to take on the symbol of British greatness and the beacon of white people. Therefore British people must rise up to defend their age old institution and protect it from the cancerous American cancel culture which can morph into any form and in this case, Meghan Markle. They are possessed by satan and they want it all. These lunatics want to destroy anything they cannot lay their hands on and they have no regard for institutions including things that represents them. They see Western civilization as dangerous and they want to bring it down. This time, it is the British monarchy that is in their crosshairs and they are coming for it and they will not stop until they are stopped themselves. Enough of the metastasizing cancel culture pandemic. #DefendTheMonarchy.
Monday, March 8, 2021
PRINCE HARRY GETS NO APOLOGY: NONE IS DUE NOR COMING.
ICHEOKU says apologize for what, Prince Harry? For a self inflicted emotional distress caused when he brought home to the royal household for marriage a woman who is older than him, who was not a virgin, who was previously married and previously divorced, who is from a broken home, a commoner who is not steeped in mannerism and etiquette befitting of a prince's wife and a princess of England; and she is black!
What was Prince Harry thinking in the first place or was he just trying to prove that he can be radically more rebellious after his Las Vegas nudity and romping incident was forgiven by Her Majesty. Haven't the royal family tolerated enough already of this prodigal rascal of a son? Who was supposed to be doing the apologizing here Prince Harry, assuming any apology is deemed needed, due and pending?
This whining of demand for an apology is simply adding insult to injury and must stop. The attempted reverse psychological warfare cannot and will not be tolerated. This is a fella who has caused so much pain and trouble in the royal household already by repeatedly veering off the narrow straight line required of his royal birth and here he is trying to pass the buck of responsibility once again by playing the victimhood card. Enough, Prince Harry. #GetYourSenseBackHarry.
MEGHAN MARKLE AND PRINCE HARRY: DIVORCE IS IN THEIR FUTURE.
If Harry risked everything to bring Meghan into the royal family, the least Meghan could have done as expected was to also risked it all to hang in there with him until at least the passing of the Queen and Prince Philip in order to honor them and prevent the shame which her actions have caused the monarchy. Whatever might be her misgivings, at least they accepted her into their royal family, authorized a lavish royal wedding for her and attended their wedding in person. Such an honor is worth reciprocating. But instead, a royalty digging Meghan decided to wreck everything therein including separating two brothers who have been attached to each other for a long time; thus confirming everyone's original fear that she was not a proper fit for the royal prince. Simply too rebellious and too impatient and it shows. It is sad.