JOE BIDEN'S ANGER PROBLEM: A PRESIDENCY DISQUALIFYING PROBLEM.

ICHEOKU says American media has willfully and for the large part ignored and glossed over the many shortcomings of Joe Biden which would have otherwise disqualified him for president, made him unelectable  or at least called attention to his fitness for office. Joe Biden has anger issues and the media knows that it is not a good quality for someone who wants to occupy the White House and be seconds away from the nuclear codes to have. 

Yet they have played dumb about it and dismissively treated it as inconsequential. They harped on it as a disqualifying problem for John McCain when the deceased former Arizona Senator ran for president in 2008 but not now in 2020 when Joe Biden is running for the same office, so, what changed? 

ICHEOKU says what changed the narrative now is that their beloved Joe Biden is involved and with Democrats, things like that are mere ancillary distractions which are better ignored, unlike when a Republican candidate is involved. It is the same way they were questioning President Donald John Trump's mental fitness for office and even supported invoking Article 25 of the Constitution to remove him from office until Joe Biden happened and they saw he has a worse mental disequilibrium than the president. 

Suddenly, mental fitness for office is no longer an issue for them as they pushed it back behind them and filed it away completely. The only explanation being their bias, as they are always vested in a certain outcome and accordingly skew their narrative to achieve their objective, regardless. It is once again happening with Joe Biden's well known anger problem as the media has refused to report on it in addition to his obvious mental degradation. 

A media that is supposed to vet candidates for office and report their findings factually in order to help American people make informed decision on who they vote for any office, especially the presidency, but is not doing their job or rather purposefully shirking away from it due to the person and politics involved. 

Joe Biden is very quick to anger and he has repeatedly publicly showed this and you wonder why is he not being called out for it. American people witnessed a lot of his angry fits during last fall's Democratic Party's presidential primaries campaign when he continuously bared his fangs at journalists who dared ask him tough question. 

Joe Biden also took his anger out on his then fellow presidential candidates aspirants during the debates; a fact which came full circle when he went off on Elizabeth Warren for not acknowledging his input in a certain bill sponsored by her. American people had a glimpse of what the people of the Great State of Delaware were forced to put up with for nearly the fifty years Joe Biden was their representative in Washington DC and it was not a good sight to behold. 

Joe Biden revealed himself as not being the Mr Nice Guy which many people thought him to be or which he rather passed himself off to be before the mask came off, revealing an acerbic, choleric and very eruptive Joe Biden. He was seen several times berating reporters for daring to ask him some questions which he considered off limits, including questions about his corrupt influences and corrupt son Hunter Biden. 

Even as recently as few weeks ago, he erupted on Charlamagne de God's Breakfast Club as well as at a CBS interviewer who he insinuated of indulging himself with cocaine. Many other instances of his choler happened publicly and were captured on video, so it is not for lack of evidence that the media had chosen not to highlight it. Instead they are guilty of complicity and cover up, trying tirelessly to get him into office because of they dislike for the president. 

American people saw his explosive rage of fury when he wagged his finger menacingly at a reporter for asking him a question about his Ukrainian scandal in which he was captured on video boasting how he threatened Ukrainian government of withholding a $1 billion loan guarantee if they did not sack their Prosecutor General. Such question, it appeared, was definitely a no-go area for Joe Biden and you wonder if Joe Biden was innocent, why he should be so angered about being asked to explain what many people believe did not pass the smell test. 

Unfortunately, Joe Biden doesn't want any reporter looking into his past record or trying to extract from him some explanations about certain identifiable incidences of inferable corruption of forcing an independent country to remove their chief law enforcement officer before they can get loan guarantees from the United States of America. 

There was also another incident when a reporter wanted some answers about his son Hunter Biden's BURISMA corruption scandal which Joe Biden did not want to talk about. The reporter merely wanted Joe Biden to explain his involvement or rather what he knew about his crackhead son Hunter Biden's Ukrainian and Chinese shady dealings, but Joe Biden would have none of that and flew off the handle and refused to address the two burning questions which made him look like a Shady Joe. 

He did not want the reporter to ruin his image of an affable incorruptible Joe which many have come to associate him with, until his crackhead son Hunter Biden happened. ICHEOKU says still recalls the "ask another question" retort of Joe Biden at the reporter and you wonder why another question when the first question was not answered. 

There were other incidents of his obvious rage, like when a reporter asked him why he misquoted the president's comment during the Charlottesville incident that "there are good people on both sides."  Instead of answering the question and explaining why he did what he did, misquote the president, Joe Biden again flew off the handle and attacked the reporter. 

ICHEOKU says wonders what type of molten magma is roiling inside Joe Biden that makes him to often blow off his top gasket. During the Democratic Party presidential primaries campaign, Joe Biden was asked to explain why he exaggerated the crowd size at his campaign events after he said that he gets the biggest crowds, compared to Elizabeth Warren. He again reacted angrily at the reporter and refused to back his claim with any supportive data. 

Recall that Joe Biden once threatened to beat up President Donald John Trump, saying that he feels like beating up the president and that if it were during his High School days, he would take the president behind the woodshed and  smack him right there on the mouth. Joe Biden also used the words "punching it and punching it" to describe how to stop domestic violence. Such statements of violence shows a man with an innate passion for fermenting violence and who is naturally prone to causing harm on other people. 

Joe Biden is angry, disturbed and deeply perturbed and it shows whenever his feather is ruffled, speaking of having a very thin skin. How Joe Biden raised his voice and shoot his hand in gesture of rage at Elizabeth during their presidential primary debate in Ohio is another evident of his rage and also an indicator that Joe Biden does not respect women and threats them disdainfully. 

ICHEOKU says does not know if Joe Biden was forced to evolve that way because of the many tragedies which befell his family or he is naturally an angry person. But whichever one it is, being so angry and easily provoked into a rage is not good for anyone seeking the highest elected office in the land. A president is repeatedly provoked and a president who cannot control his anger might act rashly and in ways that might prove detrimental to America. Joe Biden has rage issues and Joe Biden has shown repeatedly that he cannot control his anger issues and therefore not a fit person for the presidency of the United States of America. 

Such a person will do much harm to the country with all the instrumentalities of power at his disposal, including the nuclear bomb. American people must therefore consider the ramifications of Joe Biden's anger as they go to the polls on November 3rd to elect a new president. ICHEOKU says that certainly should be a disqualifying quality for a candidate for the office to have and Joe Biden possessing it should make him unelectable for the office. He will be easily provoked to wars and he will act rashly because his anger will not give him a breathing space to think his actions through and thoroughly. In this election, think before you vote.

VOTING JOE BIDEN IS CUTTING YOUR NOSE TO SPITE YOUR FACE: DON'T DO IT.

ICHEOKU says if there is any substantive reason to vote for Joe Biden, will be in the front line campaigning for his election. But after crosschecking every factor, including what will be in the best interest of America, considering the physical capacity and mental ability of a president, have determined that Joe Biden lacks the credentials. Therefore ICHEOKU refuses to believe that anybody is sincerely and seriously considering Joe Biden as a good alternative to President Donald John Trump. The responsibilities of the office of the president of the United States of America are so cumbersome that a man with obvious incapacities cannot effectively run it. The buck usually stopped at the desk of the president, so let no apologists voice out that Joe Biden will surround himself with experts because that will not cut it either. 

Joe Biden is gone, both mentally and physically, and it will be a huge joke electing such a heavily depreciated person to the presidency of the United States of America. The world is watching and waiting to see how seriously American people treat their presidency and whether they will elect a man without his faculties president. With Donald John Trump, the world thought that Americans are merely rebellious, but if they elect Joe Biden, the entire world will conclude that Americans are indeed crazy and should not to be taken seriously because they make mockery of their presidency. 

If the Democrats wanted a real change, they would have presented to American people a healthier and more coherent candidate they can believe in, not a dead man walking zombie who suffers memory recall, is incapable of independent thinking and who cannot make stringed sentences. America has too many problems now, including an insurgent China, an economy on back feet and of course the Chinese Wuhan coronavirus disease to want to shift course and experiment with a mentally retarded man as president. 

ICHEOKU says you may not like the in your face obtuse personality of the president, but please don't trade him for an incapacitated man as rational people do not cut their nose to spite their face. You may not like President Donald John Trump but you will be damned if you replace him with Joe Biden because you will get a government operating on a basement mode. Let your love for country trump over your dislike for the president and vote to keep America First. Only a person with unalloyed love for the country can successfully protect America from the amassed forces waiting to pull America down and tear America to pieces. Regrets are often too late, so don't regret your rash decision to throw away a good presidency because of the man at the helm. Vote for continuity. 

JOE BIDEN HAS A LOW OPINION OF BLACK PEOPLE: QUITE CONDESCENDING.

ICHEOKU says the only way black people in America can politically assert themselves and regain voters respectability is to resoundingly reject Joe Biden's presidential candidacy this November 3rd 2020. They can achieve this by either casting protest votes for President Donald John Trump or simply seating out the election between the two white men by completely boycotting the election. But to still vote for Joe Biden after all he did and said against black people, believing that Joe Biden is the black presidential candidate or that he is a lesser evil than Trump, will be a testament of cluelessness, a lack of sense of self worth and an affirmation of unthinking herd mentality. 

For a man who does not care about black people or rather who has a very low opinion about black people to get black votes will show that Joe Biden was right about his assessment of black people as incapable of independent thinking or that black people do not in fact know any better and are sheepishly led. Otherwise how could any proud black person vote for a man who repeatedly castigates and disparages black people without a care in the world. It simply does not make sense that after the many disparaging things which Joe Biden has said about black people that he should still be getting much support from black people. A matter made worse because Joe Biden has not yet even spelt out any target specific policies meant to ameliorate black people's hardship in America which he will pursue if elected. 

Yet this is the fella some black politicians and pastors alike are supporting for president and asking black people to vote for. ICHEOKU says do these black leadership actually care for black people or are they just in it for what they can get from it, otherwise why are they not holding Joe Biden to account for his many anti black people racist speaks. It was not once or twice nor thrice that Joe Biden has disparaged black people for them to still be dismissed as misspeaks or mistakes. No, Joe Biden has repeatedly done and said so much anti black people things and continues till today that it has become a pattern and an indelible part of who he is. Joe Biden is a good ole white boy with racist DNA in his blood, his unsuccessful attempt to mask it notwithstanding. It is very condescending of Joe Biden to think this way and he is unapologetic about living his white privilege life. 

ICHEOKU says it was not a misspeak when Joe Biden recently on Charlemagne da God's Breakfast Club made the "you ain't black" comment. So also was not a mistake his latest anti black people comment that unlike Hispanic people, black people are monolithic and generic in thought. A matter made worse because this statement was made by Joe Biden barely twenty four hours after Joe Biden had suggested that a black CBS interviewer possibly have cocaine in his system. As always, Joe Biden usually sees black people as drug dopes and because the CBS guy is black that automatically made him a drug using suspect. There is no other reason Joe Biden brought up the drug use other than that the interviewer is black, otherwise why did he raise the issue against him and not the other fellow interviewers. This his belief also possibly explains why he championed the 1994 Crime Bill that disproportionately punished crack cocaine use by black people with stiffer sentences than powder cocaine use by White people. 

There is a developed pattern of Joe Biden's inclinations to always put black people down and in their place. So, any person still excusing Joe Biden's obvious prejudice against black people is either living in denial or is impaired by his or her hatred for President Donald John Trump into concluding that any person will be a better president for black people than the current president. ICHEOKU says to those apologists of Joe Biden who frequently excuses his anti black people rhetorics as gaffes, why is it that these gaffes occur only when he is speaking about black people? How many times has Joe Biden ever gaffed about White people, Asian people, Chinese people or Hispanic people. It shows that his mouth indeed spits out what his mind is really thinking and exactly where his heart is, that black people are inferior to him and technically still in bondage of slavery, the reason they do and vote exactly as told and are incapable of voting their conscience and interest. 

It did not start with this 2020 election cycle as Joe Biden has a storied anti black people dispositions within his portfolio, enough to disqualify and not elect him president because without black votes, he does not stand a chance in hell of being elected president. Black people must therefore register their displeasure at what Joe Biden have reduced them to, mere unthinking, mind numbed robots who always vote as commanded. ICHEOKU says any black person who votes for Joe Biden this November 3rd 2020 election, a fight between two rich white men, has no honor left in them. If they are so appalled at the president that they cannot bring themselves to vote for him, they should sit out the election rather than confirm what Joe Biden said of them as incapable of making independent decisions, especially as to how to vote and who to vote for in an election. 

Joe Biden is who Joe Biden is. He is a good ole racist white boy who hates the audacity of black people who don't know that they were once in chains. He was thinking as much himself when he said "they gonna put you all back in chains" and he also once boasted that his State of Delaware was a slaves owning State which bestowed him the right credentials of a Southerner, which in turn will help make his candidacy viable in the racist Deep South. Joe Biden's love for the White race and his desire to be counted amongst segregationists led him to sing the praises of unapologetic segregationists such as Jesse Helms, Strom Thurmond and Robert Byrd. Joe Biden also opposed school busing and the NAACP once described an amendment to a bill which he wrote as "anti black people and a set back for the Civil Rights Act." It was Joe Biden's racist tendencies that made him decry a desegregated America as a racial jungle in which he did not want his children and grand children to grow up in. 

Yet this is the man some black people are giving credit for loving black people and you wonder on what parameters were their assessment based. It is also on record that Joe Biden said that he had never seen a black person who is articulate, bright and clean until Barack Obama happened unto the stage and you wonder how scornful he was of Martin Luther King, Jesse Jackson, Ron Brown, Marcus Garvey, Louis Farrakhan, John Lewis and so many other erudite black people who walked the earth in America ever before Barack Obama was conceived. In the entire black race of America, for over 500 years, 33 million plus strong of them, yet Joe Biden did not consider anyone of them "articulate, bright and clean" until 2008. If this does not say something about Joe Biden's condescending opinion about black people, then nothing else short of him calling black people Niggers on CNN will qualify. 

A man who could describe convicted black people as predators who are too sociopathic to rehabilitate is not a man who black people should believe in and so much to want to elect him president. Black people have no inheritance in the house (presidency) of Joe Biden and therefore they should not help him become president. What is the point of black people voting for Joe Biden when he has this low opinion about black people. As a black person, don't you feel revulsed about the things which Joe Biden has said against black people and if, why do you still want to reward him with your vote. 

ICHEOKU says to black people, if ever there is a time to forcefully reject and denounce servitude in America and for once, assert your black selves as equal to Joe Biden and his white folks, this November 3rd election is it. It is either you vote for the other guy to register your protest against Joe Biden or you don't vote at all for either white men. That will make much difference and a better statement than voting for a man who takes black people for granted. 

Black people, with your votes, you must tell Joe Biden and his white liberal Democrats that they cannot win the White House without you and because they indeed need your votes to win, they must work very hard to earn your votes and not take you for granted any more. Also, that such days of a conformed voting order are long gone when they treat black votes as already in the bag and could care less about what black people need and want out of a given presidency. Further  that black people are not herd animals who can easily be corralled into a voting bloc, without any input on why they should vote for a particular candidate as directed and what is in it for them. Like with other tribes in America, black people should learn how to first demand and obtained beneficial solid commitments from candidates before they vote for them. 

It is obvious beyond any disbelief that racist Joe Biden does not like black people and he regularly shows this. It is wrong and it is condemnable for Joe Biden to despise black people so much that he regularly bluntly voices out his dislike of them. It is not a mere coincidental gaffes that within just a space of less than three months that "you ain't black", "you should be tested for cocaine" and "black people have no diverse thought" came out of Joe Biden's mouth consecutively. It is where his heart is and what his mind is thinking that black people ain't worth much in his eyes. Therefore, any black person still making excuses for Joe Biden's racist inclinations or telling black people to still vote for Joe Biden this November 3rd, 2020 is not worthy of their blackness. 

They should free themselves from their mental slavery which generates the inferiority complex to be beholden to a known racist white man Joe Biden. Please black people do not encourage Joe Biden's racism, do not elect him president because he has not earned your votes, do not vote for him on November 3rd. Instead seat out the election, just boycott the election and let the two rich white men fight it out by themselves and of course for themselves. Joe Biden does not like black people and he treats them disrespectfully and an in kind return favor is deservingly apposite that he may finally feel what it is like to be not loved. Joe Biden does not deserve black votes because he has not earned it and should therefore not get them. #SayNoToJoe.

HARVEY WEINSTEIN: WHY AGAIN WAS HE SENT TO PRISON FOR 23 YEARS?

ICHEOKU says the fact that Tara Reade is a woman and was not believed has forced ICHEOKU to revisit the Harvey Weinstein ordeal and ask where was the justice therein? If the woman who accused Joe Biden of sexual molestation cannot be believed, why should the women who similarly accused Harvey Weinstein be believed? Why was the believability of women not be a one-cap fits all standard for all men accused by women of sexually assaulting and molesting them. It should be an all or nothing standard, either to believe all women or not to believe any woman at all. 

Why would Joe Biden walk when Harvey Weinstein is caged for 23 years or are politically exposed persons somewhat special breed of people that they enjoy greater immunity than those who finance their campaigns and support their runs for elected office. It would seem that Harvey Weinstein was used and dumped by all those politicians who cavorted his wealth to help fund their election campaigns, only to abandon him in his hour of greatest need. Where were the Clintons, the Obamas and so many other politicians who benefitted from Harvey Weinstein's political campaign contribution largess when he needed them to pull needed strings to spring him out of the jaws of the law. And the women who lined up to bear testimony against him, some of them false of course, they too used and dumped him as they suddenly forgot how he made them who they are and without him, they would probably not have succeeded in Hollywood. 

These women were possessed by a maddening urge to get even with the man who insisted on first sleeping with them, as a quid pro quo, before giving them movies casting roles in Hollywood. So impassioned, they screamed vengeance and went forth to levy it on their former mentor. They demanded his head on a platter but never said a word about all the good things in life which they benefitted by surrendering their bodies to satisfy Harvey Weinstein's libido. They allowed him to have his way with them in order to to get somewhere in Hollywood, only to later change their mind and claim that he sexually assaulted and raped them. If indeed he actually molested and raped them and these women in fact believed it was rape and sexual molestation at the time it took place, why did they not immediately report him to the authorities. Why did they wait for several years later to bring up the issue. 

They never explained why they got the movie casting roles which they got in Hollywood, after all they were not the only women in Hollywood who possibly auditioned for those roles. If they played a fast one, a quickie with Harvey Weinstein, to get those roles, why was that not a sufficient consideration to have purchased their consent. These women were not minors at the time these dalliances took place, they were fully grown adults and none of them was an imbecile incapable of making an informed consent. So what exactly was the problem again that two adults had a sexual relationship and one of them later changed her mind and alleged sexual assault. They did not refuse, reject, resist, walk away or fought back nor did they report the matter to the police following soon after, but they are being believed that what took place then were without their consent. 

These women definitely were not the only women in Hollywood nor were they the only women Harvey Weinstein ever propositioned in Hollywood. Many other women who were  similarly asked for such a reciprocal favor probably said no, rejected his entreaties and simply walked away with their honor in tact. They sacrificed their prospective movie roles and probable nice career in Hollywood rather than give in to Harvey Weinstein's indecent proposals. Their dignity and self respect were worth more to them than getting movie casting roles in Hollywood and they chose to maintain them rather than sleep their way around with Harvey Weinstein. ICHEOKU says how about these chaste women. But the society would rather listen to the amoral women who slept their way to the top in Hollywood only to later change their minds to allege unwanted sexual assault. 

ICHEOKU says at what time exactly did they realize that they were raped or have been raped? Was it when they were actively seeking those movie casting roles and used sex as a springboard or after becoming rich and/or famous? Why were those women allowed to eat their cakes and have it back. Would those women have risen up in Hollywood if not for Harvey Weinstein and would Harvey Weinstein have given them the casting roles if they did not sleep with him. There were exchanges of favors, movie roles for sex, yet Harvey Weinstein is serving 23 years for having sex with these women while the women are allowed to keep the fame and fortune which accrued to them as a result. Why should the women be allowed to keep their own benefits but Harvey Weinstein is not allowed to also keep his own benefit. 

Is it possible that these women treated it as just sex and that having sex with Harvey Weinstein is a golden ticket in Hollywood. So, they had sex with Harvey Weinstein and they got movie casting roles from Harvey Weinstein. Both parties fully performed their contractual obligation to each other and the matter should have ended there. But no, one party changed their mind, repudiated the agreement, while still keeping the supplied consideration from Harvey Weinstein which induced them to have sex with him. If actually evaluated in the context of a quid pro quod arrangement, Harvey Weinstein should not have been convicted of these dalliances. It was a pure exchange of favors: the women yielded sex and he opened the doors of Hollywood for them. It appears that inducement for sex suddenly became such an egregious crime that a man who did it was severely punished with 23 years imprisonment. 

If these women were not somewhat complicit, convinced that it was a necessary rite of passage in Hollywood, a sacrifice which they must make in order to get somewhere in Hollywood, why did they not walk away. Why did they not reject his overtures, fight back and call the police soon after the sexual encounters took place as any innocent rape victim is expected to normally do. It would have been a different situation eliciting outright condemnation and demand for his head on a platter had these women been duped by Harvey Weinstein by his not performing his own part of the bargain after having his way with them. But each party got their term fully satisfied, only for one party to be allowed to change their mind and allege that what took place was not their will. 

Anyway, the jury of his peers have preempted and foreclosed any further arguments in defense of Harvey Weinstein. They have adjudged him guilty as charged and he is now serving a 23 years prison sentence. All ICHEOKU is doing here is merely an after the fact brain banter, not that It will change anything. ICHEOKU is only exploring a different defense theory of a mutual arrangement in which both parties satisfactorily performed their undertaking to each other, which should not have been a criminal act. The mutual exchange of considerations should have destroyed the intent element required for a crime, as Harvey Weinstein's state of mind was that he was getting his own bargained for benefit, sexual gratification, not that he was raping these women. The benefits received by these women should also have vacated their complaint that it was against their will, because they gave sex to him in exchange for getting movie casting roles in Hollywood. 

ICHEOKU says has no problem with choices which adults make, but detests a party to an agreement changing their mind so belatedly to make a complaint that it was against their will while still enjoying the benefits of the bargain. This is double dealing. These women had a choice to say no but were blinded by the allure of fame and fortune which Harvey Weinstein dangled before them. It is akin to reeling in a fish with a bait, should the fisherman be blamed for baiting the fish or the fish for being baited. Had the fish ignored the bait, it would not have been on the dinner plate. But no, it is the fisher man that is being harangued for putting a bait before the fish, begging the question, where is the justice for Harvey Weinstein or does he not deserve justice simply because he insisted that his movie casting roles came with a price, doing him sexual favors. 

For those people who argue that no implied consent should be read into the women's involvement, ICHEOKU says where was their concurrent adverse reaction against what took place. For others who argue that those women had a right to earn a living and did what they had to do, the reason they slept with Harvey Weinstein, ICHEOKU says earning a living is not constricted to only from Hollywood or courtesy of Harvey Weinstein. There are other ways to still earn a living short of sleeping with Harvey Weinstein and there were many other women who Harvey Weinstein propositioned but who turned him down. These women did not starve to death but found a way to maintain their upkeep while still keeping their honor in tact. But the get it at all cost women, who had it both ways, are being treated as if they had no involvement whatsoever in what happened. The pressure of the #MeToo trouble makers weighted heavily against Harvey Weinstein and it led to his conviction. 

At worse, Harvey Weinstein's conduct could have been immoral, reprehensible and odious; but certainly not criminal. People trade sex for favors all the time. Even some women call it the art of using what they have to get what they want. The conferred benefit by Harvey Weinstein should have been enough to input implied consent in these women and removed the conduct from the sphere of criminality. There was a reason they had sex with Harvey Weinstein not that Harvey Weinstein had sex with them against their will. People enter into odd bargains all the time and desperate people do desperate things, but should that make an otherwise purely transactional conduct criminal? 

A party to such a bargain who fulfilled his own part of the bargain should not be punished for receiving his own bargained for benefit. The inducement was not so unconscionable as to be so egregious a bargain to make. Those women were adults with full mental capacity and they had the choice to walk away. Also, unlike Bill Cosby, Harvey Weinstein did not drug any of those women to incapacitate or overwhelm their free will. So, what exactly was the beef here that sent a man away for 23 long years. 

Baring a successful appeal, the fate of Harvey Weinstein has been sealed. He is now a convicted sex offender serving a 23 years prison term. His conviction will put a further chill in many relationships between men and women in continuation of the battle of the sexes. Many men would be more circumspect in dealing with women and might become even reluctant in hiring women in order to avoid too much exposure to the wrath of the #MeToo women firing squad. 

The question should have been whether Harvey Weinstein had the right to negotiate getting sexual favors from these women with granting them access into Hollywood. He was found guilty of having sex with adults who later changed their minds and alleged rape. They succeeded in putting Harvey Weinstein away in prison, a convicted sexual pervert and he will be there for 23 long years unless he is freed on appeal. A man was convicted on the testimonies of some women who were so motivated by their vaulting ambition to make it big in Hollywood that they succumbed to fleshy temptations. They wanted what Harvey Weinstein had and Harvey Weinstein wanted something from them in return, but his own conduct was criminal? 

Harvey Weinstein's downfall is yet another testimony that no matter how powerful, rich  and influential a person might be, allegation of sexual misconduct is usually so weighty that it can easily bring the person down. It can also cause nearly every friend of the accused to abandon him as friends of Harvey Weinstein did, including Hillary Clinton. They were so afraid of the stigma that they stayed away, not attending even one trial proceedings nor had the courage to give character witness testimony in Harvey Weinstein's favor. A simple statement that 'the Harvey Weinstein they know is incapable of hurting women' would have sufficed and enough to have persuaded a different outcome or drastically reduced his sentence. 

But they were all a no show in court as they deserted him in his hour of greatest need for them, thus begging the question, what was the utility of having them as his friends and spending all the money which he spent funding their respective election campaigns. How the once powerful and wealthy Harvey Weinstein fell from grace to disgrace will someday make it into history books. It was with a helluva bang, thanks to the #MeToo loonies from hell. Life is indeed quite tragic.

JOE BIDEN IN A BASEMENT: A DEFINITION OF LEADING FROM BEHIND.

ICHEOKU says it is incomprehensible that a man who wants to lead America is hiding in a basement and you wonder whether leadership has changed its meaning. To lead presupposes being in the front and marshaling the troop or people along. But when the potential leader is no where to be found, what does anyone expects the people to do? How can a man who is running for the presidency of the United States of America not be up and about criss crossing the towns and cities of America, projecting strength, showing mental fortitude and reassuring American people that he will get their backs, if elected. 

If a leader goes into hiding and remains in hiding, what will the people do?  Does Joe Biden think that he is inspiring anyone by remaining held up in his basement with barely 91 days to election. How does he expect the people to have confidence in him that they will be protected under his leadership when he cannot even show them that he can lead by being up in the front. ICHEOKU says nobody can effectively lead a people by exhibiting such weakness, fear and timidity hiding in a basement. If Joe Biden wants to lead American people, he must show that he is not scared or afraid to lead and he must behave like a General. 

But unfortunately, it is dejavu 2016 as American people are watching the male version of Hillary Clinton, threading the same pathway to defeat which Hillary Clinton traveled in 2016. Joe Biden will not take questions, Joe Biden will not grant interviews, Joe Biden will not make public speeches, Joe Biden will not make himself available to the media, Joe Biden will not hold public events or press conferences and Joe Biden is being rather overtly managed, his speeches too scripted and his appearances over choreographed, every inch of it just like they did with Hillary Clinton in 2016. 

It is lamentable that Joe Biden's team did not take the lessons of 2016 to heart and are sheepishly using the same methodology as Hillary Clinton did in 2016. Only the same outcome is guaranteed as Joe Biden will on November 3rd 2020, similarly suffer the same fate as Hillary Clinton did in November 8th 2016. Like Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden too will be defeated by President Donald John Trump as the days of American president leading from behind is long over, it ended with Barack Obama. 

SOCIAL MEDIA GUARDIANSHIP OF TRUTH: WHOSE TRUTH IS IT ANYWAY?

ICHEOKU says truth is somewhat relative as one man's truth could sometimes be another man's falsehood. It generally depends on the context such as who is telling the truth, where the truth is being told, what the truth is about, when the truth is told and why the subject truth is told or being vetted. For instance, a  statement that the time now is 9:00 o'clock is both true and false, depending on the time zone. 

So, the fact that a person in a particular time zone where it is 9:00 o'clock said that it is 9:00 o'clock does not necessarily translate his peculiar truth to the truth of other people who are outside the time zone. Also a woman who is considered as fat in Hollywood could be considered as very thin in Louisiana or South Carolina where women are expected to have some meat to their bones, but that does not make either opinions exclusively truth or false. It is relative, as what is true somewhere does not necessarily become true elsewhere and this also applies to practically everything in life, not science based. 

When Socrates theorized that the earth was round, to the people of Ancient Greece that was heresy because the truth to them at that particular time was that the earth was flat. The debate of chicken and the egg which came first is still raging because the truth differs depending on which school of thought that is being asked. When a fly is swathed with a broom, the truth as to which particular broom stick actually killed the fly is still arguable since a particular broom stick and not all the brooms killed the fly. Another example is a person making $20,000 a year in the United States of America is considered poor in America, but the same person is considered as very rich in the slums of Delhi. 

When a person in the Bronx says it is raining and a person in Manhattan says it is not raining, whose truth is it that it is raining in New York City? It is such open ended possibilities that encourages debates and shuns herd theory as people should be allowed and encouraged to engage in debates and not follow a streamlined thought process that leads to atrophy. Social media giants are forcing American people into a tunnel visioned belief system without the courtesy of debates and such is dangerous to independent thinking. 

They want everyone to conform to a stipulated version of truth but without explaining to people whose version of truth is that and why that version of truth is superior to others. Their strong arm imposition of their will is dangerous to free and clear thinking and all rational minded people should see it for what it is without regard to partisan politics. They were allowed to establish and operate alongside traditional media, television and newspapers, but they will not allow different opinions to freely air on their platforms. It is a shocking abuse of power for these social media giants to continuously engage in this censorship and nobody made them guardians of truth and truth is not a one cap fits all entity. 

For example, when President Donald John Trump tweets that mail in ballots leads to fraudulent voting and Jack Dorsey's Twitter challenges him on the truthfulness of it by deleting the tweet, it becomes whose position is the truth? It depends on whose truth we are talking about. The president was telling a truth within his knowledge because there were many reported cases of voter fraud by mail which backed his position. But does this  mean that Jack Dorsey's Twitter lied when they challenged the veracity of what the president said as being untrue, that there is no fraud in mail in votes? 

Not really, because they do not have necessary information on voter fraud by mail in ballots which is available to the president and others who share in the president's position. Again, affirming that truth is relative and that Jack Dorsey was wrong to dismiss the president's tweet as false and unverifiable, especially when instances abound where some people have been caught and prosecuted for tampering with mail in ballots. 

ICHEOKU used to think on the absolutism of something is "either"/"or" until read the story of the six blind men of Hindustan who went to see the elephant. As always, blind people "see" things by touching and feeling them, so one of the men felt the elephant's ear and said the elephant is like a big fan. Another one touched the elephant's leg and said the elephant is like a tree; one of them touched the elephant's trunk and said the elephant is like a big snake; another touched the elephant's stomach and said the elephant is like a wall, another touched the elephant's tusk and said the elephant is like a big spear and the last one touched the elephants tail said the elephant is like a huge rope. 

They all spoke their peculiar truths relative to their personal experience but that did not make any of them right or truthful as to the nature of the elephant and they did not lie either. But were it in today's social media world none of the men would have been allowed to even hold or share their respective opinions on their perception. This is wrong and this is what the social media giants are forcing on American people, the lack of independent thinking and it is not right. When you kill a person's free thinking, you deprive the person the capacity of his humanity and make him into an unthinking zombie, a deadman walking. It destroys the humanity in him and it is not good for the American society or any other society for that matter. 

If Mark Zuckerberg, Pichal Sundararajan and Jack Dorsey were not allowed to think outside the box on human interaction and dissemination of information activities and forced to believe that it is only through television and newspapers that people get their information, Facebook, Google and Twitter would not have been in existence now. It is what led to their companies and which sustains it that they want to deprive others by forcing only one viewpoint on the people. It is not right as it leads to stagnation of thought and turns a society inwards. 

Truth can sometimes be as to some part of a story, in which case it needs to be additionally qualified. But the failure to accordingly qualify it does not make the story untrue or false. We should recall that the president did not say that all mail in ballots are fraudulent; he said some of them are fraudulent. To that extent his allusion that mail in ballots leads to fraud is both correct and truthful, because evidence of such fraudulent mail in ballots exist. 

But Jack Dorsey would rather accept a CNN and Washington Post fact checking of the president as true, disregarding the fact that the same CNN fed the nation the Russian Collusion cockamamie for nearly three years; castigated the president for saying that his campaign was spied on, declared that General Michael Flynn was guilty as sin, said that the Covington High School Nicholas Sandmann mocked the old native Indian fella and proclaimed that Bob Muller had the goose on the president. All of which later turned out to be false, yet Twitter never denounced CNN for any of these false stories and wants American people to rely on the CNN's fact check of the president's tweet. Really? 

So, how credible is CNN that their own version of truth should now surmount the president's own version of truth. But Twitter wants us to believe that CNN is their truth whisperer and that the president lies. It is what Twitter will not dare do to the leaders of Iran, North Korea, Russia and China that they gleefully do to the president of the United States of America simply because they have the freedom of expression to do so. 

Ironically it is the same freedom of expression which these social media giants enjoy and which enables them to endlessly criticize the president that they are depriving contrarians, whose viewpoints and opinions are different from their prescribed and acceptable community-conformed opinions. They gleefully ban from their platforms people who refused to be pigeonholed into particular tolerable opinions which the social media said their "community" does not approve and you ask yourself, what is the make up of the community. 

Where then is the freedom to opine freely when opinions must conform to an acceptable community's guideline. If somethings never made any reasonable sense, the control of speech by these Social Media giants definitely is one of them. They said that they are exercising their right to own media platforms and should not be regulated, yet they are regulating membership of their platforms by blocking those who have strong opinions which they consider unacceptable to their community. Whose community is that and who constitute the membership of it anyway? 

How can they expect somebody in rural Hutchinson Kansas to have or share the same opinion on things with somebody in ultra liberal San Francisco California, yet they insist you either comply with their "community" standards or be blocked from their platforms and sometimes even banned because your views in Kansas are not acceptable to their California "community" standard. It is unbelievably unimaginable that these social media giants are engaged in such lopsided requirement of conformity and without regard to the different peculiar experiences of the two places. 

If it was in China that Jack Dorsey, Mark Zuckerberg or Pichal Sundararajan did what they are doing to President Donald John Trump, they would have since been sent to a reeducation camp to have their thinking rebooted. If it was in Russia, may be they will be place on a forced time out inside one of the gulags in Siberia for an extended vacation. If it was in North Korea, Kim Jong Un's ever starving pack of wild dogs would have had a festival of some flesh meat. if it were in Iran, treason would have been a reason to break their necks with nooses inside a prison. 

But luckily for them and thankful to an American society which guarantees everyone the right to speak freely, a right which they are denying some American people, these people have the temerity to go after the president and the presidents supporters by restricting their opinions on their social media platforms. ICHEOKU says Facebook, Google and Twitter should be mindful of the fundamental freedom of expression enjoyed in America and should provide their platforms without conditions and not worry about what people choose to share thereon. It is their opinion and they reserve the right to freely express them, including on social media platforms. 

Like with telephone companies which do not regulate what people talk about on their telephones, provided their bills are paid, the Social Media platform owners should either consider charging a use fee for their services or just make it a one cap fits all place where people can freely express their opinion, regardless of the "community" touchy feelings. They should not become arbiters of truth or baby seaters of users, guarding what people say on their platforms, afterall those views are never attributed to them. A matter made more poignant because they cannot be sued for defamation or for views expressed on their platforms by third parties, thus begging the question, why do the censorship. 

The social media giants are not the police or security agencies to worry about what people post on their platforms that might amount to a criminal behavior. They should let the respective agencies worry about them and arrest the offenders when they cross the line. They should therefore get out of the way and let freedom of expression ring loud and reign supreme on their platforms. They should allow users who feel incensed or contradicted by anyone's post to challenge the expressed thoughts with their own counter argument, but not play their savior by canceling them. It is not right and it is not fair to spirited debates. Enough of the censorship.

OBAMA SEEKING REVENGE AGAINST TRUMP: BUT HE WILL BE HUMILIATED AGAIN.

ICHEOKU says it does not take an advanced degree in psychology to know that former President Barack Hussein Obama is driven, in his current effort to get Joe Biden elected, by his desire to get even with Trump and avenge the humiliating defeat of his Hillary Clinton in 2016. It was a personal affront to his boastful assurances that Donald John Trump can NEVER be elected president under his watch. It was a thumb on the nose, a smackdown and the former president has not recovered from his bruised ego. It still haunts and hurts him till today that President Donald John Trump smacked him that so hard with his election victory in 2016 and then went on to rubbish whatever legacy he wanted Hillary Clinton to maintain. 

For a man who does not take being slighted very well, he is still very sad, angry and dejected that Donald John Trump is in the White House against all odds and he cannot wait to get him out. The reason he has been talking smack about the president for a long time now and used an otherwise solemn occasion of a funeral to go after the president with allegations, accusations and innuendos. He turned an otherwise sombre funeral meant to celebrate the life of the departed Congressman John Lewis into a political stump speech. It shows great desperation and the urgency of his now such that he abandoned every decorum expected in such a solemn occasion and used it for a highly charged inflammatory political speech. 

It is sad and it is regrettable that the former president, in his rage against President Donald John Trump, descended into such a political sewer instead of concentrating on the man for whose funeral he came to Georgia to eulogize. He disrespected John Lewis, the man of the hour for whose funeral he was there to give an eulogy as he took away attention from the deceased and placed it on his anger against the president. The occasion was supposed to be about John Lewis, the man, his life and his politics; and not about election, voting, racists or the president, period. 

It is unfortunate that nearly four years after that Barack Obama still cannot understand how a man who he once dismissed as only able to be president on a television show but never in the White House, managed to pull the rug from under him and became president and moved into the White House. Barack Obama as a sitting president in 2016, with all the powers of the office and other ancillary powers geared towards the same outcome, was unable to stop Trump's election. But he now wishfully believes that he can achieve from outside what he could not accomplish from the inside. 

ICHEOKU says a man so full of it and who sees himself as a president's maker despite absence of any record of such prowess anywhere. ICHEOKU says anybody giving Barack Obama's effort at electing Joe Biden any weight should remember why President Donald John Trump is in the White House today. His election was a statement of rejection of the Obama/Biden duo and American people do not usually go back to their vomit. 

The memory of the lackluster Obama/Biden administration is still too fresh in the mind of American people that none of them wants to relive it again. ICHEOKU says instead of Barack Obama being a helpful surrogate to the Joe Biden's campaign, he will hurt the campaign because he will be reminding American people why they voted Obama/Biden out in 2016, albeit technically, since a Hillary Clinton's government would have translated to a Barack Obama and Joe Biden's third term in office. 

A Joe Biden's government will not be any different but more of the same, so why should American people bother reinstating the rejected Obama/Biden administration. It was not a funny experience as America lost its preeminent place in the world and started leading from behind, bowing to dictators, apologizing for everything, made America despondent with hopelessness and telling American people that their best days are behind them. 

Life is a forward ever movement and there will be no going back to the Obama/Biden era which is already junked in history. November 3rd 2020 will be a repeat of November 8th 2016 and Barack Obama will be beaten again by Donald John Trump for the second time.  Unlike in once beaten twice shy, Barack Obama will be twice beaten and four times shied; and there is nothing anyone can do to stop it. Barack Obama will be totally humiliated and his ego rubbished beyond polish when Joe Biden will lose woefully, if not by worst margin as Hillary Clinton did in 2016. Barack Obama knows fully well that Joe Biden is a damaged product but he is blinded by his hatred of the president to soldier on in supporting Joe Biden, a man who he once advised not to run for the presidency, with his now infamous quote, "Joe, don't do it Joe." 

In fact it does not seem that the Democratic Party means well for America, they do not love America and seems to only want to wrestle power back just for the sake of being in power. They have no real love the American people, otherwise why did they field such an old and tired man as their presidential candidate when they had many much healthier and more viable candidates they could have chosen from in their presidential primaries. Why present a caricature Joe Biden as the best they have, except that they are using him to  bait some American voters. They were so many very astute candidates in their primaries from which they could have chosen a candidate, but they forced every one of them out in order to make way for their establishment candidate Joe Biden, despite the fact that he was not the brightest bulb in the presidential primaries chandelier. 

It was exactly the same road the Democrats traveled in 2016 with Hillary Clinton that they have embarked their present 2020 journey with Joe Biden. The result will not be any different as doing the same time repeatedly and expecting a different outcome is insanity defined. ICHEOKU says the Democrats cannot secure victory in 2020 using the same failed strategic paradigm of 2016. Like Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden is too old, sickly and has no message that resonates with American people to make them desire him so much to go to the mat for him. 

Like Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden was not the most popular candidate in the primaries and like Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden is the establishment choice not the majority of the voters' choice. Like Hillary Clinton who Barack Obama tried unsuccessfully to pull across the finish line, Joe Biden will also be difficult to put in the White House by Barack Obama. And lastly, like Hillary Clinton who was defeated by then candidate Donald John Trump, Joe Biden will also be defeated by now President Donald John Trump. 

Barack Obama is angry and petty and he is acting like a petulant spoilt brat whose toy was taken away and wants it back. He thought that the White House was his to decide who moves in after he moved out. He was so arrogant to threaten that Donald John Trump will never be elected president under his watch. He goaded the president into running for the presidency through many boastful banters. He spied on then candidate Donald John Trump in a bid to uncover some dirt and use it against him to ensure that he did not win the 2016 election but was trumped. It is probable that he is once again spying on the president once again in this 2020 election, using whatever tool that may still be available to him. His biggest problem is his ego and he is desperately trying to redeem it by defeating the president as a get even pay back. 

But he will not succeed and he was rubbished in 2016 so shall he again be humiliated this November 3rd, 2020. As he rudely found out in 2016 that he did not have much influence or say in who gets to move into the White House, so shall the 2020 election be determined by the American people, his hyperventilating against the president notwithstanding. He once ascribed to himself the power to determine who will be elected president in order to preserve his legacy, but found out the hard way that certain things are beyond any one person's control. 

Now with less than 100 days to the election, his eyes are hot red as he seeks to take his pound of flesh by defeating the man who defeated his legacy. But American people will not allow Barack Obama to have his way because they know that he is just in it for his personal ego tripping, nothing more. The good news however is that a second defeat awaits him on November 3rd and from which he may never recover because it will be humiliatingly very crestfallen. 

KAMALA HARRIS IS NOT THE ONE: DOUBTFUL OF HER ODDS.

ICHEOKU says is staking everything that Kamala Harris is not the one and will not be Joe Biden's vice presidential pick. She brings nothing to the ticket, not star power and not mega fund raising. She is from California and California is already Joe Biden's. She is black but not loved in the black community because she is not down with the struggle. She also locked up many marijuana users, majority of who are blacks, during her time as Attorney General of California. She cannot bring in the dough as she is a poor fund raiser without any deep rooted tentacles to Hollywood and Silicon Valley high rollers. 

She is a terrifying, mean spirited, crazed out, wild eyed feminist extraordinaire and she has no children and therefore does not know what it is to be a mother. She does not go to church, she has low moral values and she publicly dated a married man Willie Brown of San Francisco. Above all, she scared American people stiff as a mean girl with her ungracious attack of Judge Brett Kavanaugh during his Senate Supreme Court confirmation hearing. American people will not put up with her and will not accept her likewise the Hillary Clinton's wing of liberal white women of the Democratic Party. 

Therefore, her choice is dead on arrival, the reason Joe Biden had to postpone his announcement of a vice presidential pick earlier scheduled for the first week of August to a later date due to the amassed opposition against her. The trial kite he flew about her selection raised a lot of resentments and a cautious Joe Biden had to defer everything. ICHEOKU says it will not be Kamala Harris as Elizabeth Warren, Hillary Clinton and Michelle Obama stand a better chance of being chosen and are possibly the three finalists from which one will eventually emerge. But whatever happens and no matter who Joe Biden chooses, he will be defeated by President Donald John Trump on November 3rd, so he might as well just pick anybody.

UNYIELDING CORONAVIRUS USA: WHY EXACTLY IS IT THE PRESIDENT'S FAULT?

ICHEOKU says the story being told by the fake news media is that it is the fault of the president that the Chinese Wuhan coronavirus disease is spreading and not contained. But so far, nobody has said exactly what it is that the president did or failed to do that elicited the spreading of the virus or what made it his fault. The president is not Xi Jinping nor a member of the Chinese Communist Party that allowed the Wuhan coronavirus disease to escape from China and to establish roots in America. The president is also neither a scientist nor a medical researcher that he should be tasked with personally resolving the coronavirus problem. 

On his part, there was nothing Dr Anthony prescribed or demanded of the president to do in the fight against the coronavirus which the president refused, rejected or failed to do. So, why is the president still being hounded over the lingering coronavirus but the man advising him is being celebrated as the best thing to ever happened to fighting infectious diseases in America. The president has given everything requested and signed off on everything required of him by the Presidential Taskforce on Coronavirus, the State governors as well as City Mayors in the fight against the coronavirus. But despite all that the president has done to tackle the coronavirus disease, the nut jobs are still attacking him as responsible for the continuing spread of the coronavirus. 

These munchkins are pretending that Joe Biden has a secret magic wand which he will wave, if elected, to miraculously swath away the coronavirus disease. But the fact of the matter is that nobody, including Joe Biden, has a silver bullet with which to evaporate the coronavirus; a matter made worse because Joe Biden is no longer all together, both physically and mentally, and cannot dutifully lead the effort against the coronavirus. On November 3rd, American people should stay the course and reelect the president to continue the fight against the coronavirus. It is a war which he is mastering with every day that passes by and it will be a great disservice to start the war afresh. No smart people change their leader in the middle of a war and American people regard themselves as smart. 

Also, there is an increasingly threatening China to contend with and only President Donald John Trump is well disposed and has the guts to do what it will necessarily require to checkmate China. American people must not toy with their freedom as Black Lives Matter wants it all and with the support of ANTIFA will walk all over white people if Joe Biden is ever elected. They have burnt structures, looted and vandalized America. They destroyed statues, properties, churches and desecrated Holy places. They have beaten up many white people, even at airports and shopping malls. Some people have also been killed as a result of their activities. To them every white person is a fair game as their problem is not necessarily the type of politics which the white person plays, but the fact that the color of their skin is white and therefore oppressive. 

No sane person wants such a deterioration of civilization in America. Nobody wants what chased Minnesota Congresswoman Ilhan Omar away from Somalia to be reenacted here in America. Nobody wants the police to be disbanded and make way for lawlessness. Joe Biden is beholden to these radicals and Joe Biden has not condemned the violence nor renounced the support of these anarchists for his campaign. These anarchists are bent on doing America harm. Joe Biden has no energy nor the backbone to say no to them and they will have their way in his government. Only President Donald John Trump can checkmate these threatening problems. So, on November 3rd, vote like you still love and care for America; vote to support law and order, vote to reelect President Donald John Trump for a second term because he loves America dearly and he has done enough in his first term to earn an encore. #4MoreYears.