TRUMP WINS IN 2020 - MICHAEL MOORE

"There’s no question in my mind that people who stayed home, who sat on the bench in 2016, are going to pour out in 2020, in California, New York and — you know, but also in Texas and other places that Trump will probably win again. 

The problem is that he will, I believe, win the electoral states that he would need to win the presidency, because, living out there, I will tell you, his level of support has not gone down one inch. In fact, I’d say it’s even more rabid now than it was before. They are voracious in their appetite for more Donald Trump. That’s the bad news.” - Michael Moore. 

ICHEOKU says translation, Michael Moore has no faith in even his candidate who he endorsed, Bernie Sanders; and have literally surrendered; having conceded the election to President Donald John Trump, stating that the Democrats are wasting their time by even running in 2020. Well articulated. Four more years for PDJT, unopposed!

MICHAEL BLOOMBERG: NOT ELECTABLE, WILL NOT BE ELECTED.

ICHEOKU says Michael Rubens Bloomberg will not be elected president of the United States of America, not in 2020 and not at any other future time, ever. He will not even win the Democratic Party's presidential primaries nomination. He does not have the electability requisites, necessarily required of a candidate seeking the highest office in the land. He does not have the "it" factors, if one must be told. 

These barriers are somewhat insurmountable because they are inbred; he was born with them. They are above and beyond what money can wish away, that all the money to his name cannot override them. Put in another way, there is nothing he can do to get around or overcome them. As men of yore would put it, they are in his stars. The constellation and firmament are not favorably disposed to his presidential ambition that were it in Las Vegas betting circa, the odds of his winning the presidency of the United States of America will be practically, a non existent zero. 

Michael Bloomberg is a victim of certain circumstances which are beyond mitigation; and the sooner he adjust to the reality that he has embarked on a mission impossible and cannot be elected president of the United States of America, the better for him. He is an accomplished man by any standards measured. He is also a billionaire, fifty times over that money will not be a problem in prosecuting a campaign for the presidency. He was also a successful three terms Mayor of New York. So, ordinarily, he would make a good president; but to become president he has to first be elected president except that he cannot be elected president. 

He was able to accomplish the many things to his resume due to his personal abilities and doggedness. He also did not need nor required anyone's approval or consent to achieve  them. But winning the presidency of the United States of America is different as it requires the approval and consent of the American people which they give with their votes. A candidate for president must therefore first win the hearts and minds of millions of American people from across the 50 States and territories; and then come up tops in the number of Electoral College votes won in order to become president. 

Michael Bloomberg does not have what it takes to accomplish this. He does not possess   what it takes to engender himself in the hearts of the American voting public. He lacks what it takes to win a nation wide presidential election, his three terms New York mayoral election victories notwithstanding. A presidential election requires a different set of appeal than a City election because different, broader spectrum of voters are involved and to reach them, requires a different self appeal and politicking calculus. Also, while a lot of money can help him get some mileage, it will not carry him into the White House. This is where the likability factor comes in, the proverbial booster rocket which propels a candidate into the White House. 

American people love their country and they want a candidate who indeed truly loves America as they do; and who will work his or her hardest to keep his focus primarily on America. But Michael Bloomberg is a well known globalist who has been unabashedly pushing his globalist liberalism agenda for a long time. If elected, he will like to see Brussels play an increased role in America affairs and will also submit America's defense initiative under NATO control. He will also like the United Nations to have more control over America, especially America's foreign affairs initiatives. American people like their position in the world and will not like to surrender America's sovereignty to any world body. This makes Michael Bloomberg an impossible candidate to sell to rural and the fly over country, as well as to millions of other patriotic Americans on both coasts.  

But the number one reason Michael Bloomberg is unelectable is that he is Jewish. A Jew cannot and will not ever be elected president of America, at least not in this lifetime. The suspicion of them runs deep within the American society. Al Gore lost the 2000 presidential election in part because he chose Joseph Lieberman, a well known, unapologetic, orthodox Jew as his Vice Presidential candidate. American people are not ready to hand over the White House to the Jews and voted to reject Joseph Lieberman, afraid that the Jews will find a way to remove Al Gore and make way for Joe Lieberman to assume the presidency. 

American people did not want to take any chances whatsoever with such happenstance, no matter how remote the possibility;  so they concluded that voting for Al Gore will amount to tempting fate and went for Bush/Cheney. American people were not ready for such a possibility of a Jewish president in 2000 and they will not be ready for such a full frontal affront in 2020 either. In short, American people will never be ready for a Jewish president no matter however long in the future. There are so many stereotypes about  them which still persists and remains prevalent within the American society which makes other ethnicities in America overtly wary of them. 

Many American people do not like Jews enough to want any of them near the White House in a presidential capacity. Not black people, not white people, not Arabs, not Muslims, not Chinese, not Asians, not Hispanics and of course, not Christians and other peoples of faith. These Americans view the Jews with deep suspicion, afraid that nobody knows exactly what the Jewish are really about and up to; and what they could possibly do if given the presidency. The suspicion of the Jews is still quite prevalent within every micro cultural ethnicity in America and handing them the ultimate political power in America, in addition to other powers which they already hold, is simply unthinkable. It will not happen.

Many Americans complain about the too much influence which Jewish people exact over America, both internally and externally, particularly in fashioning America's foreign policy objectives. Many of these Americans are chagrined that the Jews have taken over nearly every aspect of the America society and are literally running practically everything. An open secret subject of private conversations and discussions, admitted not readily talked about openly for fear of being branded anti Semitic.

For instance, when Louis Farrakhan and Al Sharpton angrily use certain smear to denote the Jews, they are saying out loudly what millions of black Americans are thinking of and saying privately about the Jewish people. When white supremacists rage against Jews and their synagogues, they are venting bottled anger in millions of white people who see the Jews as contemptible. When Arabs take up arms against the Jews they are incensed that the Jews wants it all. 

Usually, Asians and Hispanics always cautiously follow the lead of the others, especially the two principal racial groups in America and will not vote for a Jew either. Of course, Christians who still hold Jews responsible for the killing of Jesus Christ, our Lord and Savior, will shun any Jewish candidate for president. These Americans will rally together to stop any Jew from taking over the White House, especially one who is practically Orthodox and as unapologetically Jewish as any rabbi in Jerusalem. 

Michael Bloomberg was born Jewish; he went to Jewish School; he practises Bar Mitzvah; he maintains Kosher Kitchen and he attends Synagogue. He is Jewish to the core, such that borders on orthodoxy. American people will not vote to elect a Jew as their president. It will not happen. Voting for Michael Bloomberg is akin to asking Bibi Netanyahu to move from Jerusalem to Washington DC to become the president of America. America is too much of a Christian country to hand over the White House to a Jewish man. It will not happen, period. 

Another reason Michael Bloomberg will not be elected president is that he is too short for an American president. His diminutive stature is a huge negative for him. Since the 60s, Hollywood and television have taken over practically every aspect of American lives, including how they vote. Image and optics are now everything in who gets voted into office, particularly the presidency. Americans vote for the person they will like to usher into their homes for dinner or go out for a drink with. Voting has become a way for channeling our inner desires and short people are not usually any body's first choice. Just take the count from John F. Kennedy, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter,  Ronald Reagan, George Bush Sr,  Bill Clinton, George Bush Jr, Barack Obama and now Donald John Trump. They all have one thing in common, they are all tall fellas and above six feet tall. But Michael Bloomberg merely made it out of dwarfism and not tall enough for an American president.

Also an American president, as the leader of the free world, is expected to project strength, authority and power; and nothing does this better than a tall fella. Such an American president must be tall enough to look down on the heads of other world leaders and breath down heavily on them, if and when he must. But at a mere petite 5' 8" tall, Michael Bloomberg is not tall enough for an American president and is rather too short to stand tall as a world leader. Put in another way, Michael Bloomberg is barely as tall as Anthony Scaramucci and American people do not vote Lilliputians for president.

The next reason Michael Bloomberg will not be elected president is that he is a bachelor-divorcee. He is not married and has no First Lady in the waiting, assuming in the most unlikely event he miraculously wins. Michael Bloomberg has no wife who will become America's First Lady, a position which has grown in such significance that it has become an integral part of the presidency. Such a vacuum will not be tolerated, especially not by American women who have since been participating in presidential governance through the office of the First Lady. American women will vote to reject such a man without a wife and by extension, no First Lady, as their president and Michael Bloomberg has no wife. 

For those who may counter by saying that Pete Buttgieg also has no wife who would occupy the office of the First Lady should he magically win, ICHEOKU says he has a wife, a male wife; admitted he too will not satisfy the need to have a Lady in the White House. American women will not accept a First Man in place of the traditional First Lady or to fulfill the role normally reserved for a female presidential spouse. The argument will be that President Pete Buttigieg is already the First Man and having another First Man or two First Men in the White House is an anomaly. Such will deprive American women their rightful representation in the White House; unlike if there was a female president, in which case it will be Madam President and the First Man. Cory Booker is similarly disqualified as well.

The fifth reason Michael Bloomberg will not be elected president is that he will not win the nomination of the Democratic Party and will not have a platform to run on. He is not a bona fide member of the Democratic Party and will not be allowed to purchase the nomination of the party. He was a member of the Republican Party all his life, although he once nursed the Independent idea and now wants to buy the presidential nomination of the Democratic Party. But unlike the Republican Party which is an all comers party, a truly democratic party in the real sense of it; the Democratic Party is democratic in name only and controlled by henchmen and women, who farms out positions to only trusted underlying. It is a party where respect to party's hierarchy is demanded and ruthlessly maintained. 

Those folks who call the shots in the Democratic Party will, when the time comes, remind Michael Bloomberg that he is a charlatan who is not welcomed to their party. They will not allow him to hijack their party's presidential ticket, it will not happen. Bernie Sanders learned it the hard way in 2016 when he was rigged out of the presidential primaries, mainly because he was an Independent and not one of them. But whether Bernie Sanders re-registered as a Democrat or is still running as an Independent socialist, ICHEOKU does not know; but says it was his Achilles heels in 2016. Bernie, not being a party member and proven party loyalist, the Democrats top guns couldn't trust him with their party's presidential ticket. 

Further, Michael Bloomberg insulted all the Democratic presidential candidates when he  said that the reason he entered the race is because none of them can beat President Donald John Trump. ICHEOKU says if they cannot, what makes Michael Bloomberg the giant slayer or does he think Ross Perot did not have enough money when he tried? It is height of arrogance and the Democratic Party must frown at such condescending put down of their candidates. Unless the Democratic Party's presidential nomination is now a commodity with a price tag, Michael Bloomberg must not be allowed to purchase the nomination. He should be rejected and told to take a hike as his attempt to buy the nomination is also an insult to the Democratic Party ideals as presidential nomination is not and should not ever be for sale. He also feels that he is too big to be in the primaries.

ICHEOKU says the seventh reason Michael Bloomberg will not be elected president is that a major voting bloc of the Democratic Party, black Americans, do not like him and will not vote for him. Michael Bloomberg is not down with the struggle and he repeatedly showed this during his time as Mayor of New York. His  "Stop and Frisk" mostly affected black people, who were frequently targeted for stops and intrusive searches. Many of them ended up in arrest, incarceration, loss of jobs, separation from families and friends. Will they ever forgive Michael Bloomberg for this, ICHEOKU says does not think so. Then add Michael Bloomberg's penchant for always telling people what to do: his control of the size of soda drinks which Americans can buy in New York City. He also banned smoking.  

Anyway for a man who said that China is a democracy, may be he wishes to also control American people the same way the Chinese Communist Party controls the Chinese people, completely emasculated and fully shackled. Then add his remarks that poor people should be kept poor for their own good; and recently the disclosure that his campaign is using cheap prison labor for their robot calls. But there is some good that came out of his running for president. It is a good opportunity for redistribution of some of his wealth. At least some people will benefit and make some money working for the campaign. On which note, ICHEOKU welcomes Mayor Michael Bloomberg's participation in the Democratic Party's presidential primaries. At least he will get an honorable mention as an also ran presidential candidate. 

CHRISTIANITY TODAY: MARK GALLI'S CHRISTIANITY IS NOT OF CHRIST.

ICHEOKU says how can any sane person, especially one allegedly following in the footsteps of our Lord and Master Jesus Christ ever diminish the killing of Christians enemy number one Abu al Baghdadi and making it and all the other accomplishments of President Donald John Trump, lesser than a mere telephone call to Ukraine. A matter made worse because this fella did not even condemn the corruption of Joe Biden and son Hunter Biden, but went through the same selective indignation talking point, that the president asked for the investigation of his political opponent. 

ICHEOKU says but the crime which led to the requested investigation is being ignored by all these hack partisans, who have chosen to ignore and refused to address it. If the president asked for the investigation of his political opponent, what did his political opponent do that warrants looking into? But a fella who is supposedly a Christian, conveniently decided to overlook the underlying criminal act, the precursor to the requested investigation; yet wants American people to believe that he acted without malice to the president in writing his editorial from hell. 

If the president had political opponents in mind when he requested the investigation of the Biden father and son corruption duo, he would have started with investigating Queen Crooked Hillary Clinton, afterall she did a lot of dirty deeds involving Ukrainian officials. The accusation is made more more disheartening because President Donald John Trump does not need any Ukrainian help to trounce the infirmities of old age afflicted Joe Biden; not after what he did to the Clinton and Bush family political dynasties, as well as a sitting President Barack Obama in 2016. ICHEOKU says demolishing mentally depreciated Joe Biden will be a piece of cake and walk in the park as Joe is not a formidable opponent.

But all these anti Trump and Never Trumpers Deep Staters want American people to believe that the reason the president asked the Ukrainian president to "do us a favor" is to help him defeat Joe Biden. Who has Joe Biden ever defeated in any election outside Delaware that now makes him such an indomitable political foe that would require an Ukrainian help to vanquish? This fella got his head all screwed up for demeaning all that the president has done for both Christians and the American people; putting them in the thrash and beneath his imaginary moral turpitude of the president. 

What would Jesus do faced with similar circumstances? ICHEOKU says Jesus would look at the apparent reason for the requested investigation and would also condemn the crime of Joe Biden and son Hunter Biden. Jesus would also not waste his time second guessing a political motive, because what Joe Bide and his son Hunter Biden did is apparent and it is a criminal act. Crimes are usually investigated and that should be the foundational reason for the requested investigation, period. 

But this fella latched unto an already litigated past indiscretions of the president to pounce on him with his sanctimonious holier than thou inanities. Where was his Christian faith in repentance and forgiveness of sins not to know that the president has changed from his old ways and now professes Christianity. Saul was murdering Christians before God called him and made him Paul; ditto Mary Magdalene the prostitute and Matthew the tax collector. Our Lord Jesus said in Mark 2:17 that he did not come for those who are well, but that the sick may get salvation. The Prodigal Son in Luke 15:11-32 teaches us about new beginning; and that it is not how long our sins lasted that is important, but that we are able to overcome it and face the way that leads to righteousness. 

God is happier with a repented sinner than a sinner who perpetually confesses his unwillingness to change course or literary declares him or herself an unbelieving atheist and agnostic who will be happy to burn in hell like Ronald Reagan Jr. So, while angels live in heaven and will not come down on earth to govern mankind, a repented sinner will always be the nearest best thing, a better and preferred alternative to preside over us. The realization by a sinner to sin no more or to identify certain things as sinful is always a good acceptable first step and this imperative makes President Donald John Trump good enough and a perfect president for the United States of America. 

At least the president identifies himself as a Christian and aligns himself with the school of thought that proclaims killing of babies is sinful. The president have in addition, taken many steps to reduce infanticides rates at abortion clinics that festoon the land, as well as those overseas, by cutting funds to them. The president have thus established his full credentials as a Christian bona fides and beyond any shadow of doubt. This fella should have taken it into consideration before embarking on his wild goose chase to crucify an innocent man whose sins were washed away a long time ago, following his acceptance of Jesus Christ as his Lord and Savior.

ICHEOKU says who does this fella want as president or does he prefer and wishes that Queen Crooked Hillary Clinton had won? Who would he choose from the pack of the Democratic Party candidates currently jostling for an opportunity to run for the office, that is less immoral than the president, when all of them support the killing of babies. How would Matthew 19:14 be fulfilled when babies are being slaughtered in abortion clinics in America with these peoples' support, consent and approval? 

It is not just about Mark Galli stipulating what Mayor Pete Buttigieg calls setting a purist test which nobody can pass, but under the circumstances in which we found ourselves in America, where religiosity is fast fading to the background, who would he have preferred as president. In casting stone against the president, he forgot the admonition of Jesus Christ in John 8:7 and Luke 6:37, yet he is a Christian and hates like sin. 

Would he have preferred those who are ashamed of Christianity or a president who at least still professes Christianity? Would he prefer those who hate to be perceived as having any relationship with Christianity to a president who still publicly identifies with Christianity, in view of what Jesus said in Luke 8:50. Would this fella have preferred those who would rather see Christianity wiped off the face of the earth to a president who has done more for and to protect Christianity than all his predecessors put together. Would he prefer those who argue that Crosses and religious symbols should be taken down from public spaces and that God must be taken out of schools, government and even our lives, to a president who is a staunch advocate of God's supremacy in our lives and society. 

Mr Mark Galli should remember too that nobody is perfect and that an angel will not come down from heaven to occupy the White House. So our option is limited to what we have available; and when left to choose between two evils, the lesser evil is always the play. If we cannot get 100%, at least 75% is good enough; instead of 0% or at most 21%. We deal with what we are given and if lemons, we make lemonades; but without citrus, we cannot make any drink. 

But Mark Galli did not write any morality editorial against nor called for Pete Buttigieg, an openly homosexual gay man running for president, to drop out of the race because gaydom is immoral. Ditto Virginia Governor Ralph Northam who killed babies and advocated for the killing of fully formed babies, who has not been similarly excoriated by Mark Galli's editorial, calling for his removal from office. 

Certain things are just crass politics and so obvious, so subjective. ICHEOKU says unless Mark Galli is presenting his holier than thou self in next year's presidential election as a candidate, his call for the removal of the president is rather presumptuous, baseless, faulty and lacking in every objectivity. He kept silent for more than three years and suddenly now wants the president removed from office with less than ten months to go; and you ask yourself why not wait for the election that is almost here. But Mark Galli is part of the swamp and was only kowtowing the directive of the Deep State to editorialize for the removal the president now, otherwise he will win a reelection on November 3rd, 2020. 

If according to Mark Galli, the Christian Today's usual approach is to stay above the fray of politics, what suddenly changed that made them to dive headlong into politics now? Were the founder of Christian Today, Bill Graham, alive today, would he concur with the editorial opinion which Mark Galli put up on CT? A hit job piece which Bill Graham's son, Franklin Graham, has already repudiated as not being what his father would have appreciated. 

Like the crazy Nancy Pelosi who always intones "I pray for the president", albeit sarcastically; Mark Galli claims that he loves and prays for the president; yet he called the president immoral and wants him removed from office. Query, what is so "immoral" in the president asking for the investigation of a crime committed by Joe Biden that deserves his being removed from office? With a love like Mark Galli's, the president does need any other hatred. Speaking of "loving" the president, where was Mark Galli's condemnation of the House Democrats rushed impeachment of the president, after what Mark Galli himself acknowledged was a hatchet job, done without giving the president any opportunity to defend himself? 

ICHEOKU says it becomes much doubtful to believe that Mark Galli is indeed a true follower of Jesus Christ, if after his reading of the telephone transcript he still came to the conclusion that the president "attempted to use his political power to coerce a foreign leader to harass and discredit the president's political opponent." 

Where was the coercion in the transcript and where was the harassment solicited for? Instead of condemning what Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden did to Ukraine, extortion and bribery, which ordinarily are against Christianity teachings and values, the real McCoy of immoral acts, this fella is channeling the liberal talking point "the president want to investigate his political opponent." They calculatedly maintain a blind eye to the crimes of the Biden father and son duo; but are rather more interested in hounding a president for merely asking that the crime be investigated. So what manner of a Christian is this Mark Galli who selectively chooses what to condemn as immoral or is extortion and bribery now morally acceptable by his brand of Christianity as virtuous? 

ICHEOKU says from the litany of mark Galli's complaints against the president and which he considers "immoral", it is obvious that political motivation cannot be completely excluded nor ruled out from his editorial hit piece. So what, if the president mistakenly hired some people with questionable characters? What is imperative and of paramount character content is what the president did upon learning of their not so kosher history. He did the right thing, as would any good moral person; he fired them. That is what good people do, they react appropriately when unfolding circumstances produce facts of consequences which forces a change of mind. 

It is also farcical for Mark Galli to falsely claim that the president "remains proud" of some of his past indiscretions, especially when there is no evidence to that effect. This further shows that his editorial piece in Christianity Today was purposely crafted to impugn, malign and disparage the president. Possibly, Mark Galli is the latest hire of the Deep State in their attempt to get the president; believing that his Christian background as editor of Christianity Today gives him some air of credibility and believability. 

The Deep State's thinking must be that American people would say since it was in Christianity Today, it must therefore be true and therefore the president should be removed from office. But once again, their attempt to break the bond which exists between the president and the American people, particularly those who identify themselves as evangelical Christians, will fail woefully because American people are smarter than all the tricks the Deep Staters are playing to ensnare them. 

Further, whatever relationships the president had with women were in the past and long before he became president. So why would Mark Galli suddenly decide to resurrect them now as one reason in his editorial piece why he wants the president removed from office. This alone defeats his argument of lack of bias and unmasks his pretentiousness on his real motive for the editorial hit job. Why dredge up things that happened over several decades ago which has been previously conclusively litigated before American people and use it to attack the president as if they just happened. 

Where was Mark Galli when all of these allegations were still fleshly unfolding during the 2016 election campaign? Where was Mark Galli's editorial in condemnation of Queen Crooked Hillary Clinton deleting and bleach-washing of 33,000 subpoenaed emails. Mark Galli also attacked the president's Twitter presence as a "habitual strings of mischaracterizations, lies and slanders" and he has no basis for this subjective opinion.  Now, can somebody please tell ICHEOKU that this fella is not actively working for the Democratic Party or would any rational person attribute an impartial  clear conscience to this editorial piece?  Now, he is mislabeling the president's Twitter use and asking that he be removed from office for exercising his freedom of speech right.

Mark Galli is a partisan hack and a hired gun of the Deep State. imagine his claim that the impeachment hearings made it "absolutely clear" that Trump abused his office; when the same Mark Galli in a previous paragraph of his editorial, admitted that the president was not allowed representation or the ability to defend himself during the impeachment persecution. Then ask yourself, how then could the same skewed impeachment hearings make the president's culpability "absolutely clear", when the president never defended nor was allowed to rebut any of the trumped up charges against him. What manner of judgment call is this, when in one hand, Mark Galli is giving and with the other hand, taking the same thing he was giving; and still shamelessly passes judgment in condemnation of the president, based on this set of consequential facts. 

This fella was also ready to dismiss all the record accomplishments of the president as pale, in comparison to a mere telephone call with Ukrainian president; including a fabulous economy, two Supreme Court Justices, Veterans Act, Prison reform, Abu Baghdadi killed, ISIS decimation, numerous trade deals etc. ICHEOKU says just listen to his characterization of the president, "None of the president's positives can balance the moral and political danger we face under a leader of such "grossly immoral character." ICHEOKU says if this man is not a card carrying Democrat, nobody else is; and it is obvious from his language and carefully chosen words that he is a liberal nut job masquerading as an evangelist. 

He did not even give the president credit for being an exception to his assertion that "politicians are notorious for breaking campaign promises"; the president having kept nearly all his campaign promises plus more. Also his attempt to make a comparison with what led to Bill Clinton's 1998 impeachment is another example of his being economical with the truth. Bill Clinton actually committed a crime of perjury; unlike Trump who merely asked for a crime to be investigated, which is not a crime by itself. 

Unlike Bill Clinton, President Donald John Trump did not lie about the phone call nor asked anybody to lie about it. He also released the transcript of the phone call in addition for everybody to see what transpired and there was nothing impeachable therein. Also, Bill Clinton was not impeached for having sex in the White House with an intern Monica Lewinsky; no, he was impeached for lying about it and for asking other people to lie about it. A perjury and suborning perjury, two definitive crimes. 

So, where is the moral equivalence which Mark Galli was desperately trying to make between Bill Clinton's impeachment and the telephone call which President Trump made to the Ukrainian president. Where was the breach of trust by the president or the crime he allegedly committed by asking that a criminal act of the Biden father and son corruption duo be investigated?  Imagine Mark Galli making such an over-broad statement, "unsavory dealings and immoral acts by the president and those close to him have rendered this administration unable to lead"; and you ask yourself how many "unsavory dealings and immoral acts" occurred? 

This fella is supposedly a Christian and he is making things up like Adam Schiff. Who even made this fella the whisperer in chief of the American people who elected President Trump and put him in office, to know what American people want by calling for the removal of their president from office. How dare him? How can this man even compare the evil of abortions to a character flaw which he hyped as "blackened, bent and broken"; aware that no man or woman is infallible or was he expecting a Messiah in the White House. 

ICHEOKU says good enough Mr Mark Galli subsequently confessed that he is not a Trump supporter and has merely been tolerating the feelings and opinions of those evangelical Christians who are supporters of the president. In his own words, "we have done our best to give evangelical Trump supporters their due, to try to understand their point of view, to see the prudential nature of so many political decisions they have made regarding Trump." Unfortunately, it would seem that Mr Mark Galli, like his other fellow Never Trumpers, facing an inevitable Trump's reelection on November 3rd, 2020, could not take it anymore and he decided on an outburst.

A pitiful partisan and a Never Trumper extraordinaire; yet some people are attaching some merit, relevance and importance to his editorial piece and passing it off as gospel and reflective of the evangelical community in America. ICHEOKU says far be it that Mark Galli speaks for the evangelical community in America. It will be akin to CNN speaking for American people when only about 300,000 Americans including those held hostage to CNN at airports, less than 0.3% of the population, tune in to their hogwash fake news propaganda nightly.

Anyway, the other good news is that editorial opinions do not generally reflect American people's sentiments and thinking; nor do they affect anything American people do. The numerous editorial opinions in 2016 did not sway American people in the 2016 election, otherwise Queen Crooked Hillary Clinton would be in the White House today. ICHEOKU recalls that in 2016, practically every newspaper and magazine of record in America editorialized against electing Donald John Trump and urged American people not to vote for him. But on the night of November 8th, 2016, American people told them to stuff it in their you know where and took their country back from globalists, anti America forces who were bent on humiliating America. 

ICHEOKU says the patriotic fervor displayed by American people with their votes on November 8th, 2016 will be reenacted in 2020. As it was in 2016, so shall it be repeated in 2020. American people have seen in President Donald John Trump that their decision in 2016 was the right one and that they did not make a mistake. Therefore, regardless of what this creepy editor of Christianity Today wishes, President Donald John Trump will not be removed from office and he will win the November 3rd 2020 presidential election, his reelection for a second term. What a jerk Mark Galli is, a hack partisan, anti Trump Never Trumper liberal Democrat and a stooge of the Deep State, who does not mean well for America. it is delightful that he has tendered his resignation or is it retirement; good riddance; away with him and his editorial opinion.

IMPEACHMENT TRIAL: NANCY PELOSI MUST NOT BE ALLOWED A DO OVER.

ICHEOKU says Madam Speaker Nancy Pelosi had all the time and opportunity in the world to get her acts right, together and conduct a fair and transparent impeachment of the president but bungled it. She rush through a sham impeachment to ensure that House Democrats voted before the holidays, when they would have had the opportunity to hear from their constituents, who do not want the president impeached and thus would have voted differently or like Tulsi Gabbard voted present. 

But Madam Speaker was under heavy pleasure from LGBTQ and other crazed out, wild eyed, liberal donors and activists wing of the Democratic Party, who wanted the president impeached and needed such deliverable tendered immediately, before they can continue bankrolling the Democratic Party. She caved in and the result was an impeachment that was technically no impeachment at all; and thus embarrassed, Madam Speaker is trying to fix the impeachment by demanding a restart of the impeachment hearing and probably  its investigation, de novo in the Senate. Nobody forced nor pressured her to rush through the impeachment and if in fact she needed more witnesses and evidence, she would have allowed the courts to rule on the motions before it on the legality of the president not providing some witnesses and producing some documents which were requested by the House of Representatives. 

But Madam Speaker decided to ignore what is a normal process of adjudicating issues and controversies in courts and went forth to impeach the president with whatever evidence she had and considered sufficient. Therefore it begs the question why she is now asking that more witnesses be called in the Senate, which technically shows that she impeached the president with insufficient evidence, when she should not have done so. Madam Speaker is trying so desperately to tele-guide and dictate to the Senate on how to do its job of conducting the impeachment trail, by insisting that certain assurances be given to her before she will transmit the Articles of Impeachment to them. Madam Speaker is contravening an imperative under the law of impeachment, which designates the Senate as the exclusive legislative chamber to conduct the trial of an impeached president. It also did not condition this duty on the emotional foibles of Madam Speaker. 

Therefore, what Madam Speaker is trying to do, seeking to usurp the duty of the Senate, is unprecedented; and must not be allowed to stand, otherwise she will be setting yet another bad precedent where the lower House of Representatives now controls and dictates to the upper House, Senate. Such an obfuscation was never intended by the founding fathers who bequeathed on the Senate the calming powers over sometimes impulsive acts of an otherwise ever restive Congress. Madam Speaker has already set a bad precedent when she drastically lowered the bar and threshold for impeachment by impeaching the president for a perfect phone call and should not be allowed to increase the tally of such bad precedents, by illegally withholding the Articles of Impeachment, pending a reciprocity that meets her desires. 

Under no circumstance are the powers of the House of Representatives superior to the Senate's, particularly on matter of impeachment of the president; and Madam Speaker will not be allowed to manufacture such an adjunct powers now. Except Madam Speaker is tardy, she should have since appointed the House managers of the impeachment trial and as soon as she flagged off the impeachment hearing. They should have been waiting to spring it over to the Senate as soon as the votes were affirmative. Madam Speaker must therefore not be allowed to make it up as she goes, because there are rules and precedents governing an impeachment of a president as this is not the first time the House ever impeached a president. It is either she conforms or the impeachment is a dud, since it never made it to the Senate as required by the Constitution. 

Madam Speakers' powers over the impeachment ended when the votes to impeach the president were tallied and collated. Thereafter, the power over the conduct of the trial of the impeached president automatically vests in the Senate. Therefore, Madam Speaker holding over the Articles of Impeachment is ultra vires her powers as Speaker, as she has no right to do so, period. What she is doing by withholding the Articles of Impeachment amounts to usurpation of powers of the Senate, which she is denying their constitutionally vested authority to sit in judgment over an impeached president. If Madam Speaker wants to "unimpeach" the president, that will be a different thing; but having already impeached the president, she must comply forthwith and without more or preconditions or demands, to the law, by transmitting the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate. 

This is a non negotiable duty of the Speaker; it is imperative and not subject to any qualifications whatsoever. Madam Speaker Nancy Pelosi overreached herself and arbitrary extended her authority by demanding that the Senate provide her their template for conducting the trial, their duty, of the president before she will release the Articles of Impeachment to them. Madam Speaker is not doing the Senate a favor by complying with a requirement of the Constitution and her present stand off amounts to a shakedown and blackmail; aka the quid pro quo and bribery which she accused the president of. A duty is an obligation and not a privilege which is discretionary and demands absolutism in compliance. So Madam Speaker Nancy Pelosi has no basis both in fact and law as well as precedents, to take the Articles of Impeachment hostage to her whims and caprices. 

Therefore Madam Speaker Nancy Pelosi must do her duty and transmit the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate pronto; and without any further ado or delay, regardless of how she feels about its destined outcome. Unfortunately for Madam Speaker Nancy Pelosi and luckily for American people, Charles Schumer is not the Senate Majority Leader; so justice will be done to the unjust impeachment and the president will be set free. ICHEOKU never knew how crazed out this woman is until this impeachment hoopla assumed a life. Madam Speaker Nancy Pelosi is a crazed out, wild eyed, feminist numero uno from the foremost liberal American City of San Francisco and has left nobody in doubt that her credentials were well earned. The woman is a handful and indeed something else; which reminds ICHEOKU of the funny way she stretched her hands and formed her hands when she was clapping for the president at the last State of the Union address. Simply incredible and mired in incredulity.  

IMPEACHED AND UNLEASHED: TRUMP NOW FREE TO PROSECUTE HIS AGENDA.

ICHEOKU says free at last, free at last, thank God almighty the president is free at last. Now that he has been impeached, President Donald John Trump is no longer afraid of being impeached. Impeachment is now in his rear view mirror as he has been freed from the shackles of fear of possible impeachment by a very hostile House Democrats led by Madam Speaker Nancy Pelosi. 

This fear kept the president constrained, circumspect, somewhat worried and deferring too much to House Democrats, believing that such courtesy would deflate their threat of impeachment. But the House Democrats have done their worse by still impeaching the president and now, all bets are over. The president will now charge full throttle with prosecuting his America First agenda, unapologetic; and to hell with the inhibitions of the House Democrats and political correctness. 

Madam Speaker Nancy Pelosi successfully engineered the impeachment of a president who did nothing wrong and at worst, nothing of such a magnitude or so egregious as should warrant impeachment. But an agenda driven crazy Nancy proceeded anyway, just to satisfy her crazed out, wild eyed feminists, liberal nut jobs who are still smarting that the president humiliated their Queen Crooked Hillary Clinton in November 8th 2016 election and have been demanding a payback ever since. Anyway, after impeachment, now what? What else can those angry House Democrats do to the president after they have fired their one only best shot, but the president is still standing, kill him? 

Although, they impeached him but he is going no where nor leaving the White House any time soon nor earlier than January 2025. So until then, the president will, in addition to his White House residency, continue to live rent free in the heads of the Democrats and will continue to drive them crazy. So, the wise counsel not to impeach the president would have prevailed on Nancy Pelosi, but she was possessed by a vengeful demonic spirit of retaliation and she proceeded to cut her pound of flesh. 

Since nothing changed nor would ever change about the president's status, why impeach him? Why impeach him if the status quo ante will still be maintained or is the sound bite of "IMPEACHED"  enough consolation prize? Yes, the House Democrats pronounced him impeached, but until the Articles of Impeachment is transmitted to the Senate for them to act on it in some fashion as constitutionally prescribed, the president has not yet been impeached. 

At best, as prosecutors normally do with suspects, the House of Representatives merely declared their intention to prosecute the president following the conclusion of their investigation. But until the president is charged in the court of the Senate, by presenting the Articles of Impeachment before therein, the process of having him impeached is still ongoing, but not yet accomplished. Moreso, there is nothing like a partial impeachment in the Constitution or that is known to law, which could have given the House Democrats some joyous satisfaction. 

So, it is either they impeach him by transmitting the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate as required or they chose not to impeach him by allowing their purported impeachment to wither off in Nancy Pelosi's office drawers. Therefore, until the full performance of a constitutional requirement by Madam Speaker is carried out, the president has not been impeached. It is mandatory and not subject to the comical relief or emotional roller-coasting dictates of Madam Speaker. 

ICHEOKU says the day before the impeachment, Trump was the president. On the day of impeachment Trump is the president and on the day after the impeachment Trump still remains the president; and will continue to so until January 2025. So, what exactly did the House Democrats achieve by this their misguided and hateful impeachment of a president who did nothing wrong nor that was impeachable. 

What a waste of valuable time, spent pursuing phantom, fueled by rage, anger, jealousy, envy and hatred of a president whose only mortal sin was winning an election which was "reserved" for Queen Crooked Hillary Clinton. Why impeach a president who loves America so passionately and wants to do better for America by making America great again. 

A patriotic president who believes that charity begins from home and has refocused the attention of the American government back on America and Americans with his America First policy for the revival of America. America is back and being made great again courtesy of President Donald John Trump, but these anarchist House Democrats, meddlesome interlopers, who love other countries more than they love their own country, are in the way trying to sabotage the president's effort. 

They were disgracefully disappointed when their continuing effort to diminish America was busted by the president on November 8, 2016 and they desperately yearned for a payback ever since. They have been scheming to get even with the president and finally manufactured the Ukrainian telephone call scandal as a subterfuge to carry out their impeachment. 

ICHEOKU says no rational and/or reasonable American is fooled by the fire on the mountain hoopla of the impeachment from hell, delivered one week from Christmas and intended to be the Grinch that stole American peoples Christmas, because it is farcical, meritless and baseless. American people are smarter than the Democrats give them credit for and they know exactly what happened that led up to this impeachment. American people are not the unthinking hillbillies and cave dwellers with minimal imbecile's IQ, which the elitist Democrats take them for. 

American people can think for themselves to know what took place and they know that the House Democrats acted out of pure malice and political vendetta. American people saw through the spiteful lowering of the impeachment bar by Madam Speaker Nancy Pelosi just to get even with a Stephen who she hates and dislikes, her denial to the contrary notwithstanding. 

A president who made her and her pack of crazed out wild eyed feminist nut jobs  incensed by winning a presidency which their Queen of Spades Crooked Hillary Clinton was supposed to win or rather bequeathed with. Like Greta Thunberg disrespectfully said to world leaders, the Democrats thundered to the president, how dare you? Like the pack of wild dogs and hyenas they are, the Democrats sank their teeth of impeachment into the president and never let go until they did it or partially or in the process of doing. They feverishly yelped impeach him, impeach 45, impeach the motherfucker, impeach him to prevent his reelection, impeach him because he is orange and such other sundry impeach him inanities until they finally got their wish fulfilled, mission accomplished. 

What else can they do to the president other than to surrender to the blitzkrieg of his Make America Great Again agenda, very illustrative of he who laughs last, laughs best. With all the inhibition now rested, the president can now go forth to wow and amaze  American people with the implementation of his patriotic agenda and to the fullest. ICHEOKU can imagine a president now feeling much relieved that the sword of Damocles  hanging over his head all this while has been struck without spilling his blood nor separating his neck from his shoulders. 

What a loser the House Democrats are who never advised themselves properly that their impeachment of the president for no apparent impeachable reason will only make him stronger, larger, huger and even more likable by the American people, who will now give him more sympathetic ears. 

The House Democrats wing of the Deep State struck at the president with their impeachment in order to intimidate the president and weaken the president's resolve to take the Deep State down and dismantle their stranglehold on America. In desperation, they are exploiting every resources to first take the president down before he takes them down. But again they failed, as their Nancy Pelosi could not successfully execute the plot as planned and anticipated. She failed to make the case and failed to simultaneously transmit the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate. 

ICHEOKU makes bold to state that the impeachment did not damage the president as the Democrats had hoped and looked forward to. Instead, the president who is a victim of a Deep State orchestrated strike, will be reelected with an overwhelming votes of 70 million plus on November 3rd, 2020. This will send a resounding message to the sadist House Democrats that they overreached themselves when hey unreasonably lowered the impeachment bar just to get the president. 

By doing so, they trivialized the sanction of impeachment and set a bad precedent; all in their attempt to kneecap the president. It is unfortunate that House Democrats stooped so low, being short sighted and for temporary gain and advantage. The unintended consequences will be so grave for the Democrats that impeaching the president for such a trivial thing as a harmless telephone call with a foreign Ukrainian president, might not be a very good bargain. 

Meanwhile, Barack Obama did not give Ukraine those weapons and the alleged Joe Biden's intransigence took place with Obama's nod and wink, tacit approval; the reason Joe Biden told the Ukrainians to call the president if they doubt his threat to withhold loan guarantees. For 8 years during the presidency of Obama/Biden, nobody said anything about Ukraine being our "ally." Russia invaded Ukraine and seized Crimea and Eastern Ukrainian Donbass region as Obama and Biden stood down and helplessly and hopelessly watched, yet nobody said a word. 

But Trump became president and suddenly it was now all his fault, as all hell was let loose over circumstances which he neither created nor did it happen under his watch. Nobody impeached Obama for all these, but a mere delayed delivery is now so egregious as to impeach Trump? If crass hypocrisy has a human face, it will be Nancy Pelosi and her band of rabble rousing anarchists House Democrats who orchestrated this hoax of an impeachment. 

Anyway, now that the impeachment has come and gone, in its post mortem, only two things came out of it. It showed how angry the Democrats really are and the extent they could go to exert revenge. The Democrats are sad, mean and vengeful; the reason they are always look like undertakers with too many decaying corpses to take care of. Sometimes, ICHEOKU wonders if there is any really happy Democrat, except of course those who wear forced fake smile, usually purchased with indulgence in controlled substances. 

Democrats are a very melancholic bunch of people who are permanently afflicted with a never abating inner hurt. They never forgive nor forget, the reason they viciously latched unto the impeachment show of shame, insisted on all or nothing, take no prisoner outcome, until Madam Speaker Nancy Pelosi buckled under the weight of their threat to pull funding for the party. 

When everything eventually settles down, Madam Speaker Nancy Pelosi will be the only one remembered for being responsible for the sham impeachment for authorizing and allowing it to proceed. As for the tools she used, Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler, they will only remain the footnotes which they are in the impeachment script. A highly partisan pettiness which she gaveled into fruition and it showed in the response of American people, who are not happy with her and her decision to impeach a president for doing nothing impeachable. 

ICHEOKU says shame on Madam Speaker Nancy Pelosi for the somersault which she made by persecuting this impeachment and for drastically lowering the bar of impeachment. 

By impeaching the president, the House Democrats have triggered the doctrine of unintended consequences and they will someday pay a hefty price because of it. It will someday bite them in their rear orifice as it did with the Supreme Court. Harry Reid's had lowered the filibuster rule to het in Sotomayor and Keagan and it came to bite them with Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh. Also, by impeaching the president the Democrats have freed him and he can now operate more freely. 

The president no longer has any fear of impeachment inhibiting him from completely unleashing the energies of Make America Great Again agenda. The Democrats, having fired their last only shot, will now whimper and whine as the president goes to work, doing the things which he really wanted to do, but was held back by fear of provoking the ire of the Democrats. 

The biggest surprise in the impeachment sham was how easily corralled the House Democrats were. Members, who are supposedly independently representing their various constituents, but who voted to impeach the president against the wishes of their constituents not to impeach the president. They had to fall in line as instructed by Madam Speaker Nancy Pelosi just to please the party's henchmen and women who control the party from San Francisco, West Hollywood and Westside Manhattan. 

Nancy Pelosi could please her crazed out, wild eyed, liberal nut jobs in San Francisco constituents who demanded the impeachment; but how about those hardworking Western Pennsylvanian Democrats who did not want the president impeached? Are their own representatives in the House lesser than Nancy Pelosi and are they lesser than Nancy Pelosi's constituents? The last story on the impeachment has not been told as the House Democrats made a very big mistake and it will reverberate on November 3rd, 2020.

RESTORE THE REPUTATION OF THE FBI: HOLD JAMES COMEY ACCOUNTABLE.

ICHEOKU says regardless of what the government or the director of the FBI does, the integrity and reputation of the once revered law enforcement bureau will never be fully recovered nor restored without holding James Comey and his band of corrupt former FBI officials accountable. The need to do this has never been more imperative as the present and it will in addition be a deterrent to discourage any such future criminal misbehavior. 

The James Comey's FBI scandal is not only a United States of America exclusive internal affairs matter nor is it only about the victim, President Donald John Trump. No, it is beyond both entities and borders on the world wide reputation of the FBI. How does the FBI continue to enjoy, maintain and sustain its reputation as the premier law enforcement entity which it has enjoyed for over the many years of its existence? How does the FBI reassure the American people as well as its world wide partners that its investigations are not tainted and are products of pure forensic findings, not colored or impacted by personal biases. This cloud of suspicion which now hovers over the FBI must be lifted, speedily and transparently. 

So until done, people will continue to view and look at the FBI with suspicion. Although, he personally orchestrated the witch hunt against a duly elected president of the United States ofAmerica, but it impacted the entire strata of the FBI, being its director. The scandal tarnished the image of the men and women of the bureau, their standing in the society and their world wide fame too, which is now permanently tainted. This few bad apples must not be allowed to ruin it for everybody and destroy the hard won reputation of the bureau, working tirelessly to keep criminals in check. The honor of the 37,000 men and women who serve our nation at the FBI, including those who have already served and those who would likely serve in the future, are at stake. 

James Comey and the few confidants he recruited to help him orchestrate this corruption can be sacrificed in the interest of the 37,000 strong force of the bureau whose reputation are equally under the chopping block as members of the corrupt FBI. So the most efficient way to restore their reputation and the overall reputation of the bureau is to isolate those few of them who participated in the scandal and make an example out of them. Every American is waiting and watching to see how the restoration of confidence in the FBI is carried out and for a rather skeptical American society who are always cynical about the government, the scandal did not improve nor allay their fear of the government. 

This shaken confidence of the America people in one of their government bureaus must also be taken into consideration as the FBI struggles to get their reputation back. It therefore must take punitive action against those perpetrators who carried out the sabotage of the bureau's reputation in order to reassure the American society as well as the honed in world that what James Comey did was an isolated case by a rogue cop gone wild and that such is not prevalent within the bureau and that he acted out of sync and did not represent a pervasive act in the FBI. It is imperative that the FBI restores its image as the world's premier law enforcement agency by assuring everyone that the corruption witnessed under James Comey's leadership of the bureau was not system-wide and that it came with him and left with him. 

Nothing else will qualify and this is not about saving their former boss of shielding him from prosecution. No, he seizes being honorable the moment he descended into the sewer of corruption and no member of the bureau should be proud to identify with him. Instead he should be treated as a pariah who brought disrepute to the bureau and every agent and official should be up in arms against him, demanding that he be made an example out of. What he did is simply incomprehensible and should not be tolerated, no matter how measured or analyzed. Many countries of the world are today in turmoil because of rudderless political leadership who corrupted their law enforcement agencies and now uses them to either perpetuate themselves in power or hunt their opponents into extinction; thus leading to unraveling of society. 

This must also be factored in whatever the current leadership of the bureau and the government in general decide to do towards restoring the bureau's reputation. How then does people know and be convinced that there are not thousands of James Comey within the bureau, if he goes unpunished. Posterity too also demands that a deference be instituted by holding James Comey accountable, including losing his pension like Andrew McCabbe if need be. Simply put, there is no meeting of the grounds anywhere short of putting James Comey in handcuffs to assure American people that indeed, no one is above the law. Madam Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her acolytes cannot be parroting the refrain with the examples of Queen Crooked Hillary Clinton and James Comey still freely traversing the land. 

If ICHEOKU had his way, would also seize whatever proceeds that came from James Comey' "Higher Ground" book of self adoration and merited adulation, as a fruit of illegitimacy.  Such a fella as James Comey should not be allowed to profit from illegality, misleading  and knowingly lying to American people; and also for  causing such untoward  damage to the reputation of America's foremost law enforcement bureau. The Inspector General literary indicted him, except that his assignment did not come criminal indictments. James Comey is a disgrace to the FBI and the American society in whole that such a rogue cop blatancy lied and proclaimed his "innocence" when he knew that he was as guilty as sin. Somebody need to be held accountable for what took place and that person is James Comey,

NANCY PELOSI: A PERSONIFICATION OF WHAT IS WRONG WITH WOMEN.

ICHEOKU says any chance of a woman ever becoming president of the United States of America has further been diminished and delayed by what is unfolding in the House of Representatives under the leadership of Madam Speaker Nancy Pelosi. She is angry, she is petulant, she is petty, her straight faced lying is annoyingly disgusting and she has such an air of untouchability around her that she even scolds reporters for asking her questions she does not like; and then she decides what questions she wants to answer or attempts to answer whenever her clenched jaws permits air to pass through her false teeth. She also makes the rules as she went, including the manner the phony impeachment was conducted in the House of Representatives. 

For the first time in the history of impeachments, the House Intelligence committee was made the arrow head of the impeachment inquiry, instead of the traditional Judicial Committee. Her probable reason for making the switch being that she does not trust New York's Jerry Nadler enough to handle the investigation and turned to her fellow Californian anarchist Adam Schiff to lead the charge. Again, she lied to the American people that the House of Representatives was rushing through the impeachment process because of the exigency of the now that makes President Donald John Trump an existential threat to America, who should not be allowed to remain in office, not a day longer. Witnesses for the president and the Republican Party were rebuffed and refused appearance on probably her orders and every other thing associated with the maniacal hoopla were fast tracked just to speed up to the end game. 

Her corralled ravenous rabble rousers Democratic Party members of the House impeached the president, yet she is refusing to forward the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate as required by the Constitution. This is the same crazed out wild eyed feminist extraordinaire who accused the president of violating the Constitution with her now cliched "no one is above the law" refrain; but she herself is now in flagrant violation of the Constitutional requirement that Articles of Impeachment must be speedily forwarded to the Senate. Once again, she is changing the rules of the game in the middle of the game and trying to hijack the trial process in the Senate. She is of the lower chamber of Congress but wants to dictate to the upper chamber how to conduct their business' but no body dictated to her how she conducted the impeachment at the lower House.

It is unfortunate that Madam Speaker Nancy Pelosi could descend to such a low abyss just to settle a score against a president, whose only crime was that he defeated their Queen Crooked Hillary Clinton. What would this woman not do to get the president damaged, yet she claims to be a Christian and prays for the president; but supports the killing of babies and was this mean in persecuting the president. What manner of Christianity does she practice that does not heed the instructions in the Bible. It is terrifying what Nancy Pelosi did and was prepared to do with her power as Speaker of the House of Representatives. Now you know why American men and a whole lot of women are wary and not excitedly disposed to having a female president, at least not now and not in the nearest future. 

They don't abide by the rules, especially when they have an agenda, which they often do; and above all, they never take responsibility for their actions. So expecting her to make atonement for this by apologizing to the American people is not an option as she will never do it nor ever admit that she proceeded wrongly and with bad intention. ICHEOKU  used to admire this woman but not any more; especially since she elevated Alexandria Ocasio Cortez to a pedestal not ever occupied by newbie freshman member of the House. This fatal mistake led to the confusion that heralded this misguided impeachment; it was too short sighted as what goes around always has a way of coming around. ICHEOKU says shame on Madam Speaker Nancy Pelosi for taking the country through this charade and doing it with wild eyes. She is called crazy Nancy for a reason and she did not disappoint. The woman is nuts.