SAUDI ARABIA: WILL THEY EVER BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE?

ICHEOKU says will the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia ever take responsibility for their citizen terrorists, who have killed so many Americans and continuing till this day. If they cannot and will not take the initiative to rein in their bad actors, will America ever hold them accountable for their misdeeds, just like any other country that sponsors terrorist acts against America. 

The depraved heart murders in Pensacola Florida Naval Base by an ungrateful, wretched Saudi Arabian pig, who is being trained on how to be a better fighter pilot, is a direct stab in the heart; serving the people who welcomed him to benefit from their wealth of knowledge with such a poisonous dagger. If an officer of the Royal Saudi Arabian Air-force could carry out such terrorism inside America, killing three sailors and wounding so many others, it shows that terrorism runs very deep within the Saudi Arabian society. First, was the Khobar Tower bombing, then 9/11, when 19 Saudi Arabian citizen-terrorists hijacked planes in America and plowed them into several buildings, killing nearly 4000 people, both American citizens and other countries citizens. 

But instead of holding them accountable, the then government of President George W. Bush quietly flew hundreds of Saudi Arabian citizens living in America, particularly in Massachusetts, including immediate relatives of Osama Bin Laden, safely back to Riyadh. Till date, no one within the Saudi Arabia ruling Royal family has been called out or held to account for the murders of 9/11. The psychological damage of that infamy still lives with American people and now, another attack has been carried out on American soil by yet another citizen-terrorist from the same Saudi Arabia. 

ICHEOKU maintains that these Saudi Arabia citizens terrorists are emboldened by the fact that America seem to have mortgaged itself, interest and conscience to the dictates of the Saudi Arabian ruling Royal family; that America's arms are tied and that America cannot do anything to them. These brazen repeated attacks by these Saudi Arabian citizen-terrorists that kill American people, without any retribution from America, seem to give some credence and validity to this warped thinking. ICHEOKU says since America is now energy sufficient and no longer dependent on Saudi Arabian oil, what else is the Saudi Arabian blackmail that hamstrings America and prevents it from retaliating for these Saudi Arabian citizen-terrorism. How many more American lives would these Saudi Arabian citizen-terrorists need to take, before America says enough is enough to the rulers of Saudi Arabia. 

ICHEOKU says King Salman bin Abdulaziz al Saud's apology is not a good enough; neither is it a sincere contrition and therefore not acceptable and should be rejected forthwith. His thumb print is on every terrorism being spread around the world by his Saudi Arabian citizen-terrorists, particularly those which are killing American citizens. The King put in place the conditions and establishments which are minting these terrorists, through brainwashing and indoctrination of their young impressionable people, from kindergarten through the highest citadels of learning in Saudi Arabia. He created the enabling environment which nurtures these terrorists and allowed them to thrive. 

Thousands of terrorists' proven grounds exist in Saudi Arabia in the form of Madrassa schools, which the King allowed to operate freely and without check in Saudi Arabia. The King also tolerates the most extreme form of Islam in his Kingdom called Wahhabism; and spends millions of their petrol dollars in spreading it around to other countries  throughout the world. These make him complicit in Saudi Arabian terrorism for which he needs to take some responsibility; failing which America needs to hold him accountable.

So, how can the King say that he is sorry for the terrorist who struck in Pensacola when he breeds terrorists in his Kingdom like the rats, which they are. Has the King ever taken steps to closely monitor what type of hateful teachings against America which those Saudi Arabian mullahs and Imams are impacting on their students inside the Madrassa schools? Has the King ever taken steps to modernize and allow some fundamental liberties to the people of Saudi Arabia, so that they can find some other pleasures of life to engage in, outside being frustrated with lack of freedom; and thus ending up in those brainwashing Madrassas schools to be indoctrinated about dying for Allah and going to meet their 70 virgins in paradise. 

What manner of idiotic teaching and belief is that, that a person would elect to die, prosecuting his Allah's bidding and will be rewarded with intact women in their paradise. In this 21st century, that such pathetic belief is still prevalent in Saudi Arabia says it all, about a King who is just milking an ignorant society, kept servile and held hostage to his whims and caprices. The King, instead of modernizing and dismantling these fertile grounds that breed terrorists, is busy playing diplomatic niceties and saying that he is sorry that more American lives were taken by his country's citizen-terrorist. 

ICHEOKU says what is the King sorry for? What is King Salman bin Abdulaziz al Said really sorry for? That he created the enabling environment which bred the terrorist or that the terrorist struck inside America, killing three American soldiers on their Naval base? ICHEOKU is emphatic that until those scarf-wearing guys in Riyadh are dealt with or the riot act seriously read to them, they will continue the bloodsucking of American people. The other time it was journalist Khassoggy that they murdered and dismembered inside their embassy in Istanbul; the other time it was Khobar Tower; then 9/11 happened and now this Pensacola Florida Naval base killings. Then you ask yourself, when will enough really become enough, such that American government will stop cuddling the terroristic royal family in Riyadh. American people demand justice and they want it now.

'CORY BOOKER IS WELL SPOKEN': A RACIST INSULT TO BLACK PEOPLE.

ICHEOKU says it is deja vu Joe Biden's racist remark that Barack Obama is the first well spoken, articulate and clean black man he ever met. Now it is Michael Bloomberg's turn to disparage another black man as "very well spoken" and by extension insulting all peoples of color. What an arrogant, very condescending Jewish dwarf and he doesn't even speak well in the real sense of it; but here he is, evaluating an overachieving black man on how well he speaks. An insult to Cory Booker is an insult to every black man and woman of America and no apologies will be either enough or acceptable, period. Michael Bloomberg's statement was intended and calculated to register a message that Cory Booker is not a bona fide American.

Cory Booker is a privileged black guy who went to the best schools in America and Britain. He is well schooled and tutored in every sense of the word highly educated. He speaks English as his first language and masterfully well. So, the attempt by Michael Bloomberg to denigrate him by calling him a "nigger" by necessary implication, is rather an unforgiving sin of a racist Jewish midget. Black American people will not forget it and will remember it for Michael Bloomberg when the time comes. 

How dare Michael Bloomberg say of a man, who went to highly rated private schools, including Stanford University, Yale University and Oxford University; a lawyer, a two terms Mayor, Senator and a presidential candidate aspirant, that he speaks well. What exactly does Michael Bloomberg mean by that other than to imply that Cory Booker is a "Nigger" and not necessarily an acceptable presidential material. ICHEOKU says if Cory Booker does not speak well, who else speaks well in America. Michael Bloomberg is a billionaire, but that does not give him the carte-blanc right to insult a fellow presidential candidate aspirant, who by all standards measured, is a very successful black man in America and a very fluent and eloquent speaker of English language. 

Why did Michael Bloomberg not say that Pete Buttgieg speaks well, as every person who have ever cared to listen to Mayor Pete speak, affirms that he is masterful with the English words. Why did Michael Bloomberg not say that about Joe Biden or Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren or Tulsi Gabbard? But, he purposely singled out a black man to telegraph to Americans that he is not the right fit for the White House. This is a recurring decimal in America, where some white people, including this Jewish Michael Bloomberg, always scornfully, very dismissive of black people as not good enough. 

Often times you will hear them say such things as "You speak English well" or "Where did you you learn to speak English" or "I like your accent" to foreign born black Americans. Many of these horrible human beings themselves do not understand any other language than the English in which they are born into; yet they are the first to question an English second language speaker on speaking prowess. Even foreign born white people are not spared of their bile; such that some useless boneheads sometimes make jest of the way in which America's First Lady Melanie Trump speaks English, forgetting that English is not her first language and that she speaks five other languages in addition. Yet they, in their self importance, arrogantly mocks her phonetics. 

Anyway, Michael Bloomberg has sealed shut whatever window that was hitherto left open for him with some black votes, in his tall dream of ever winning the Democratic Party's presidential nomination, talkless of the White House.  And in the unlikely event the party sells the ticket to him, he must understand that there is no way through hell any Democrat could ever win the White House without black Americans' feverish support. This fella does not seem to weigh his words first before uttering them and he was caught on video disparaging poor people as not deserving help because their having money will lead to their deaths. Meanwhile, he has money but he has not died; but in his warped thinking, poor people are different. 

When the existing relationship between Jewish Americans and black Americans is not very cordial, now comes this additional insult on a black presidential candidate aspirant. Every black person in America can relate to what Michael Bloomberg said, having experienced such insult in some form themselves, where sometimes they even question if indeed you honestly earned your academic credentials. ICHEOKU says any black person who votes for this Michael Bloomberg is a sellout, who has no core, character or conviction to do what is right by declaring no more tolerating of such cockiness from these arrogant people. Michael Bloomberg is toast and this now seals whatever faith he may previously have within the black voting community. What a jerk and he is unelectable and cannot be elected. As for his apology, he can stuff it in his you know where, his rear orifice. Done and dusted.

JONATHAN TURLEY: HIS FINEST HOUR

"One can oppose President Trump’s policies or actions but still conclude that the current legal case for impeachment is not just woefully inadequate, but in some respects, dangerous, as the basis for the impeachment of an American president. My personal and political views of President Trump, however, are irrelevant to my impeachment testimony, as they should be to your impeachment vote. My only concern is the integrity and coherence of the constitutional standard and process of impeachment. 

President Trump will not be our last president and what we leave in the wake of this scandal will shape our democracy for generations to come. I am concerned about lowering impeachment standards to fit a paucity of evidence and an abundance of anger. If the House proceeds solely on the Ukrainian allegations, this impeachment would stand out among modern impeachments as the shortest proceeding, with the thinnest evidentiary record, and the narrowest grounds ever used to impeach a president. That does not bode well for future presidents who are working in a country often sharply and, at times, bitterly divided. 

There is no higher constitutional structure than the impeachment of a sitting president and, for that reason, an impeachment must have a wide foundation in order to be successful. The Ukraine controversy has not offered such a foundation and would easily collapse in a Senate trial. It is easy to fall in love with lines that appeal to one’s moral approval. In impeachments, one’s feeling about the subject can distort one’s judgment on the true meaning or quality of an argument. We have too many happy warriors in this impeachment on both sides. What we need are more objective noncombatants, members willing to set aside political passion in favor of constitutional circumspection. 

If we are to impeach a president for only the third time in our history, we will need to rise above this age of rage and genuinely engage in a civil and substantive discussion. Impeachment was never intended to be used as a mid-term corrective option for a divisive or unpopular leader. To impeach a president on such a record would be to expose every future president to the same type of inchoate impeachment. 

Both sides in this controversy have demonized the other to justify any measure in defense. We have forgotten the common article of faith that binds each of us to each other in our Constitution. However, before we cut down the trees so carefully planted by the Framers of the constitution, I hope you consider what you will do when the wind blows again . . . perhaps for a Democratic president. Where will you stand then? I get it. You are mad. The President is mad. My Democratic friends are mad. My Republican friends are mad. My wife is mad. My kids are mad. Even my dog is mad . . . and Luna is a golden doodle and they are never mad. We are all mad and where has it taken us? Will a slipshod impeachment make us less mad or will it only give an invitation for the madness to follow in every future administration? 

That is why this is wrong. It is not wrong because President Trump is right. It is not wrong because the House has no legitimate reason to investigate the Ukrainian controversy. It is not wrong because we are in an election year, but this process concerns the constitutional right to hold office in this term, not the next. No, it is wrong because this is not how an American president should be impeached." - Jonathan Turley. 

ICHEOKU says excerpts from his testimony before the House Judiciary Committee on impeachment hearing. He is one cool, calm and calculated customer and he showed that he truly earned his academic credentials and it showed. Probably the only grown up among the four witnesses who testified with no scintilla of bias; just his fair opinion. ICHEOKU says was intrigued and happily delightful with his matured and carefully chosen words in pursuit of a united peoples of America.

PAMELA KARLAN: A SEXLESS AND LOVELESS CUR.

ICHEOKU says just by listening to her high pitched voice and watching the manner of her body language and you will know someone who is not truly happy with herself. She is ugly; she is petite; she is short; she is bitchy and she is cantankerous; the reason men don't look at her twice. She is mad at men and desperately seeking vengeance. She ended up becoming a lesbian and an acute bisexual feminist activist. Simply put, she is a good illustration of a woman scorned whose fury makes hell look comfortable. 

Pamela Karlan propped herself before the American people to spew rubbish, theorizing on matters which is both laughable, ridiculous and unsupported by reason, logic and legal  dispositions. Just another feminist political hack like Dr Christine Blassey Ford and Marie Yovanovitch, who came for a role play before the Judiciary Committee on impeachment; part of the flock of angry birds wing of the Democratic Party. She testified as she was retained to do and refused to accord the president the same contextual space which she demanded of the statement which she made before the committee. It was personal for him and she came there to register it. A matter made worse when she dragged the name of the president's minor child's name, Baron, into a purely partisan persecution of the president. 

Alongside her co-persecutors and traducers of the president, she chose to just pick a sliver of what the president said in the telephone call to Ukraine, "do us a favor"; without including the context of "our country went through a lot." She is cold and has no warmth about her; and her heartbeat is probably near non existent. ICHEOKU says will not spend valuable time harping on such an unhappy fellow; but suffice it to say that were ICHEOKU taking any course taught by her, would switch it out in order to put a distance from her and stop seeing her. She is a mad professor who is very vengeful and will purposely fail a student for expressing a different point of view. What a show of shame which she put up before the Judiciary Committee impeachment hearing. 

How such a person goes to sleep each night is simply beyond ICHEOKU and you ask yourself what would make a human to become so angry and so vicious. So what if she donated money to Queen Crooked Hillary Clinton campaign, with a promise to be nominated to the Supreme Court and she lost, thus crushing her dreams. Speaking of a quid pro quo and you begin to understand the root cause of her anger against the president. She is mad at him for sabotaging her Supreme Court dream and she did not spare anyone of her disdain for the president. 

Pamela Karlan is such a vile person and she is as ugly as sin; just look at her face and those two large ear lobes. Simply, nightmarish looking. She is a pitiful and sadistic angry mean girl, the type you will never allow your friends to see you with nor ever think about taking home to meet your parents. She is a disgrace to law degree and law professorship; but she is in a Californian just like Adam Schiff and Nancy Pelosi. 

JOE BIDEN: TIME FOR INTERVENTION HAS COME, ENOUGH OF THE SPECTACLE.

ICHEOKU says anyone who has or ever had an old father or uncle, knows that a time comes when you have to intervene in their life and confine them inside the house or senior center and away from public view. They are not public spectacle and should not be seen for entertainment or ridiculing purposes. It is called age of senior moments and old Uncle Joe Biden has certainly now attained that status. His mind has gone fishing as a result of advanced old age and other possible mental conditions, including likely mental incapacitation. 

Watching him now labor under the weight of old age on the campaign trail begs the question, what is his family waiting for before they stop the public embarrassment of their family, by power hungry mob who are eager to use him to recover their supposed lost power. As they should know, it is not an oblivious Joe Biden that is embarrassed; it is them, whose family he belongs. As they say in some cultures, it is not the blind person who mistook a bowl of hand washing water for soup and dipped his food inside it, that is usually ashamed; it is the relatives who did not position the bowl of soup well enough for him not to miss it. Why would Joe Biden's family allow the spectacle he has become to continue to go through the torture he is facing on the campaign trail? Is it worth it? Why sacrifice him for other people's aggrandizement?

What is wrong with humans that they would go to any length, including this length, take hostage of an old and tired man, force him to make a caricature of himself, just because they want to get their power back. The latest "I have hairy legs; I like kids rubbing my leg up and down, pulling on my blonde hair; I like kids sitting on my lap" is simply incomprehensible and too much for anyone to bear. ICHEOKU is emphatic that anybody,  after watching this video, who is still looking for any other evidence of Joe Biden's mental depreciation, is indeed looking for something else; or does not even care at all that Joe Biden does not have a functional mind any longer. 

What is the worth of power afterall one would ask, that even his wife Dr Biden appear to be incohoot and would allow her husband to be so used, exposed and made mockery of, just for some people to wrestle power from the president through him. Enough of the sorry sight and if his family cannot do it, let the government agencies in charge of elder's abuse step in and tuck Joe Biden in for good. Let nursing aides do their job, making sure that he eats his food, takes his medicine, gets some stretching and walking exercises and that he doesn't wander away too far from the house in order to not get lost. The nibbling on his wife's finger and hairy leg comments did it for ICHEOKU that ICHEOKU has had it for good. Were Joe Biden related to ICHEOKU, ICHEOKU would have personally since ended his misery on the campaign trail, pronto. Barack Obama was probably right when he told his former VeePee not to do it; but other forces hijacked Joe Biden and forced him into it. Enough of the public humiliation. #SaveAndFreeJoeBiden.

TRUMP IS RIGHT: BOYCOTT THE IMPEACHMENT

ICHEOKU says the president is right in his decision not to participate in the sham impeachment hearing being perpetrated on the American people by the Democrats. The Democrats denied him participation at the onset and suddenly now wants to yield him some level of participation and you wonder why, what changed? 

There is a great erosion of interest by the American people with the impeachment and the Democrats figured that the only way to give some life-saving shot back to the impeachment drama is with the president's participation, hence their decision to extend an invitation to the president. The president, by participating in it, will accord it some level of credibility as a rational and reasonable exercise; but boycotted, will loudly reverberate the message that it a sham. 

The president's intuition is once again apposite and his decision not to participate in such a kangaroo inquisition is the right call. Let the Democrats continue with their inquisition and their never ending presidential harassment, as the American people have seen it for what it is, a set of angry Democrats, hounding and antagonizing the president for no other cogent reason other than his winning the presidential election 2016. 

ICHEOKU says the Republican Party should consider joining the president in his boycott of the proceedings and let their members of Congress stay out the proceeding. This has been ICHEOKU's clearly stated position since day one when Adam Schiff denied the president fair hearing, no participation, no witnesses and no cross examination; so why suddenly now, what changed? Something is not right here and smells fishy indeed. 

Since the Democrats wants to monopolize every aspect of adjudicating the process, the judge, the prosecutor and the jury, let them have a go at it and make their case to the American people. But the Republicans must not be a part of the scam or by their participation give a veneer of credibility to the impeachment scandal. The time to say no more is now; enough of the gimmickry. Stand with the president. 

USMAN KHAN: DESERVEDLY KILLED BY THE POLICE.

ICHEOKU says London Bridge terrorist who used knife to stab and kill two people and wounded three others, was a malignant tumor within the British society and should never have been let out of custodial detention, following his previous conviction for terrorist activities. 

Those people do not change, as what they believe is a far greater cause for them than whatever rehabilitation the British Justice system had them going through, including an early release. Had it been that he served all his sentenced time, he would still be in prison and not have the time and opportunity to perpetrate another terrorist crime in which two people lost their lives, as well as several others who suffered knife wound injuries. 

But a political correctness immersed City of London and their liberal Judge, who is legislating from the bench, decided to grant him an early release. Today, the terrorist has scoffed at them and paid the people who showed him mercy with a coin of scorn, telling them how stupid and gullible they are, to allow themselves to be beguiled that a leopard was capable of changing its spots. ICHEOKU says if he had not been released from prison so early and was rather confined to a much longer sentence, he would have been too old to terrorize anybody when he is eventually released at age 90. 

But it is London, where too much liberalism has eroded society's values and so much, that Islamic ideology and thinking has for all intent and purpose taken a deep root in the City. It is pitiful and regrettable that what Winston Churchill sacrificed so much to bequeath Londoners have been fretted away so quickly by needless and unnecessary pandering. If the British people were looking for a people or ideological or religious thought to colonize  their way of life, why then did they fight and surrender to the Germans. 

Why would so many people sacrifice their lives to keep Britain, British; only for the current generation of woos to throw everything away such that Britain has lost its identity and increasingly looks more like Karachi than a citadel of Western civilization. It has gotten so bad that even London has a Pakistani Muslim as its Mayor and you wonder when a Muslim will also take over 10 Downing Street, completing the Islamic overrun of Britain. 

Anyway, back to the Muslim terrorist who killed two and wounded three others on London bridge yesterday, ICHEOKU says it was an otherwise preventable terror, admitted the gun totting marksmen did a good job ending the terrorist's misery by neutralizing him on the spot. 

Muslim terrorist Usman Khan is another statement to the fact that some people don't necessarily change; they are impervious to correction and incapable of evolving, regardless of the help rendered. He was earlier convicted for terrorism and sent to prison, but was released early; but instead of being grateful and walking the thin straight line to a well fulfilled life outside terrorism, he went straight back to it. He was beyond redemption and could not be rehabilitated into a good citizen, who can meaningfully contribute to society. What a coincidence that he shared the same last name with the petite London Mayor, Sadiq Khan. 

Anyway, he has been dispatched to go meet with his 70 virgins and hopefully he finds out soon that his mind was messed up by a messed up teaching, where the instructors are not in a hurry to go get their own 70 virgins, but steadily ask others to hurry up and go get theirs by committing terrorist acts. 

ICHEOKU says kudos to the rifle totting police sharp shooter, who did not waste time or thought twice before pulling the trigger. He did not care about the corrupt crooked media and associated liberals accusing him of murder and labelling him with so many other unprintable names because of what he did. He decide on to put an end to the public safety hazard and save the public from continuing harm by serving the terrorist with the same summary dispatch which the terrorist served his victims. 

The police man was tired of political correctness judges, who rules without thinking about the society's greater good; who could once again rule to keep and observe the terrorist in prison, at tax payers expense and to be released at a future date. The policeman has had enough of such judges and decided to have a final say on the fate of the recidivist terrorist. That is the way to go and hopefully the British police will soon kill enough of those terrorists to put fear into them and to finally dis-incentivize them from their terrorist activities. Way to go, London police!

TRUMP WILL BE REELECTED IN 2020 - BET FOUNDER ROBERT JOHNSON.

ICHEOKU says except for those in denial, who because of their own mental, psychological and psychiatric health and well being, has refused to give credit to he who it is due, every good and fair minded person on this planet earth, particularly those who call America home, knows that President Donald John Trump will be resoundingly reelected to a second term on November 3rd, 2020. 

ICHEOKU says the president will convincingly win  his reelection with over 70 million votes and no Jupiter can stop what is ordained by the Heavens. He is the now Messiah, sent by the Almighty God to fix what is broken in America and the Western civilization. He was elected to the presidency of America by Divine intervention to help reposition America as well as the greater world; and he is doing a heck of a good job going about his assigned task. Therefore, no man or woman born of woman, including all the Democratic Party candidates who are vying for the nomination of the party plus Michael Bloomberg, can do a thing to derail or stop the assured reelection of the president. 

So, ICHEOKU says is happy to read and hear what the founder of Black Entertainment Television (BET), Robert Johnson, said about the president literally running away with the presidency in 2020. Mr Johnson is right and he read the political trajectory of the country very well; admitted many of his Democratic colleagues are in denial, despite the facts starring them on the face about the president's uncontroverted clear chance of a reelection; especially with the outpouring of support, massive donations and huge attendances recorded at his various MAGA/KAG rallies. Mr Johnson rightly pointed at the skewed polls meant to discourage and portray what is not, otherwise why are those being polled as supporting other candidates not showing up at their candidates' rallies, one would ask? But Americans know the game which the Democrats and their media acolytes play, deceit and fakery which are meant to wow; but their effort shall be in vain as it was in 2016. 

Mr Robert Johnson gave the president an "A+" in the manner he is handling the economy, which has resulted in unprecedented economic growth, job hiring, wage increases and new business ventures springing up, which has resulted in the lowest unemployment figures recorded in the history of the United States of America. So, why would any right thinking person vote against his or her interest, to lose his or her job, by voting for the job killers who are on the other side. It will not happen, period. According to Johnson, when you look at all the indicators of a healthy economy, such as consumer confidence, job growth, unemployment especially for African Americans and women, wage rise, stock market and other variables, they are all doing well, which shows that the economy is really doing well, thanks to President Donald John Trump economic policies. So, which voter will risk all these good things, including the added risk of losing their jobs, by voting for the other guy or gal. 

ICHEOKU says Mr Johnson also said that he admires the president's disruptive activities into what would otherwise be called expected political norms, including the way he conducts America's foreign policy; how he takes on government agencies and deals with immigration. In short, Mr Johnson said that he is a fan of the president's draining of the Washington Swamp and that he loves that the president brought his own management style into governance. It was also his position that he will not allow himself to become a victim of the zero-sum game which the Democratic Party plays, where everything Trump is automatically considered bad; maintaining that he will not be caught up in anything Trump is for, to be against it. He said that he will always speak his mind, in an independent way and based on the facts as they present themselves and not be constricted and confined to prepared talking points by Democratic research experts. 

Continuing, the BET founder said that the Democratic candidates have gone too far left and near the deep end, bordering on lunatic fantasy, such that they have alienated a lot of American voters including African Americans, who strongly disagree with certain positions which the candidates have embraced, championing and propagating. Mr Johnson said, being a life-long Democrat that he does not see anybody in the Democratic Party's presidential primaries that is close enough to the center where majority of American voters, including African Americans are. He said that as a result, African Americans might decide to sit the election out and will not be motivated to turn out to support and vote for whoever the Democratic candidate eventually becomes in 2020. Reechoing Michael Bloomberg, although Mr Johnson may have included Michael Bloomberg in his assessment, the mogul concluded that no person in the group of the Democratic Party's presidential wanna bees is capable of beating President Donald John Trump in 2020, despite what the polls say and want American people to otherwise believe. 

ICHEOKU says Robert Johnson spoke the truth and bravely so too, admitted black Americans have not forgiven him for endorsing Queen Crooked Hillary Clinton over black Barack Obama in 2016, when he said that Obama was peddling drugs on the streets of Chicago and now wants to be president. Anyway, truth sometimes can come from unexpected sources and in the matter of Trump's reelection chances in 2020, Mr Johnson succinctly captured the pulse of American people. They love their president and they love the unapologetic manner in which President Donald John Trump is holding aloft the glory of America, making American Great Again, projecting America's greatness and pursuing an all America First agenda. 

ICHEOKU says completely agrees with Robert Johnson and says thank God that another very significant black voice, in addition to Kanye West, has been added to the blacks for Trump's reelection 2020 movement. Hopefully, black Americans and other minorities of America will free themselves of the yoke of the Democratic Party that have seen them voting for the Democratic Party for over fifty years with nothing to show for it; and vote massively in 2020 to show their appreciation and also thank the president for creating jobs for black Americans, prison reforms that have freed thousands of black people from their long incarcerations, creating business districts in black communities as well as other things which he has overall accomplished during his first term. Way to go Mr B.E.T.

CYBERTRUCK: TESLA WILL FIX ITS MINOR GLASS CHALLENGE.

ICHEOKU says Elon Musk has done it several times over and has proved himself gazillion number of times that he is a man capable of trouble shooting problems and will certainly overcome the minor glass problem which its Cyber-truck suffered during exhibition launch. A promised bullet proof glass which shattered during launch exhibition, although an embarrassment, but it is a problem that can be solved and it will be solved. 

A man gifted and talented with innovation, who sees every challenge as a new problem that requires a solution, will go to the ends of the earth to solve any implicated problem which affects his company and products. He will also solve the problem of the shattered glass of his Cybertruck, admitted the incident did not breach nor compromise the person inside the truck; and could be technically interpreted as having functioned as designed. Bullet proof glass does not necessarily mean that the glass will not break or shatter, but that the fired projectile will not breach the glass to cause harm to or kill the occupant. 

Anyway, without sounding defensive or rather holding brief for Elon Musk and his Tesla group, ICHEOKU says the successful recoverable rockets by SpaceX, despite its initial setbacks, is an example that any identified problems is always solved by the Tesla people. So, without any further ado, the world should just see the shattered glass as a temporary kink in the Cyber-truck which shall and will be fixed. So, they should free free to continue placing their orders for the CyberTrucks, as it is one heck of a contraption on wheels that will smitten its competition. The future is here already. ICHEOKU says congratulations to Elon Musk and Tesla for yet again, coming up with a truck that is not really a truck, but a science fiction come alive. Simply so futuristic. 

MEN IN BLACK

 

ICHEOKU says they should come clean, spill the beans in order to have a peace of the mind.

JOE BIDEN AND SON HUNTER: A NEED TO INVESTIGATE THEM EXIST.

ICHEOKU says the world is bemused at America's idea of justice and fairness, on how asking that a criminal act be investigated became a crime and even more heinous than the crime itself. How can one party commit a crime and walk free; while the other party that asked for the crime to be investigated is being hounded and persecuted. How can anyone justify or reconcile him or herself to the never ending war against the president. 

Can any of those people who are participating in and cheering this modern day lynching of a duly elected president, put themselves in the victim-president's shoes and see of they take such abuse themselves? What the Democratic Party is doing through the impeachment proceeding is dent the president's approval ratings and also cover up what Joe Biden helped his son do in Ukraine. Instead of investigating the Bidens' for their Ukrainian crimes, the Democrats railroaded the president and are now taking steps to impeach him just because he asked for the Bidens' misdeeds to be  investigated. How any fair minded person would pervert justice in this manner is simply beyond comprehension. 

But thankfully, it is no longer just only Americans' issue. The world is keenly watching with interest and heightened curiosity to see how everything is eventually resolved. The illogicality of hounding President Donald John Trump for merely asking that Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden's activities in Ukraine be looked into, is so stupefying. How can the Bidens, who actually did the deed, not being investigated, while the president who merely asked for Ukraine to look into it, is being pummeled with impeachment inquiry. 

The controlling question/issue to resolve here is, had Joe Biden not been the Vice President and in charge of the Obama government effort to help Ukraine reform its image, penchant and notoriety for corruption, would his son Hunter Biden have been given such a high paying directorship in a very corrupt Ukrainian Burisma Gas Company? Why did Burisma wait until corruption in Ukraine became a focus of American government before appointing a director, the son of the same man who was in charge of America's anti corruption efforts in Ukraine, Vice President Joe Biden? Something does not look right here and even if what the Bidens did is not a crime, how about the appearance of it; its propriety? Donald Trump Jr was investigated for allegedly exploring business opportunities in Russia, but Hunter Biden, who actually did shady business ideals with Ukraine walks away free from any investigation. 

It does not pass the smell test and it is a big stain on America's image and moral standing in the world. It also amplifies the witch hunt accusation by the president that the Democrats are just out to get him; blinded by their hatred, envy and without regard to reason or rationality. A matter made worse by those television talking heads who are defending Joe Biden for doing "nothing wrong" in the matter. If the accusation against the Bidens was unsubstantiated, as claimed by CNN Anderson Cooper, when was the investigation that could not find the Biden's culpability, conducted? How could anyone ever say that a crime was not proved, when no effort was ever made to prove it? Hunter Biden admitted to it and his father Joe Biden also admitted to it on video, so why then is there no comprehensive investigation to get to the bottom of the matter. 

ICHEOKU says where is the moral or even legal justification or basis for this skewed impeachment inquiry against an innocent president. The Nancy Pelosi's led effort has now made America the butt of joke for the entire world, who are lost in the wilderness of the impeachment inquiry of President Donald John Trump over a thing as idiotic as this silliness. It is sad; it is laughable and it is ridiculously pitiful that the Congress is wasting their paid time on this, when there are a lot of work to do. Why is it ok for Joe Biden to help his son secure such an outlandish mouthwatering deal in Ukraine, but it is not ok for President Donald John Trump to ask for its investigation. America will NEVER be whole and wholesome again and the world will also NEVER again believe in America's moral standing until the Bidens' double dealings in Ukraine is thoroughly, completely, totally and fully investigated, period. 

MEGHAN MARKLE: THE AGONY OF AN UNWANTED PRINCESS.

In an interview granted to the BBC during their visit to Africa last summer, Meghan lamented that she was dying in silence inside the British royal family as an unwanted princess and that nobody ever cares to ask her how she was doing. In her own words, Meghan said, "I never thought it was going to be easy, but I thought it will be fair. Not many have asked me if I was ok. The good thing is that I got my baby and I got my husband, but I am not welcomed in England." 

With those words, a woman in agony finally broke her silence in a cry for help and announced to the world that she is living in bondage of royalty, unwanted, disliked and unwelcome. Put in another way, she said that she is tired of the facade and wants out. But will they just let her walk away in view of what happened to Lady Di; or will her husband Prince Harry be able to stick it out with her for as long as it takes for her to be accepted by the British people. Will Harry instead, take a cue from what happened to Fredo in The Godfather and understand that it is dangerous to take side with anyone against the family and return to his birth inheritance before it is too late. 

Although many would argue that Meghan is not just anyone but his wife, to which ICHEOKU counters that before Meghan, there was a family and she merely joined in. Blood is thicker than water and Meghan does not have royal blood coaxing through her veins. 

ICHEOKU says Meghan's interview was reminiscent of her mother in-law, the late Lady Diana's interview prelude to her divorce from husband Prince Charles and subsequent murder in Paris. Lady Di told the world of her anguish in the royal family, shedding light on the darkness that is the British royal family. She lamented being an unhappy woman in an unhappy marriage; and that her marriage was choked up, suffocated by a third party participant. Many people knew exactly who she was referring to as the third party, Mrs Parker Bowles, the lover of Prince Charles who he later married.  

While Lady Di's problem was marital infidelity of a lecherous husband who kept a mistress, Lady Meghan's problem appears to be a rejection and not being wanted in the palace nor accepted by the British people. It is therefore understandable that Prince Harry is worried  and expressed fear for his wife's safety and that Meghan might experience the same fatal, cruel fate which met his mother. ICHEOKU says his fear is palpable and it is not without reasonable basis, as Lady Di would still be alive today but for the conspiracy that eventually took her life. 

Meghan shares in the blame for not preventing or preparing for what she is now faced with. She entered into the boondoggle on her own volition, thinking that she can have her way and possibly change an institution which have lasted for thousands of years. But she rudely found out that the British monarchy is like a cult and demands total, absolute surrender and submission. Meghan was obsessively possessed with an opportunity at scoring a real life Prince but forgot that such usually comes with heavy burden, so she can cry ICHEOKU a river; tough luck.

She was so mesmerized by the allure of a real life Prince that the whirlwind romance got noticed by Prince Williams who warned his little brother Harry to slow it down and not to rush into something without first studying it carefully. But Prince Harry ignored the advise and took side with his newly found love against his only brother and proceeded to wed Meghan. It appears that Harry shared the counsel with his wife and her indignation at  William could be the genesis of the rift that eventually led to the falling out between the two formerly inseparable brothers. As is often the case, women hate family members of their husband who objected to their being married into their family. 

Meghan knew or should have known that she will not be welcome into the royal family. Harry also knew or should have known that his family will not and did not like his choice of a bride. A conflicted Harry however went rogue and decided to pitch his tent with Meghan against his family wishes. ICHEOKU says but is Meghan worth the trouble of Harry losing his family and peradventure, his royal inheritance. Unfolding events will soon reveal whether the decision Harry made was a wise one or a big fumble.

Meghan walked herself into the conundrum and should bear her present predicament with the equanimity of a gold digger, who finally got what she was looking for only to regrettably discover that all that glitters is not usually gold. She seems to have outsmarted herself in her quest to marry a prince and with it came the heavy load, which she now complains is too heavy for her fragile heart and slender shoulders to bear. What was she expecting will happen with all the baggage she brought with her into the royal family. Was she expecting a red carpet reception and not an inquest to find out how she bewitched Harry into wedding her. 

Now she understands how painful rejection is and exactly how her father felt being rejected by her. She shut him out from meeting his in-laws, uninvited him from her wedding and made him feel irrelevant, unwanted, useless, disposable and discarded. For Meghan, it seems that all that mattered to her was that she had captured a real life Prince. But karma is a bitch as she never knew that her tepid welcome in Britain had a very short expiration date. It did and she is now throwing her hands up in frustration in search of sympathetic ears and empathic mouths to ask her if she was ok? 

But she never asked her father if he was ok being shut out of his own daughter's wedding by his own daughter. She never gave a hoot about how her father felt, watching another man walk his own daughter down the aisle. She never cared how her father felt being denied the opportunity of a father and daughter first dance, making Mr Thomas Markle miss the eternal joy which came with it. Such a mean girl deserves no sympathy nor should she get one in her time of tribulation.

Meghan treated her father very poorly during her fairly tale crossover from a trailer park into royalty. Her current travail is possibly connected to it, evident that what goes around comes around. She should therefore deal with it in the same manner she expected her father to deal with the humiliation which she put him through during her wedding to Prince Harry. She wangled herself into the situation and now tangled, must find a way to untangle herself from the mess which she created. Nobody was consulted then by her before taking the plunge and nobody should be bothered now that she found out that she couldn't swim the tide. 

It necessarily followed that the royal family, like any other thinking family, wondered what manner of a woman would abandon her own family in a desperate bid to marry a Prince. How desperate could Meghan have been to allow another man, the father of her groom, to walk her down the aisle; when her own biological father was still alive and well, willing and able, ready and wanted to grace his daughter's wedding but was denied the opportunity. Thomas Markle had even fitted his tuxedo and was good to go but Meghan said no deal. 

Every well mannered girl dreams of the day her father would walk her down the aisle, but not Meghan. She lost the respect of every right thinking person from the way she treated her father and her apparent desperation in having another person's father walk her down the aisle. She was seen as a desperate woman who conned her way into the British royal family but she now feigns ignorance of why the Brits saw her as contrived, deceitful and manipulative and served her their cold dish of revenge.  

It is a fact that the closed off attitude of the British royal family did not help; begging the question why marry into it and if she must, why appear so desperate about it. How did she think the royal family and the British people would perceive or interpret her action, that she ensnared their prince and sacrificed her own father in the process. Why would Meghan ever think that Harry's people will be convinced that Prince Harry was not bewitched by her into marrying her. She is older than Harry; she is black; she is a foreigner; she was previously twice married and twice divorced; she is not virtuous for a prince, yet married a British Prince and in the manner she did it, but still delusional that she will be welcome and be a darling of the British people, really? 

There are certain things which are not amenable to sporadic change, such as thousands of years institution, especially not because a fully liberated American feminist gold digger said so or desired it. Meghan went about marrying Prince Harry the wrong way and in a manner that reeked of desperation. She lost the respect and regard of the royal family as well as many other discerning people by the way she treated her father and allowed another man to walk her down the aisle and also have the first dance with her, two honors reserved for any daughter's father, regardless.

Her action depicted her as an ill mannered lady, who was cruel to her father all in a desperate bid to get into a social status and circle where she does not belong. She was a  peasant without any pedigree whatsoever, who desperately sought a life of royalty. From how everything started, it became a question of if, but not when the sand castle she created will wash away with the tide of time. The current developments confirm that the Royal family have had enough of Meghan and are now ready to dump her; and if it means together with Harry, so be it. 

Her injury was self inflicted. She did not understand hierarchy. Instead of taking her place on the queue behind the future Queen of England and wife of William Kate Middleton, to understudy royal etiquette, mannerisms and courtesies, understanding that she is not and will never be the future queen of England and that Kate is her boss, she acted as if she should be the object of all attention and affection. She was rude to her palace assigned personal staff. She desperately wanted to displace Kate before the Queen with her affectations and came off as crude, rude, ill mannered, ill prepared and heavily deficient in royal mannerisms. 

The British monarchy is an enduring institution which have lasted for thousands of years, principally because there are rules of engagement governing its membership. The institution and its rules are strange to Meghan, the reason she brought on herself her current sadness, married into a royal family that did not want nor welcome her. Were ICHEOKU to advise Meghan, will recommend that she cut her losses and get the hell out of there before a suicide-triggering, manic depression sets in. She should get a divorce immediately as things will not get any better because certain things do not change. Alternatively, she should persuade Harry to renounce his prince-hood so that they can become commoners, not hemmed in by royal etiquettes. Thereafter, they can move on with their lives, weaned off the tentacles of the monarchy. But any other thing, including her current cry for help, will not a thing change. 

Meghan does not qualify to be a British princess, her general background considered. She also broke a palace rule by engaging in politics when she attacked President Donald John Trump, which forced the punch back harder president to Twitter-lash her as a nasty woman. She became known as a Princess Nasty Woman of the British royal family, a blemish which was a hard swallow for the Queen who became caught in a spat between the wife of her grandson and a president who she has a soft spot for.

So the crux of the matter was not necessarily that Prince Harry married a black woman, admitted the Brits would rather he had married an unblemished British white blonde from a British upper class family. The Brits are not mad because Harry married a foreigner but that he married a trailer-trash, uncouth divorcee, a desperado, who shamelessly begged another man to walk her down the aisle and give her away in marriage. Who does that and still expects the respect of the family she is married into or the wider British people. Most decent women would rather the wedding did not take place than bar her family members, particularly any of her parents, from attending, no matter the oddity of her family. 

People who have been paying attention to the odd couple that this day will come and that the unwanted Princess would soon outlive her tepid welcome. Her clock started ticking when she humiliated her father out from attending her wedding, which The manner in which Meghan humiliatingly treated her father during her wedding was the beginning of her unhappiness in Britain. People took note of it. Our Lord said to honor your father and mother that your days of happiness may be long; but unfortunately, Meghan did not heed Exodus 20:12 hence the shortness of her happiness in Britain. She is now frantically telling her sad tale as an unwanted gatecrasher into the British royal family in a desperate bid to  attract sympathy.  

ICHEOKU says as a general rule of the thumb, whenever a person speaks about their love life as "complicated", it is either non existent or is far from being the great fairy tale of bliss which they had expected going into the relationship. Meghan Markle is now feeling the blues and desperately seeking empathy, but she must first apologize to her father and ask for his forgiveness. What she did to her father was indeed heartless and despicable, that many people ares still incensed at her and she cannot get what she wants without first making amends.

Further, her misery was self inflicted as she does not belong in the royal Manor to begin with. She does not have the right pedigree nor was she tutored well to prepare her for such a high profile position that sometimes demands great stoicism. She is not a lady in the proper use of that term. She is an untamed, wild eyed, crazed out Hollywood feminist, who is not versed in royal etiquettes and does not know how to role play in a monarchy set up. She sees herself as a liberated feminist but forgot that such idiocy has no place in a traditional setting like a monarchy. 

It is unfortunate what is happening to Meghan but she brought it upon herself because of her obsession of royalty. She was so possessed with marrying a real life prince that even when her friends warned her not to do it, she ignored them and distanced herself from them. Now, realty has set in and it is all regrets. But unbeknownst to her, certain things do not change and the rules governing the British monarchy will not change just because Meghan Markle wished so. Her only choice, if it could still qualify as choice, is to either submit or be kicked out or as it now seems, simply walk away; ending her fairly tale adventure in Monarchy land. 

But the British monarchy is greater and bigger than Meghan Markle and have lasted for thousands of years before she crashed into it. It will continue to endure, with or without Meghan. It also will not bend over or break or succumb to Meghan. Prince Harry is fully aware of the preeminence of the monarchy but caused the rift anyway, when he veered off his destined path and married a woman with so much baggage. He must therefore make up his mind to either to go all out with Meghan by renouncing his royalty or cut his losses now by walking away from her and returning back to his inheritance just like the biblical prodigal son. 

Birds of the same plumage usually flock together, but there is nothing Harry has nor shares in common with Meghan, except single humanity and ICHEOKU says refuses to accept that it was a case of love conquers all. Rather it is a tragedy of a palace wrecker, who has put a wedge between formerly two inseparable brothers, two princes, who were joined at the hip by the tragedy of their mother's loss. What Diana put together, Meghan has pulled apart and put sunder. Now she wants to tear the palace down and bring the British Monarchy down as well. There are home wreckers and home breakers, but with Meghan, she is threatening to take the British Monarchy down. 

It depends on whether the Queen will act peremptorily to cut off Harry from his inheritance and thus deny Meghan the joy of taking down the British Monarchy; because she will if the opportunity ever avails her. But it appears the palace will readily sacrifice Harry if it forced to make the ultimate decision between choosing either him or the monarchy and the world is seeing its tell tale signs and flashing lights that the tense situation will soon come to a head. What a rebellious prince. 

BREAD AND BUTTER: GRANTED FULL PARDON.

ICHEOKU says following tradition, President Donald John Trump granted full pardons to two turkeys meant for the presidential thanksgiving dinner table on Thursday 28th November 2019 Thanksgiving Day celebration. Two turkeys, named Bread and Butter, were spared the butcher's knife and will now live out their natural lives in a farm somewhere; only old age will do them in and no longer the human stomach. 

It would appear that the two birds before knowing their fate, were asking each other, "YOU or ME", who is it gonna be? But both birds got lucky, courtesy of a humane President Donald John Trump, who decided to spare their lives and granted them full pardon and immunity from both the butcher's knife and cooking utensils.  ICHEOKU says happy turkey day America, admitted Bread and Butter won't be on the dinner menu. 

NYOUNG YOU: SET HER FREE.

ICHEOKU says when are people going to start taking responsibility for their actions and not needlessly blaming others or someone else for making them do something. Unlike the Plainville teenager Michelle Carter who was convicted for "encouraging" her boyfriend Conrad Roy to kill himself, Nyoung You did not encourage nor force Alexander Urtula to jump off to his death. 

Here was a 22 year fully grown adult man, old enough to be a father, who gave in to the monsters in his head whispering to him to do it, and now a young woman's life is facing ruination just because she once dated him. So, what if she told him to go die or kill himself, commonly used fighting words, which people readily use each time they quarrel or have a fight with each other. A rather emotionally and psychologically disturbed individual, who couldn't stand losing his girlfriend, decided to end his sad life and some people wants to blame the girl as responsible for that? 

ICHEOKU says it certainly does not make any sense at all, as she is not his emotional support animal. At only 21 years old, she cannot be said to be responsible for what a 22 year man, who is  older than her, decided to do by ending his life. Both of them were mad at each other following an impending breakup of their relationship and as everybody knows, breaking up is usually not a happy nor easy thing. The girl reserves the right to walk away from a relationship which she is either fed up with or is no longer fascinating to her. She walked and the guy jumped, so why blame her for exercising a right which she fully have, freedom of association. 

Unless somebody is saying that the girl owes the guy her affection and love in perpetuity and has no right or choice whatsoever in who she dates, then she has no case to answer because a fully grown man decided to give up and give in to his emotional demons and took his own life. She did not push him, encourage him nor goaded him on to make the jump off the building. All she did was curse him out because of her frustrations with the relationship which is no longer working as she had expected it. She ended it and she is now being held to account for it just because she used common fighting words in exchanged texts with him. Really? 

That such words would be a ground for her an indictment is simply befuddling. Were that the case, millions of people would have similarly taken their lives, having been severally told in their lives to go die or kill themselves. Even parents sometimes curse out their children that they will never amount to something and that they should just go and die. How many of such parents have ever been charged when their child acts on their devious impulses; but here a young woman is being charged for a crime which she did not commit.   Charging her with involuntary manslaughter is not fair nor right or justifiable. She only used mere words and short of any other active involvement in bringing about his death, such should not have been sufficient to ground culpability, regardless of the pervasiveness nature of her use of those words. 

How could she have “physically, verbally and psychologically" abused him so much that it now graduated to a criminality. The guy was not chained to her and he was a fully grown adult who could have exercised his right to walk away and end whatever abusive relationship he was in with her, but chose otherwise. She was not his mother nor his care giver; and they being not married, does not owe him a duty of care not to "abuse" him or not to use those words which  the guy might have considered too much to handle. Love hurts and sometimes love also kills, but baring any express direct act which resulted in the death of another, mere words should not be ground for liability. What about the girl's freedom of speech and she did not shout fire in a crowded theater either; she merely ended a failed relationship. The duty of a tortfeasor to take his victim as he finds him does not arise here since the girl does not even know that she was dealing with an emotionally depleted flagella of a human being. 

So what if both of them exchanged thousands of text messages, lovers do; and even none lover like Queen Crooked Hillary Clinton wrote 57,000 emails, 33,000 of which she deleted and bleached washed, yet she has not been held accountable for them. Ms You sent 47000 text messages to Mr Urtula and he in return sent her 28000 text messages. So what is the big deal that a girl was in a relationship which was going no where and tired of it, decided to end it; but the guy tried to win her back but failed and decided to take his own life. People break up every day and they curse each other out while doing that, so why is this particular case any different.  Her traducers selectively leaked some text messages where she told him to go die and kill himself; but how about those romantic and affectionate ones where she professed her love for him or her desire to end it but he was being insistent to the point of irritating her and pushing her buttons. Why are all the text messages not being leaked or released. 

ICHEOKU says regardless of her threats to harm herself or her manipulative skills which she used on the guy, at the end of the day, it was the guy who had the primary duty and responsibility over his actions, including his decision to jump off a building to his death. This fact of consequence should be the guiding light in this matter because not every person that was ever told to go die or kill yourself, acted on it; the insistence or constant persuasion notwithstanding. The girl also proved herself a good person by returning to the United States to face her charges as many others who are similarly exposed would have decided not to return. What happened to the two young fellas is rather unfortunate; but the surviving girl who is already over traumatized by the suicide of her boyfriend should not be further exposed to more trauma by holding her accountable for the one who jumped first. May the guy now rest and may the girl be set free so that she can carry on with her life.