COLIN KAEPERNICK SAT FOR MILLIONS OF BUTT-LESS AND INVISIBLE SITTERS.

Icheoku says instead of smacking him in the mouth for sitting, 49ers Quarterback Colin Kaepernick should be commended for using his celebrity status to once again redirect attention to a seething American problem that has seen hundreds of Americans, especially black Americans, needlessly murdered by the police. It takes a lion's courage and the dare of an eagle to so bravery to take on a whole nation, sitting down, while the national anthem is being played in a pre-football game. No one could have done it any better and boy did he succeed in bringing attention back to this scourge that is increasingly getting worse and in an American society that the world better knows as a "paradise" on earth; except that certain portions of the American society are still excluded and systematically annihilated therefrom.

It would seem that the American unspoken mantra of do no harm; don't disturb the groove; was violated by the action of Colin Kaepernick. A mantra which provides "see nothing and say nothing". if you want peace in the land and especially if you are a minority celebrity star or a person of stature. But move outside the drawn circle and you are branded and hated as evil and an ingrate and an enemy of the state; an anti American. They did it to OJ Simpson; they did it to Michael Jackson; they did it to Mike Tyson; they did it to Mohmammed Ali; they did it to Martin Lurther King; they did it to Rosa Park; they did it to Malcolm X; they did it to Black Panthers Party; they did it to the two 1968 Olympians Tommie Smith and John Carlos and they did it to so many other people who braved it to speak up against injustice and racism which is still pervasive within the American society. It is with the same fervor of shut it down and keep them silent that Black Lives Matter is being persecuted today. Their modus operandi is whatever rears its ugly head towards disturbing the code of silence, must be met with fierce shut down or cut the head off if a need be. 

Icheoku says it takes courage to stand up or as in this case to sit down for a cause one believes in; especially concerning the issue of race relations and police brutalization of black and other minorities of America. There are so many issues in America which need urgent straightening but which many Americans would rather they play a Hillary Clinton thereto, not being comfortable with the truth hence they either clam ignorance or flatly deny their existence. In a country that once supported apartheid; whose forebears were involved in slave trade and slavery; which still treats blacks and other minorities as sub par; which identifies every minority with their place of heritage and origin and summarily prefixes them with 'this and that' American, while accepting and treating only European whites as true Americans without any prefix; that is still very much segregated by neighborhoods, schools, churches and earning potentials etc cannot be said to be a wholesome country in the strict sense of that word. 

If there are African Americans; Asian Americas; Latin Americans, why shouldn't there be European Americans or even English Americans or German Americans or French Americans etc? Even original inhabitants of the land are prefixed and branded Indian Americans but European Americans, especially British and Germans, are not. So the question remains, why not use a one cap fits all treatment in this branding of every American? Alternatively, why not dissolve these boundaries and let everyone become and be seen and addressed as an American, without all the divisive compartmentalization that only succeed in putting wedges amongst the American people. 

Instead of working and fine-tuning these sore points of the society, the majority white Caucasians would rather they are swept under the carpet and not be disturbed by the stirring and swirling up of any dust. Icheoku bemoans that the wound of racism in America will remain a festering sore until it is properly properly attended to, dressed up and cured, and let the healing take place once and for all.  May be a good place to start is by ending the distinguishing and compartmentalization of Americans  into groups of 'this and that' American. There is African Americans; Latino Americans; Mexican Americans; Asia Americans; Chinese Americans; Jewish Americans; Italian Americans; Japanese Americans; Korean Americans and every manner of this and that American. But why then is it that there are no British or German or French Americans? 

Anyway many of those left on the sharp end of the spear understands what Colin Kaepernick did and are silently sitting with him as he sat in protestation of the continuing racism which affects literally everything in America; including a justice system and law enforcement that is greatly skewed against the colored and helpless of the society. If there is one American and an American is killed unjustly by any policeman, every American will see it that one of them was unlawfully killed and then collectively demand for justice. But hell no, it is just another black guy that was killed, so no big deal; forgetting that this black guy was someone's child and probably a father and husband too. This is the reason there is resentment among African Americans, the usual victims, who see the police as agent of the white oppressive majority and who are sent out to go hunt down black people. 

Like with every other men and women of conscience of the past, who refused to stay silenced and take it, Colin Kaepernick will similarly be made to pass through the grinding mill for daring to speak out. They will try to ruin him like they ruined every other person who ever dared to stand up for what is right or as in his case sit down for a justifiable cause. People burn flags in protestation; people have showed their disgust with the system in so many other ways, manners and forms, but Colin Kaepernick sat down and his sitting will cost him mightily. 

Icheoku is certain he properly advised himself of the consequences of his action before he took that seat as a butt of the butt-less. Hopefully he will whether the storm well, admitted that such protesters of the past, especially those two 1968 Olympians Tommie Smith and John Carlos  suffered mightily for raising that their power fist in Mexico City. But Colin's message was sent and was well received amongst the oppressed minorities of America. It also reverberated globally and once again called into question America's high moral grounds of still subjugating and treating a member of its society with such decrepitude. 

To Colin Kaepernick, Icheoku says know you that you have entered the pantheon of the greats of American minorities who stood up for what was just. Rosa Park, MLK, Mohammed Ali, Malcolm X etc will be smiling down from heaven, grateful that some men of courage are still abound among minorities of America. Thank you for sitting for the millions whose butt are invisible and be informed that you sat for Icheoku too. Icheoku says congratulations for a sitting well sat and know too that if Icheoku has a visible butt, Icheoku will sit longer and severally, more than the few minutes of a pre-game national anthem. Well done Kaepernick.

FEMINISTS TREATING MEN BADLY, BAD FOR FEMINISM - CATHY YOUNG.

Feminist male-bashing has come to sound like a cliche — a misogynist caricature. Feminism, its loudest proponents vow, is about fighting for equality. The man-hating label is either a smear or a misunderstanding. Yet a lot of feminist rhetoric today does cross the line from attacks on sexism into attacks on men, with a strong focus on personal behavior: the way they talk, the way they approach relationships, even the way they sit on public transit. 

Male faults are stated as sweeping condemnations; objecting to such generalizations is taken as a sign of complicity. Meanwhile, similar indictments of women would be considered grossly misogynistic. This gender antagonism does nothing to advance the unfinished business of equality. If anything, the fixation on men behaving badly is a distraction from more fundamental issues, such as changes in the workplace to promote work-life balance. What’s more, male-bashing not only sours many men — and quite a few women — on feminism. It often drives them into Internet subcultures where critiques of feminism mix with hostility toward women. 

To some extent, the challenge to men and male power has always been inherent in feminism, from the time the 1848 Seneca Falls Declaration of Sentiments catalogued the grievances of “woman” against “man.” However, these grievances were directed more at institutions than at individuals. In “The Feminine Mystique,” which sparked the great feminist revival of the 1960s, Betty Friedan saw men not as villains but as fellow victims burdened by societal pressures and by the expectations of their wives, who depended on them for both livelihood and identity. 

That began to change in the 1970s with the rise of radical feminism. This movement, with its slogan, “The personal is political,” brought a wave of female anger at men’s collective and individual transgressions. Authors like Andrea Dworkin and Marilyn French depicted ordinary men as patriarchy’s brutal foot soldiers. 

This tendency has reached a troubling new peak, as radical feminist theories that view modern Western civilization as a patriarchy have migrated from academic and activist fringes into mainstream conversation. One reason for this trend is social media, with its instant amplification of personal narratives and its addiction to outrage. We live in a time when jerky male attempts at cyber-flirting can be collected on a blog called Straight White Boys Texting (which carries a disclaimer that prejudice against white males is not racist or sexist, since it is not directed at the oppressed) and then deplored in an article titled “Dear Men: This Is Why Women Have Every Right To Be Disgusted With Us.” 

Whatever the reasons for the current cycle of misandry — yes, that’s a word, derided but also adopted for ironic useby many feminists — its existence is quite real. Consider, for example, the number of neologisms that use “man” as a derogatory prefix and that have entered everyday media language: “mansplaining,” “manspreading” and “manterrupting.” Are these primarily male behaviors that justify the gender-specific terms? Not necessarily: The study that is cited as evidence of excessive male interruption of women actually found that the most frequent interrupting is female-on-female (“femterrupting”?). 

Sitting with legs apart may be a guy thing, but there is plenty of visual documentation of women hogging extra space on public transit with purses, shopping bags and feet on seats. As for “mansplaining,” these days it seems to mean little more than a man making an argument a woman dislikes. Slate correspondent Dahlia Lithwick has admitted using the term to “dismiss anything said by men” in debates about Hillary Clinton. And the day after Clinton claimed the Democratic presidential nomination, political analyst David Axelrod was slammed as a “mansplainer” on Twitter for his observation that it’s a measure of our country’s “great progress” that “many younger women find the nomination of a woman unremarkable.” 

Men who gripe about their ex-girlfriends and advise other men to avoid relationships with women are generally relegated to the seedy underbelly of the Internet — various forums and websites in the “manosphere,” recently chronicled by Stephen Marche in the Guardian. Yet a leading voice of the new feminist generation, British writer Laurie Penny, can use her column in the New Statesman to decry ex-boyfriends who “turned mean or walked away” and to urge straight young women to stay single instead of “wasting years in succession on lacklustre, unappreciative, boring child-men.”  

Feminist commentary routinely puts the nastiest possible spin on male behavior and motives. Consider the backlash against the concept of the “friend zone,” or being relegated to “friends-only” status when seeking a romantic relationship — usually, though not exclusively, in reference to men being “friend zoned” by women. Since the term has a clear negative connotation, feminist critics say it reflects the assumption that a man is owed sex as a reward for treating a woman well. Yet it’s at least as likely that, as feminist writer Rachel Hills argued in a rare dissent in the Atlantic, the lament of the “friend zoned” is about “loneliness and romantic frustration,” not sexual entitlement. 

Things have gotten to a point where casual low-level male-bashing is a constant white noise in the hip progressive online media. Take a recent piece on Broadly, the women’s section of Vice, titled, “Men Are Creepy, New Study Confirms” — promoted with a Vice Facebook post that said: “Are you a man? You’re probably a creep.” The actual study found something very different: that both men and women overwhelmingly think someone described as “creepy” is more likely to be male. If a study had found that a negative trait was widely associated with women (or gays or Muslims), surely this would have been reported as deplorable stereotyping, not confirmation of reality. 

Meanwhile, men can get raked over the (virtual) coals for voicing even the mildest unpopular opinion on something feminism-related. Just recently, YouTube film reviewer James Rolfe, who goes by “Angry Video Game Nerd,” was roundly vilified as a misogynistic “man-baby” in social media and the online press after announcingthat he would not watch the female-led “Ghostbusters” remake because of what he felt was its failure to acknowledge the original franchise. 

This matters, and not just because it can make men less sympathetic to the problems women face. At a time when we constantly hear that womanpower is triumphant and “the end of men” — or at least of traditional manhood — is nigh, men face some real problems of their own. Women are now earning about 60 percent of college degrees; male college enrollment after high school has stalled at 61 percent since 1994, even as female enrollment has risen from 63 percent to 71 percent. Predominantly male blue-collar jobs are on the decline, and the rise of single motherhood has left many men disconnected from family life. The old model of marriage and fatherhood has been declared obsolete, but new ideals remain elusive. 

Perhaps mocking and berating men is not the way to show that the feminist revolution is about equality and that they have a stake in the new game. The message that feminism can help men, too — by placing equal value on their role as parents or by encouraging better mental health care and reducing male suicide — is undercut by gender warriors like Australian pundit Clementine Ford, whose “ironic misandry” often seems entirely non-ironic and who has angrily insisted that feminism stands only for women. Gibes about “male tears” — for instance, on a T-shirt sported by writer Jessica Valenti in a phototaunting her detractors — seem particularly unfortunate if feminists are serious about challenging the stereotype of the stoic, pain-suppressing male. Dismissing concerns about wrongful accusations of rape with a snarky “What about the menz” is not a great way to show that women’s liberation does not infringe on men’s civil rights. And telling men that their proper role in the movement for gender equality is to listen to women and patiently endure anti-male slams is not the best way to win support. 

Valenti and others argue that man-hating cannot do any real damage because men have the power and privilege. Few would deny the historical reality of male dominance. But today, when men can lose their jobs because of sexist missteps and be expelled from college over allegations of sexual misconduct, that’s a blinkered view, particularly since the war on male sins can often target individuals’ trivial transgressions. Take the media shaming of former “Harry Potter” podcaster Benjamin Schoen, pilloried for some mildly obnoxious tweets (and then an insufficiently gracious email apology) to a woman who had blocked him on Facebook after an attempt at flirting. While sexist verbal abuse toward women online is widely deplored, there is little sympathy for men who are attacked as misogynists, mocked as “man-babies” or “angry virgins,” or even smeared as sexual predators in Internet disputes. 

We are headed into an election with what is likely to be a nearly unprecedented gender gap among voters. To some extent, these numbers reflect policy differences. Yet it is not too far-fetched to see the pro-Donald Trump sentiment as fueled, at least in part, by a backlash against feminism. And while some of this backlash may be of the old-fashioned “put women in their place” variety, there is little doubt that for the younger generation, the perception of feminism as extremist and anti-male plays a role, too. 

This theme emerged in Conor Friedersdorf’s recent interview in the Atlantic with a Trump supporter, a college-educated, 22-year-old resident of San Francisco who considers himself a feminist and expects his career to take a back seat to that of his higher-earning fiancee — but who also complains about being “shamed” as a white man and voices concern about false accusations of rape. 

As this campaign shows, our fractured culture is badly in need of healing — from the gender wars as well as other divisions. To be a part of this healing, feminism must include men, not just as supportive allies but as partners, with an equal voice and equal humanity.

JESSE JACKSON BE MAN ENOUGH, ENDORSE TRUMP.

ICHEOKU says why Jesse Jackson is not leading the fight for the election of Donald Trump as president of the United States of America shows the thing wrong with politicians. A man who stood up for him and his rainbow Coalition as well as black Americans when it was not cool to do so, is a man deserving of reciprocity of love and affection with their support. Donald Trump stood up and helped black people foray into Wall Street, showing a propensity to do right for black Americans; hence his promised address of black American issues should be seriously considered and his offer accepted by black Americans and they in turn support his current quest for the presidency. Icheoku, after watching this video, says Jesse Jackson, in all consciousness should have no other choice but to damn whatever consequences and political upheaval it might cause, and man up and stand up for a man who stood up for him and black folks in the past.

Why Trump Will SMASH Hillary

DONALD TRUMP, MR CONSISTENCE.

D

Bernie Sanders: 'Super-Predators' was a Racist Term (Democratic Debate 1...

Icheoku says Crooked Hillary Clinton is a racist bimbo who does not care nor like black people. She sees them as votes only and discards them as soon as she is done with elections. She rejected Obama's preferred Gary Booker as veepee candidate in preference for her fellow white, a hillbilly from Virginia.

RYAN LOCHTE IS TO THE OLYMPICS WHAT HILLARY CLINTON IS TO POLITICS.

Icheoku says why then punish him for merely following in the footsteps of the Crooked One who is trying to occupy the highest office in the land? A woman who repeatedly lies and to the extent of lying to cover previous lies, is being protected while an olympic gold medalist, who misspoke or rather exaggerated as to the facts of what truly happened and have since apologized, is being hung, left to dry. 

Icheoku says where is the justiciability in singling out Ryan Lochte for not telling the truth about his encounter with some gun totting security officer in Brazil, while the Queen of lies, Madam untruth, from Bosnia to email-gate saga, is being cuddled and possibly nearing the presidency of America. Icheoku says is this a double standards that must not be allowed to continue as acceptable way of life in America where a Hillary Clinton is too big to face the same public scrutiny and reprimands as Ryan Lochte is being subjected to.

A lie is a lie and it should always remain the same reprehensible act, no matter who told it or what the lie is about. It should not matter it is Crooked Hillary Clinton or an olympic gold medalist swimmer Ryan Lochte, a lie should not be predicated on the teller. What example are we setting for our children when we preach and teach them that telling the truth is the key as they watch Hillary Clinton not face any consequences for all the lies she has told and repeated telling to cover up her previous continuing lies. Icheoku says if it is agreed that everybody is within the law, then either Ryan Lochte is not chastised or Hillary Clinton be made to face consequences for all her lies and continuing lies.

THE BENGHAZI HEARING AND CROOKED HILLARY CLINTON'S LOSING IT.

TIME TO ARREST AND PROSECUTE HILLARY CLINTON - MIKE ADAMS

For deep corruption... The Clinton Foundation, a bribery and racketeering scheme of astonishing scale.

It is now abundantly obvious that if America is to survive as a nation of law and order, Hillary Clinton must be arrested, indicted and prosecuted for her deep corruption and criminal racketeering. Furthermore, every individual still supporting Hillary Clinton for President needs to be rudely reminded that they are supporting an insidious globalist criminal who ferociously abuses her power by operating an illegal influence racket which surreptitiously funnels hundreds of millions of dollars through the Clinton Foundation.

It is time to indict and arrest Hillary Clinton and end this sad, dark era of deep corruption, deception and criminality at the highest levels of our national government.

From a bombshell Associated Press investigation:- More than half the people outside the government who met with Hillary Clinton while she was secretary of state gave money — either personally or through companies or groups — to the Clinton Foundation. 

The AP goes on to report, "the 85 donors contributed as much as $156 million" to the Clinton Foundation, after which Hillary Clinton deployed her influence as Secretary of State to "reward" those donors with huge government favors or approvals of their international moneymaking schemes. Some of those schemes included clear-cutting forests in Colombia. As described by Brietbart.com 

[J]ust after Hillary and Bill Clinton spent an evening with the president of Colombia, the government of Colombia promptly granted exclusive approval to Prima Colombia Properties. That company was owned by longtime Clinton Foundation donor Frank Giustra, As Schweizer writes:

Days after Hillary left Bogota, Prima Colombia Properties, which Frank Giustra has ownership interest in through a shell company called Flagship Industries, announced that it had acquired the right to cut timber in a biologically diverse forest on the pristine Colombian shoreline. 

Giustra has a long history with the Clintons, giving the foundation over $100 million and allowing Bill to use his plane some 26 times. Giustra allegedly used his connection with Bill to gain connections to the Kazakh government, benefitting his companies. Giustra was also a major shareholder in Uranium One, and his former partners allegedly benefited heavily from the relationship between Uranium One leadership and the Clintons when Hillary’s State Department looked the other way on Russia’s buy-up of the uranium company.

Giustra has a long history with the Clintons, giving the foundation over $100 million and allowing Bill to use his plane some 26 times. Giustra allegedly used his connection with Bill to gain connections to the Kazakh government, benefitting his companies. Giustra was also a major shareholder in Uranium One, and his former partners allegedly benefited heavily from the relationship between Uranium One leadership and the Clintons when Hillary’s State Department looked the other way on Russia’s buy-up of the uranium company. 

Hillary Clinton's "pay to play" corruption ultimately served the interests of oil magnates, weapons development companies and open pit coal mining corporations. "It’s against federal law for charities to act in the interests of private business or individuals," reports the New York Post. "Yet the Clinton Foundation secured high-paying gigs for its namesakes and helped for-profit corporations with family ties set up lucrative deals."

That same NY Post article adds:

Recently, the foundation announced it would ban donations from corporations and foreign countries if Hillary is elected president. The question is: If it’s a conflict of interest when Hillary will be president, why wasn’t it a problem when she was secretary of state?

If you want a "favor" from Hillary Clinton, you have to cough up millions of dollars first

What every international business person running any sort of profiteering scheme knows today is that to get a meeting with the Secretary of State, you first have to donate huge dollars to the Clinton Foundation. It's classic "pay for play," and it's illegal.

Flatly stated, Bill and Hillary Clinton are career criminals who have been running a grand scale criminal racketeering scheme to defraud America and peddle political influence to the highest bidder. Sometimes, the bribery money was given directly to Bill Clinton as "payment" for his "speeches." Soon after, Hillary would initiate some State Dept. action in favor of the organization that paid Bill $250,000 or more for his speech. Voila! It's political magic!

By peddling their political influence while collecting money as either "donations" or "speeches," the Clintons have committed global political fraud and racketeering at an astonishing scale. And because of the extreme left-wing media which covers for all the crimes of all Democrats, they've continued to get away with it!

Now, their extraordinary reign of corruption and criminality is finally coming to an end. It is time to end this Hillary Clinton bid for the presidency and put her behind bars where she belongs.

The Presidency has already been SOLD OUT by crooked Hillary

The $156 million paid to the Clinton Foundation by 85 donors was only the beginning of the racketeering and corruption, by the way. According to the Associated Press, another $170 million came from foreign donors. "Clinton met with representatives of at least 16 foreign governments that donated as much as $170 million to the Clinton charity, but they were not included in AP’s calculations because such meetings would presumably have been part of her diplomatic duties."

In other words, what's really happening here is that the Clintons have collected hundreds of millions of dollars in bribes and payoffs while leveraging their positions of government influence to grant regulatory decisions, approvals and other favors to those who coughed up the most money.

This is deep, criminal corruption at its worst. The hundreds of millions of dollars in "pay to play" donations to the Clinton Foundation means that Hillary Clinton has already pre-sold the White House to foreign interests.

This means that if she is elected President, she will be prioritizing the globalist interests of her rich donors over the interests of Americans. Hillary isn't just willing to sell you out, she's already sold you out!

The Clintons must be stopped

We the People simply cannot allow this traitorous criminal to attain the highest political seat in the nation. She is a clear enemy of America and an international racketeering and money laundering mafia boss. The FBI -- if it has any loyalty to law and order whatsoever -- must go public with recommendations of charges of corruption against the Clintons.

And all those left-wing media outlets and shameless celebrities pushing for Clinton should be absolutely ashamed of themselves for promoting such a lawless, traitorous criminal. Their support for Clinton just shows the absolute lawlessness and political criminality that infests the minds of many on the political left. Their slogan is "win at all costs," even if it means voting for a murdering criminal engaged in deep acts of political corruption.

Only through the independent media can you now learn the truth about the Hillary Clinton criminal racket and long list of dead people who once had dirt on the Clintons. Recognize that these people are extreme criminals. If they seize power yet again in Washington, it's over for not just America, but the entire independent media. (Many indy media journalists will quickly find themselves arrested and imprisoned by the Clinton regime, if not killed outright.)

The answer to all this is, of course,Donald J. Trump. If you're fed up with the criminality and corruption of the Clintons, vote for Donald Trump and give America one last fighting chance against the globalist political cartels that are seeking the complete subversion and occupation of America.

Clinton Cash - Official Movie Premiere

PHILIPPINES PRESIDENT DUTERTE GIVES UNITED NATIONS THE MIDDLE FINGER?

Icheoku says he ran and won the election as Philippines president, promising to take the fight to drug dealers and criminals; and the people accepted his message and voted him into power. Few months following his  being sworn in, the fiery militant president of Philippines, Rodrigo Duterte, has studiously been carrying out his election promise.  Thus far, 1,800 "criminals" in Philippines have been killed and just within only seven weeks of his being in power. Icheoku says the world once had a butcher of Baghdad; but whether the same scenario will play out in Manilla is too early to conclude. 

Icheoku says possibly the situation in Philippines is that bad with the society being incrementally laid waste by the activities of these nefarious men and women of the underground opiate business. But whether it calls for such a drastic and draconian solution of extra judicial summary executions is debatable; admitted many of his current critics are not at the tip of the sword of the devastating effects of drugs in the Philippines society to second guess his motive.  Possibly he means well and is acting purely altruistic and in what he considers the best interest of his people like every patriotic president, elected to protect his people, would. Killing of these "criminals" might not be the best civilized approach all things considered; but who is the world to judge what is best for the Philippines, especially their very peculiar challenges dealing with effects of drugs in their society considered. 

Icheoku says considering the motives of drug dealers which is purely profit and easy money, without regard to the far reaching consequences of their products which have wasted so many lives and rendered many others unlivable, may be they rightly deserved to be treated like lepers of society that has to be completely annihilated. What use is drugs in any society other than to damage the society's fabric, rendering so many citizens mentally useless, homicidal and maniacal. Therefore there is really nothing wrong with fighting this fire with fire; and treating the purveyors of illicit drugs as enemies of state and invaders that has to be squashed. Like vermin of the society, their complete eradication might be in order and so, President Rodrigo Duterte should be encouraged rather than the current chastisement for adopting the seemingly extreme measure to try and rid Philippines of these "criminals." 

Icheoku says provided the real "criminals" are identified, isolated and specifically targeted; and that innocent people are not targeted and randomly chosen for elimination, then all is good and dandy. William Shakespeare in one of his plays Measure for Measure, aptly analogized similar situations that one does not take a knife to a gun fight. If the intention of those drug dealers is to kill Philippines citizens, which their illicit products do anyway, the Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte as the defender in chief of the people, reserves every right to fight to protect his victimized people. Whatever action, including putting fear of God in these heartless "criminals" with his unorthodox crime fighting initiative, should be applauded rather than condemned. 

Therefore the recent condemnation of his "kill the "criminals" campaign by the United Nations was uncalled for. President Rodrigo Duterte's ire was well earned when told the UN to mind their own business and to butt out of a purely internal affairs of the Philippines. 

In his reaction, President Rodrigo Duterte threatened to pull Philippines out of the United Nations and to form a parallel organization with China and African countries. According to the president, the United Nations is seemingly heavily biased in their selective watchdog duties as they kept blind eye to the carnage in Syria and Iraq but are rushing off to condemn his own attempt at eradication of criminals similar to those "terrorists" being killed in the two mentioned countries. President Duterte reasoned, where is the justicialities in the killings of those being killed in the two conflict countries; yet the same United Nations has not called the countries engaged in those killings but found time to butt into his actions in the Philippines. Why is compliance to human rights obligations subjective and not universally enforced? 

He maintained that it is not only Philippines or other small countries that is under obligation to comply to international obligations and illegal killings. In President Rodrigo Détente's own words, he said: "May be we will just have to decide to separate from the United Nations. If you are that rude, son of a bitch, we will just leave you. Look at the iconic boy that was taken out from the rubble and he was made to sit in the ambulance and we saw it. Why is it that United States is not doing anything? I do not read you. Anybody in that stupid body complaining about the stench there of death? I don't give a sit about them. They are the ones interfering. Why are you Americans killing the black people there; shooting them down when they are already on the ground? Answer that question, because even if it's just one or two or three, it is still human rights violations." 

The president ended his retort by stating that the United Nations' threat to try him for crimes against humanity does not faze him and that he is not afraid of sacrificing his life and presidency for his people. Icheoku says exactly the stuff a leader is made of - ability to make up his mind, make decisions in the best interest of the people, take actions and defend against being bullied around, especially by holier than thou peoples, organizations and countries. Icheoku says let President Rodrigo Duterte be Duterte; and since he has the support of the Philippines people, should be allowed to fight drug epidemic in the Philippines as he sees fit and proper. Funny enough, none of those condemning him said anything against or in condemnation of those drug dealers. But hey, it is the way of the world and hypocritical Pharisees are everywhere.

ICHEOKU says would you elect this person and put her in charge of your affairs and children's future? Just watch and then decide.

AFRICAN-AFRICAN AMERICANS VOTING HILLARY CLINTON, WAIT A MINUTE?

Icheoku says any African-African American, from which ever country in mother continent,  in America, voting in this election, must ask him or herself who among the two candidates truly earned and deserves his or her vote this November? The good news however, which will help make this assessment much easier, is that none of the two candidates has a running mate who is either black or a minority; hence no special circumstance to warrant voting either way. 

Both tickets are 100% white caucasians and have automatically, equally and completely, isolated blacks and other minorities of America, period. Hillary Clinton's much touted love for blacks and minorities of America was not showed in whom she chose to run with her as her running mate vice presidential candidate. The same way, Donald Trump also settled for an equally white vice presidential running mate. Like the people of Israel said to David in 1King 12:16, blacks and other minorities of America should in one voice say to both candidates, 'we have no inheritance in the house of Jesse, to our tents, oh Americans'.

So before voting this November, please first ask yourself why should you vote for any of the two candidates. Thereafter,  vote decisively, knowing fully well that you voted out of your freewill and convictions; and that you voted for something and not necessarily against someone, simply because of some hatred generated against a particular candidate due to what he said and not necessarily what he did. 

Icheoku says what wrong has Donald Trump done to African Africans American that should warrant any vote against him? As far as records are concerned, the answer is nothing, zilch and nada; hence their votes should overwhelmingly swing accordingly in his favor. On the other hand, Hillary Clinton has wronged African African Americans and for so long, that any African African American voting her should examine his or her conscience very well to ensure that he is not casting his or her vote just for the heck of it and unconsciously and unconscionably too.  

Icheoku says first, her husband Bill Clinton did not grant amnesty to African Africans in America throughout his eight years in office; and Hillary Clinton was a de facto president, being such a powerful First Lady, who could have swayed him but chose not to. Secondly, her husband President Bill Clinton refused to stop the genocide of Rwanda and rather stood by and watched as over 800,000 Africans perished in that mass murder and reprisal killings, while they watched the carnage in the White House. Then on grants and aids and poverty alleviation, the couple failed Africa woefully too. As Secretary of State, the only thing Hillary Clinton did for Africa was to murder King of Africa Muommar Gaddafi and for no apparent reason whatsoever other than to gratify her cravings and she later gloated about it. 

According to her sadistic exhilaration following the gruesome and tortuous murder of Gaddafi, Hillary Clinton was on record laughingly saying "We came, we saw and he died." So ask yourselves is this type of personality, who will simply take out an African leader for the fun of it, deserving of your votes of confidence? What did Gaddafi do to deserve being hunted down like a dog and tortured to a painful death; and even in death, was still humiliated further with a desert burial in an unmarked grave? This is an African leader we are talking about; yet this woman humiliated him and by extension the whole of Africa, by treating him with such disdainful scorn, even in death. Culturally, Africans do not desecrate their dead but this woman did to our African King. 

Icheoku says this is a Gaddafi that surrendered his entire nuclear weaponry program; paid compensation of over $250 million to the Lockerbie plane disaster victims; surrendered and handed over for prosecution the alleged mastermind of the bombing, who was tried, convicted and imprisoned; opened his oil reserves for Western oil companies and signed exploration agreements with them; visited New York with a plea for a new direction and friendly relationship and even called Obama his own son in the African tradition of figuratively adopting sons and daughters. 

That Gaddafi led a transparent government in Libya is without a doubt and was developing his country with zero corruption; as well as helping other African countries with developmental aids. Icheoku recalls when he also helped Sani Abacha with seven hundred million dollars to help cushion the effects of Western sanctions. So why kill this new-leaf Gaddafi, any sensible African African would ask? Yet his killer wants African Africans Americans to give her with their votes of approval and help her become the next president of the United States of America? Icheoku says please fellas, think again and think seriously about voting for Hillary Clinton, because if you do, the blood of Gaddafi is equally on your head too.Gaddafi does not deserve to be killed and someone killed him and her name is Hillary Rodham Clinton and she is running for office to become president of America and with your votes you can stop her.

Secondly, ask yourselves why President Jonathan of Nigeria was toppled and in his place, Hillary Clinton and co preferred a former despot who has killed Nigerians before and who is very anti democracy. What was Jonathan's fault other than not yielding to the same sex homosexual gay lobby to allow Nigeria become another Sodom and Gomorrah? Now Nigerians are biting concrete of hardship under their anointed one President Muhammadu Buhari and it is funny? It is also on record that her sponsor President Barack Obama has snubbed Nigeria and refused to visit the most populous black country throughout his eight years in office. Icheoku says something is wrong with any African African American still in bed with this people and a time has never been more right than this election to tell them that you remembered.

Then enter the Boko Haram madness and how the same clique refused to sell weapons to Nigeria with which to fight and defeat these monsters. How mean could anyone be to watch a people being slaughtered and stand idly by and do nothing to help and then still refuse to sell them weapons to fight off the scourge? They will not sell weapons to Nigeria and they also strong-armed other countries not to sell weapons to a beleaguered government under the threat of Boko Haram islamists madmen trying to overrun it. Needless to add that the same Hillary Clinton once said that Boko Haram are mere Northern Nigerian Muslim youths protesting the North's marginalization by a Southern Christian president. A person with such wild-eyed assessment of the dreaded Boko Haram murderers is now gunning to become president and you will indulge her with your votes?

Lastly, that the same Hillary Clinton called African American males 'Super Predators' is yet another reason why you should not vote for her. Instead, if you cannot get yourself to vote for Donald Trump, then do not vote at all. But please do not in all conscience vote for such a candidate who has shown complete disdain for the black race. Every African African American must free themselves from the existing mental slavery and perversive plantation mentality which has yoked down African Americans into voting in a particular way; and with their votes, chastise Hillary Clinton for not being a good advocate of black causes, especially in issues affecting the African continent. Before you vote in this election, ask yourself how would King of Africa Muommar Gaddafi vote and then listen to his anguish cry from the land beyond and then vote wisely. Please DO NOT VOTE HILLARY CLINTON, she killed Gaddafi and was gleeful about his murder.

OLYMPICS 2016 ENDS: SO LONG RIO, WELCOME TOKYO.

Icheoku says the festivities of the world, marking global friendship, concludes in Rio de Janeiro  Brazil and off to Tokyo Japan it goes in 2020. 

Icheoku says despite all the initial snafus and doubts whether or not Brazil was ready for the Olympics games, the games held and concluded without any major incident, either as to security or provisions of amenities. Icheoku says congratulations to host country Brazil and city Rio for a well conducted Olympics and hopefully they broke even hosting the event. See you in Tokyo in 2020. Ciao.

RIO OLYMPICS 2016 FOOTBALL FINALS: - BRAZIL WINS, NIGERIA WINS.

Icheoku says Neymar led his Brazillian U-23 team to the finals, defeating Germany 5 - 4 in penalty kicks to win the gold medal. Nigeria on the other side, led by Mikel Obi, beat Honduras 3 - 2 to win the bronze medal. Icheoku says congratulations to Brazil and Nigeria for their victories in the finals of the Rio Olympics Under-23 football tournament. 

TRUMP'S BOGEY MAN SCARE, A BAIT AND HOOK DIVERSIONARY TACTIC.

Icheoku says Republican Party presidential candidate, Donald John Trump, is definitely not the bogey man the Clinton machine and their media allies are trying desperately so hard to paint, make and create out of him. The Clintons campaign have tried the battle of ideas and issues as well as policies but are finding it extremely difficult to snatch the narrative, hence the switch to diversionary tactic of paint him so bad looking that the people would run away from him to any other available shelter, including one manned by Hillary Clinton. A case of Donald Trump is the devil and Hillary Clinton is the deep blue sea; perhaps she might spring up a Nineveh whale to come to the rescue and carry you to safety with Hillary Clinton. 

Icheoku says admitted that there have been some not so kosher answers and responses to some questions over the campaign period; but a campaign is like a job interview and a man who has never interviewed for a job in his life, talkless of ever auditioning for the highest office in the land, the presidency, is not expected to be as seasoned in the art of playing fast ball with questions but answers them as it comes to him straight from the heart. Donald Trump is not used to filtering words and statements nor the art of politically correct speaking. Unlike the other camp's entrenched politician, Hillary Clinton, who is given to telling lies and have told so much lies that it would last her a lifetime. Icheoku says Crooked Hillary Clinton have a repertoire of decades of lying her way through so many things that lying has become an integral part of who she is. As between Hillary Clinton and lies, they are but a siamese twins incapable of separation from one another. 

Icheoku says should a job interview be the sole indicator that a prospective employee could not and would not do the job for which he or she is being interviewed if hired? Icheoku says no, as there could be some other factors that inhibited the interview experience; including stage fright and not given to putting up facades and pretenses usually associated with such job auditioning. Icheoku instead of the none existent monster, the Hillary Clinton's team is trying to paint Donald Trump, the American people should look closer to see in Donald Trump, a man who could do the job of the presidency; being a CEO of several reputable companies and has successfully ran them till date. Donald Trump will be the best president Americans would ever have and Donald Trump should be given the opportunity to bring his CEO mindset to bear on America's governance. Donald Trump will help repair the damage of the so many years which entrenched political interests have sat upon, refusing to do something about it and will not do anything about because they don't want their applecart to be upturned. 

It is a rule of the thumb that when people are scared, they would run to safety and away from the source of scare. Often times it is always a case of two opposing scares sandwiching the people from which they seek an escape path. Such people are usually forced to take the path of the less resistance. Team Hillary Clinton has figured out this and also that no American wants any more of the Clintons, hence their resort to discrediting Donald Trump to make him unacceptable option. The Clintons are painting Donald Trump as a toothy monster from hell, who would devour Americans if they did not run away from him and as fast as possible. Their mantra, if Donald Trump is horrific, Hillary Clinton is less threatening. If Donald Trump will eat you alive; at least Hillary Clinton will first mercifully kill you before eating you? If Donald Trump will chastise you with scorpions, Hillary Clinton will only use whip? To Team Crooked Hillary, American people should just come to them simply because  they will not be as cannibalistic as the other guy. 

Icheoku says just understand that the Hilary Clinton side are not saying that they are good people, only that the other guy is worser. Thus begging the question, how was the determination made that as between a person who is part of the problems facing America, having been entrenched in politics for the past forty something odd years; and a novitiate who is still taking baby steps foray into politics, that the later is or could be a worst evil than the problem herself that the later wants to solve. Icheoku says buying into this illogicality is simply a passport to mental asylum and should therefore be rejected by the American people. This election is about change and solving the so many problems starring American people down. Only one man can do it. He is passionate; he is patriotic and he has a can-do attitude and have so many accomplishments to back his words. That man is Donald John Trump and Icheoku says America, cast your lot with him and elect him the next president.