Monday, November 7, 2011
SHARON BIALEK, HER INCREDIBLE AND INCREDULOUS PRESS CONFERENCE?
Icheoku without mincing words says that Ms Sharon Bialek, the alleged face and voice of Herman Cain's sexually harassed women, is incredible and her account of what allegedly transpired between her and the Republican Party presidential nominee wanna-be front-runner, Herman Cain, is rather incredulous. One needs to suspend disbelief and put on his unthinking hat to believe such a concocted story of an unwanted sexual move gone awry. There are simply too many issues that render her account of Herman Cain's alleged aggression highly improbable and if, it was with her full consent and lead-on. First let us consider her jovial demeanor at the press conference which is rather unusual for a woman suffering emotional distress on account of her privacy being violated in the manner described. Icheoku says any woman who really went through what she stated happened to her in the hands of Herman Cain would be seething in anger and even tear up with description of the minutia. But none was the case, a matter made worse sided by her attorney, Gloria Allred, who demeaned the alleged encounter as a "stimulus package?" Icheoku asks, where was her emotional grief if what she alleged truly took place as we did not see any?
Dissecting the alleged sexual encounter story, could somebody please explain to Icheoku why it took this woman fourteen long years to come forward; if what allegedly happened then was not consensual and she is not now being used as a tool to pull Herman Cain's campaign down and get him out of the way. If she felt so violated as stated, why did she not complain to the police then and have Herman Cain prosecuted for unwanted and unsolicited sexual offense and violation against her person? Icheoku is not so dumb as to buy into her reality-show styled explanation that she felt too embarrassed then to file charges? Icheoku asks, if it was too embarrassing then to come forward or file charges, why is it no longer embarrassing now, after fourteen long years had passed by, to come forward belatedly to make this accusation? What changed or like some commentator said, she appeared to be under some influence during the conference that impacted her demeanor?
It is also instructive that this woman is a single mom and you wonder who the kid's father is and whether she had him outside wedlock or if there was a divorce, the reason for the divorce? Such traits are very important as they point to the character traits and veracity of the accuser, who Icheoku believes, is targeting television reality-shows, talk-show appearances and possibly looking at some money making opportunities in Hollywood with her after-thought allegations or for whatever the weight, her fourteen year old sexual encounter with Herman Cain
The second issue that bogs Icheoku watching Ms Sharon Bialek's press conference is her reading of a prepared and well scripted text of what she alleged happened, instead of just an off-the-cuff rattling out of the encounter since she is the person with direct personal knowledge and her recollection should not be an issue or so fuzzy as to put them down in ink before the press conference. Needless to add that she refused and did not take questions from the press corp gathered? Icheoku says if Ms Sharon Bialek was truthful and candid about the encounter, she wouldn't necessary need the assistance of a script to tell her story; so the very act of her reading from a lawyer's well choreographed script, fourteen years after the encounter tasks the veracity and truthfulness of the alleged. Who needs a written and vetted and possibly coached script to recall what happened to her body in the hands of sexual predator which they are ganging up to make Herman Cain? Just watch her demeanor throughout the press conference and you would see a woman who is not sure of what she was stating as happened; but who is just out to do a job to take Herman Cain out. Icheoku just wonders how much she was paid or promised for the theater displayed which disturbed millions of rational people's mind who were able to lift the veil and read between the lines.
Following closely to her incredulity is the issue of the minute details of that encounter which she readily recollected, such as what she was wearing that night and the fact that Herman Cain's shirt was unbuttoned even remembering the colors of their clothes? Icheoku says I don't know about you, but I do not personally remember with exactitude, the clothes I had on just last Friday, talkless of fourteen years ago. But here is Ms Sharon Bialek telling the world the colors of the clothes they had on and you wonder if the color blue is recognizable at night?
Then the question of how she first met and knew Herman Cain so well as to be invited for a meeting in Washington DC through the night that required her overnight stay? Why didn't she decline the offer of an expensive hotel suite provided courtesy of Herman Cain if she was not seriously thinking about a liaison with him that night by necessary implication of her accepting the pass being made with such a luxurious hotel accommodation? If a man who is not related to you either familial or professionally, pays for a very expensive hotel suite for you and you accept it, what message were you sending to him by such acceptance of his offer? That no, I will enjoy your hotel suite but there will be nothing for you?
A defense would also excavate the possible reason there could be why Herman Cain needed to rush into the accuser's privates in a parked car in a parking lot, when they had the whole night to explore their crevices following a sumptuous fine dinner and wining in an Italian restuarant when there is an expensive hotel suite waiting their romantic arrival? Certain conducts involving dates and romance are not often vocalized but implied - an expensive hotel suite was offered by Herman Cain and she accepted same without any precondition or objection; even when according to her account, Herman Cain actively reminded her that he was the one who upgraded her tiny room to an expensive suite, she merely giggled her appreciation? Icheoku says if Ms Bialek was not looking forward to something that night with Herman Cain and thereby lead Herman Cain on or was not totally convinced on what the night with as progressing into, she would have raised an objection at the earliest time when the expensive hotel suite was offered to her. She would have at least informed Herman Cain upfront that she hopes the suite was in-gratis and not a quid pro quo gift offered for something in return. That she would only accept such an expensive hotel suite gift conditionally - on the condition that she does not give her body to him in return. But no, instead she played along just to get a job only to fourteen years later, have a change of mind?
It is ridiculously unbelievable. According to her account, Herman Cain put his hand on her lap, then navigated it towards up her legs and into her vagina and one wonders why she did not stop Herman Cain cold at the onset of his expedition? Icheoku asks why did Ms Sharon Bialek wait until Herman Cain's fingers made contact with her clits, and not at the moment he made the initial contact with her body, before she complained? What was she wearing that night that gave Herman Cain such an easy access up her privates? Was she wearing a thong, panties, pantie-hose or was she butt-naked just to seduce a possible employer? Did she invite the encounter by overt flirtations and mannerisms which suggested a come-on; and would Herman Cain been dismissed as not a real man if he did not bite the bait? Did she slap Herman Cain for violating her privates or was she like the hotel maid in New York who merely changed her mind after a consensual sexual encounter with the Frenchman Dominique Strauss Kahn? Icheoku is not just buying into her story as there appear to be so many smoking mirrors that needs to be defogged for clarity.
Icheoku wants to know did Herman Cain touch her suggestively, whispered some soothing love-monologues into her ear, first kissed her and she kissed him back leading him to believe that she is open about further exploration of her womanhood? Icheoku is loosing his mind trying to put a handle on this accuser's account of what happened as no reasonable man would so suddenly thrust his hand into a woman's vagina without first getting the green-light that it is okay to so do. Usually most sexual dalliances starts with smooth words, soft touches, kisses and then explorations; so why must this episode be starkly different? Who hired this woman to take out Herman Cain?
Icheoku is not in anyway holding brief for Herman Cain or supporting his far-fetched presidential nomination effort; but let the wrongly accused be defended as Ms Sharon Bialek's story is rather too difficult to believe as is. We all know the power of the butt and how some lecherous women deploy same to get whatever they want including jobs, promotions and raises? If this woman was truly going to meet Herman Cain without a prior calculated plan of offering herself to him in order to get a job, why did she not travel with her boyfriend to meet him? Why did she go alone to Washington DC to meet a man who is not related to her in anyway and warranting her to spend the night? She accepted an upgraded hotel suite at the expensive Capitol Hilton in Washington DC, a dinner at an Italian restaurant that must have cost some pretty pennies, enough drinks to cure some jitters which may have been some fine bubbly champagne or other impressive red wine and then what did she expect thereafter? That the man, fully blooded, would just say see you tomorrow, Ciao Bellisima?
Who is fooling who and who is really misleading the gullible Republican Party's primary electorates but a woman who is being used as a weapon of mass destruction to destroy Herman Cain's blossoming campaign; hired by people who now see Herman Cain as a threat to their agenda to get a white person into their White House in 2012? Hear this shameless and irrational woman state her story, "Instead of going into the office he suddenly reached over and put his hand on my leg, under my skirt and reached for my genitals; and thereafter brought my head towards his crotch?" Icheoku says anyone who have attempted sexual relationship in a car would vouch for the difficulty in having one's hand inside a vagina while at the same time pushing a woman's head unto the penis for a BJ while seating side by side with one another. Ask yourself, what would make Herman Cain to "suddenly reach over the woman's skirt" when he reasonably had the expectation to get some anyway through the night? This narrative sounds like a process that involved some time from hand on the leg to under skirt and then vagina; so the question remains why did Ms Sharon Bialek not stop Herman Cain's sexual advances when he first put his hand on her leg?
And all Ms Sharon Bialek has to prove that what she is alleging took place are two signed documents, one by her former boyfriend and another by a friend businessman; and Icheoku wonders what their motives are in signing such a hearsay document of she said, without any more collaboration? It is also needless to add that they were not deposed contemporaneously following the incident or so soon immediately after it came to their knowledge. What an offensive nonsensical thrash. It is also instructive that Herman Cain had dined and wined this particular woman on more than one occasion in the past eliciting the question, which able-bodied man would not interpret her mannerisms as a green-light to press on assuming that what was alleged took place?
Icheoku asks, if according to her account she told Herman Cain that being intimate with him that night was not what she came for, why did she accept all the favors that are usually incidental prelude to having a sexual relationship such as an upgraded hotel suite, a fine dinner at an exotic Italian restaurant in addition to some expensive drinks? What were Ms Sharon Bialek's reasonable expectation as she burnt Herman Cain's bills that evening both in the expensive hotel suite as well as the Italian restaurant or did she mistook him for an eunuch and a father Christmas? In conclusion, Icheoku rebuts and rejects the claim that Sharon Bialek is the face and voice for women who had been sexually harassed by Herman Cain. She is but a hired cunt doing a hatchet job for whoever paid her for this theater that wants Herman Cain's campaign imploded. To Herman Cain, Icheoku urges you to soldier on and never fall prey to this time-worn out tactic of getting one out through the backdoor. If they are good enough and feels good about their chances, let them allow Republican Party primary voters to decide who their presidential candidate shall be. Please do not succumb to the modern-styled lynching being orchestrated by some party with interest who would not want to see a guaranteed black occupation of the White House in 2012 which your nomination will portend. They want to shut your campaign down but you must not let them; you must never surrender, you must never cower down by these useless belated allegations. They are orchestrated and they are their words against yours, so?