BOULDER SUPERMARKET SHOOTING: WHITE PEOPLE SUFFER RACISM TOO.

ICHEOKU says it seems that white people are not similarly entitled like other races to hate crime protection from racially motivated killing. Why do blacks, Asians, Hispanics and other minority groups enjoy this protection but white people are excluded from it and denied it or is white no longer a type of skin color? A Syrian Arab American Muslim planned a massacre of white people, purchased a rifle, drove for half an hour to a supermarket frequented by mostly white people and in a neighborhood that is largely white and unleashed his maximum terror, killing ten white people. But we are told that it has nothing to do with race or Muslim hatred for white people; and you ask yourself why then was the supermarket specifically targeted when there are other supermarkets around his own neighborhood and also along the 30 minutes drive roadway which he traveled before reaching the target supermarket. 

A week ago a gunman in Atlanta went into three massage parlors and shot eight people to death six of who are Asians and they told us he did it because of his hatred for Asians; that he is a white supremacist who does not like Asian people. This was despite the fact that the gunman had said it was not racially motivated and that he was only trying to cleanse his sexual addiction demons which those massage parlors were facilitating. Even the FBI backed him up, stating that the shootings was not racially motivated, but it was still not enough to persuade the race baiters of America to back off from their Asian hate narrative. Is it just because the gunman in Atlanta is white, thus begging the question is it only when a gunman is a white person that such killing arises to a racially motivated shooting. 

Imagine how ironical it is that two identical cases of the literally the same fact pattern could be so differently branded and you wonder why. Only five days apart from each other and the narrative rapidly changed just because of who is being scapegoated, white people. Two gun violences in America are being interpreted differently just because of the skin colors of those who were killed and the persons who did the killings. They blamed anti Asian hatred for one and then easy availability of guns in America on the other despite that both men took guns into business premises and murdered their victims respectively. Yet one of them is branded a white supremacist and the other we are forbidden to say that he is a white people hating Syrian American Muslim who hates President Donald John Trump with passion. He also propounds the Islamophobia gospel and hates homosexuals which he blames on white people's pervasion. 

How can a nation live with itself in such a lie and still expects to survive and thrive? Are these people saying that the white race cannot be racially targeted, singled out and attacked because of their skin color? Why was Atlanta massage parlors shooting anti Asians bias but Boulder supermarket shooting is not anti Whites bias? Suddenly Joe Biden would not speculate on the motive of the Boulder shooter but he did not waste time in speculating the motive of the Atlanta shooter, even when the shooter himself denied any racial motivation as well as the FBI which said there was no racial animus in the shooting. Joe Biden has also not announced when he and Kamala Harris will be visiting Boulder as they did with Atlanta to go and commiserate with the bereaving white families who lost their family members. 

Why are white people being this shafted in America and treated differently just because they are white? A Syrian Arab Muslim American takes a gun into a supermarket in a largely white city and in a predominately white neighborhood and killed 10 white people and there is no anti white animus in him that motivated his action. Really? He is a democrat and he is a devout Muslim who professed severally his hatred for white people. But unfortunately, Facebook have scrubbed his page in their effort to cover up his anti white people storied history, thus making it difficult to get a full insight into his demented mind. They do not want us to go there, discuss the fact that the Boulder supermarket killer is an Arab Muslim because it does not fit the accepted racial parody in America. It is reprehensible and condemnable what America has become, openly supporting bias against white people and treating hate crimes against them as non existent.

The Boulder supermarket killer, Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa, is a Syrian Arab American Muslim who migrated to America when he was a child but who was still schooled by his family into an Islamist with an acute anti white Americans bias. He did not hide his hatred for white people and he even called President Trump names including being a dick. He carefully planned and executed the murder of ten white Americans but they are telling us it was not a racially motivated hate crime. But the Atlanta shooter is a white guy and so his own shooting is automatically an anti Asians racist killing simply because some Asians were among his victims. That two of his victims were white people did not matter to these people as they dismissed their death as merely their being at the wrong place at the wrong time. ICHEOKU says how about the Boulder victims, were they also at the wrong place at the wrong time or were they minding their own business when a white hating Islamist specifically targeted them for elimination. It boggles the mind trying to understand the rationale for this absurd distinctions as it is either both killings are gun violences or they were racially motivated.