So President Barack Obama spoke as a blackman, who knows how it means to be a 'nigger' in America society. That is the real America the world does not know about, but which is the undercurrent of the society, where a man is primarily judged by the color of his skin and not necessarily the content of his character or his true abilities? There is simmering tension in the land and hopefully it will not ever boil over; with each passing day, a man's heart somewhere in America is boiling with vengeful thoughts on how to get at someone or render a pay-back? But what is the solution, Icheoku asks? A good staring point is for us all to start talking about our differences and as often as the opportunity calls; and in an open honest manner. That way the walls of prejudices will begin to crumble in earnest as we understand one another better; but to continue to pretend that all is well or that prejudices of race does not exist or that things are honky-dory is a fallacy of the moment which incubates in American society and that is what fuels each person's suspicion of one another. Icheoku proclaims that racism exists and cuts across everyone in America, whether whites, blacks, Latinos, Asians, Native-Americans etc. It is all about protecting what each thinks is his rightful entitlement and the preservation of their race? Let us acknowledge that fact, and then we can take the next step towards exploring ways of improving and making it better?
And so it was that a neighbor could no longer recognise her neighbor in a sunny afternoon daylight in Cambridge Massachusetts; that she called 911 and reported her neighbor as a break-in suspect? But that 'break-in suspect' neighbor was merely trying to push his way into his own house, having misplaced his keys earlier in the day? The police came and the neighbor who was already lounging in his house, was marched off in handcuffs and the rest is now history. Not being on video, we can only rely on "he said, he said" account of what transpired that fateful July 16, 2009 day in Cambridge Massachusetts. Whether the Cambridge police department was "deeply pained" by President Barack Obama's statement or not, Icheoku does not really care to know; but suffice it to say that Mr. President's comment was borne out of frustration that some sections of the American society are still treating disrespectfully, fellow Americans as if they are second-class citizens? Our position is that two wrongs does not make a right and the Cambridge police chief should have avoided joining issues with the president. We all should rather find a way of bridging the racial divide in America instead of protesting the obvious or being in denial as to what really exists.
Sgt. James Crowley, as a professional police office, would have after confirming the identity of the accused, conduct a cursory visual sweep of the home to further confirm through pictures and artifacts that Professor Gates is, who he said he is? This way, the whole world would have been saved all these pains of re-starting conversation on race. The matter would have died off quietly, but instead subsequent events prolonged an otherwise police check into the spat which is percolating through our society today. Also, it is very surprising that Officer Crowley does not know or recognise Professor Gates whose eminence is world-wide and a network television persona. Also, being one of the few academia in Harvard makes him a 'sticking sore-thumb', standing out conspicuously in Cambridge and requiring no further introduction? But no, may be through over-zealousness or the rush to be a police officer before this university professor, Sgt Crowley over-reached and today, the world is focusing at Cambridge as another American city with a profiling police department? Icheoku says, if this could happen to a person of Professor Gates stature, imagine what the average Joe blackman is going through in America and this is 2009 and not 1950? Governor Deval Patrick of Massachusetts chimed in to say he was troubled and upset over the incident; while Cambridge Mayor Denise Simmons, said had she spoke with Gates and apologized on behalf of the city, and issued a statement which called the July 16 incident "regrettable and unfortunate." Icheoku calls on all altercation parties to now sheath their sword; as many Americans have deduced what possibly transpired. As a society, we must learn how to treat each other with respect, understanding that we are all in it together as fellow Americans and this is what will help bring down the walls of racial tension in our society. Icheoku says, irrespective of the rage in the tone of a provoked Professor Gates, Sgt. Crowley would have shown a cooler head and carried out his duty more professionally? But bee that as it may, we beg to move on now from this matter!
Obama Was Right About the Gates Arrest
ReplyDeletedigg Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us ShareThis
Read More: Disorderly Conduct, Henry Louis Gates, Henry Louis Gates Arrested, James Crowley, President Obama, Race, Racial Profiling, Politics News
Be the First to Submit
This Story to DiggBuzz up! Get Breaking News Alerts
never spam
Share Print CommentsOn Thursday, President Obama weighed in on the arrest of African-American Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates, saying a Cambridge police officer "acted stupidly" when he arrested Gates for disorderly conduct. The next day, Obama backed down from his harsh comment.
Obama was right the first time.
I don't know if the police officer arrested Gates because of the Harvard professor's race. A lot of white people would say that if they mouthed off to a cop, they too would be arrested.
But one thing is clear: Gates did not violate any law. Under Massachusetts law, which the police officer was supposedly enforcing, yelling at a police officer is not illegal.
There are clear decisions of the Massachusetts courts holding that a person who berates an officer, even during an arrest, is not guilty of disorderly conduct. And yet that is exactly what Gates was arrested for.
The Massachusetts statute defining "disorderly conduct" used to have a provision that made it illegal to make "unreasonable noise or offensively coarse utterance, gesture or display," or to address "abusive language to any person present." Yet the courts have interpreted that provision to violate the Massachusetts Constitution's guarantee of freedom of speech. So police cannot lawfully arrest a person for hurling abusive language at an officer.
In several cases, the courts in Massachusetts have considered whether a person is guilty of disorderly conduct for verbally abusing a police officer. In Commonwealth v. Lopiano, a 2004 decision, an appeals court held it was not disorderly conduct for a person who angrily yelled at an officer that his civil rights were being violated. In Commonwealth v. Mallahan, a decision rendered last year, an appeals court held that a person who launched into an angry, profanity-laced tirade against a police officer in front of spectators could not be convicted of disorderly conduct.
So Massachusetts law clearly provides that Gates did not commit disorderly conduct.
The Cambridge Police should be training their officers to know the difference between legal and illegal conduct. What Gates did was probably not so smart -- in general, be nice to people carrying guns -- but it wasn't disorderly conduct. At least not in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
That explains why the charges against Gates were dropped. It wasn't because the police were trying to defuse the situation. It was because Gates had done nothing illegal.
Arresting someone for doing something that isn't illegal is pretty stupid.
Then again, perhaps Obama was wrong. Maybe the police officer wasn't acting stupidly. He was just acting abusively. That is even worse.