ICHEOKU says apparently, American men have finally been vanquished and submitted by American women using the auspices of the #MeToo feminist movement. They are succeeding because of the reluctance of American men to fight back and push back against the #MeToo vermin. A crazed out band of vengeful feminists on the prowl, out to get even with men and pay them back for many years of submission to their macho culture and they show no mercy.
Now, even jokingly asking a pregnant woman and in a non threatening way, in a friendly work environment, "if the baby is mine" has become so offensive and sufficient to get one fired from his job. Really? Some people innocently use such an all embracing pronoun as endearment, including asking a married man how "our wife" is doing today in referencing his wife; or a married woman how "our husband" is doing today while asking about her husband. Some cultures even address a wife as "our wife" and a child as "our child", all purely as endearment but without any ulterior connotation whatsoever. Some neighbors often discipline unruly children of their neighbor based on the believe that children are their children too.
Such a sensitivity as was displayed in the matter of the exchange between a company's president and a staff while inquiring after her pregnancy does not rise to sexual harassment, no matter how examined. Therefore to fire a man from his job based on it is simply beyond any reasonable comprehension. The pregnant woman knew for a fact that she did not have sex with that man Troy Young and so did Troy Young; so she should have seen where Troy Young was coming from,, a purely endearment speak. But the deed is done and he has now become the latest victim of American feminist angst against American men and it is not good.
Anyway, Troy Young is a liberal feminist apologist, so it somewhat serves him right being a victim of a cancel culture ire which he somehow helped foist on society. He played dumb when other men were being harangued by the #MeToo vampires and now it is time for his own blood to be on their dinner table. Men who should have said something and been fighting back have kept quiet and this have emboldened these trouble makers who are uncomfortable in who they are and are trying to destroy any person with a penile appendage. But why is it only women who always allege all these sexual harassments, does it mean that women in high places do not equally sexually harass young men or are they protected by an acceptable norm that men don't kiss and tell.
ICHEOKU says it is about time the #MeToo cancel machine is knocked off their unmerited and undeserved high perch because they are ruining men's lives and without a care in the world about doing it. All they are after is displacing men in work places, causing them to be fired and taking over their positions. It is wrecking havoc in the society and it is not right. The other time it was MSNBC's Chris Matthews that they forced his ouster and they followed it up with the axing of FoxNews Ed Henry and now it is Hearst Magazine's President, Troy Young that they have wrangled his job. Who knows the next man for who their "take his job" bell tolls next.
Why have men become so intimidated by the antics of the #MeToo movement that they can hardly defend themselves, afraid of how they will be perceived by the same nemesis who are out to nail them. What is the point of men still remaining nice and worrying about what these women would think about them when their bayonets are dangerously dangling so close to their necks of livelihood and sometimes incarceration. What will it take for men to start fighting back against some of the falsehoods and made up stories of the #MeToo movement. ICHEOKU says strongly believes that some of these allegations are often not true or overly exaggerated and sometimes taken out of context as someone's harmless joke is mistaken for a sexual innuendo which was never the maker's intention when the word was uttered.
Where is the line of acceptable loose talk or office speak; or must men be forced to become heartless, unfeeling and uncaring robots who do not bath an eyelid in their work places and behave like walking dead in order to keep their jobs. Why do women get a pass but men do not or is some "hunt men down" quiet revolution taking place while men are oblivious of it. How many men will be pushed out of their job before enough becomes enough. It is long past time American men wake up from their "it wasn't me" slumber and start fighting back before all of them loses their jobs to the replacement crusade being orchestrated by these crazed out wild eyed feminist females of America. They want it all, they are vampiric and out to draw blood. They are cruel and they want to get their pound of flesh with blood, regardless of any argument Lady Portia might make to the contrary.
ICHEOKU often wonders why it is always in the best interest of every organization that an accused man summarily resigned, effective immediately. Couldn't an apology have sufficed in certain circumstances or must these men's heads be put on a platter. Don't these men have a livelihood to sustain, families to take care of, wives to make happy, kids to send to schools, mortgages to pay and other sundry expenses to make. Why does their needs not factor in when the decisions to force them out of their jobs are being made. Why does the #MeToo movement not weigh these anticipated hardships when they go after a man's job. Why are they so heartless and so mean as to upgrade harmless speak into sexual harassment, admitted that any well established case deserves to be punished. Enough of the #MeToo cancel culture; it has become a metastasized cancer ravaging American men. They have strayed too far and should be brought to a heel.
Now, even jokingly asking a pregnant woman and in a non threatening way, in a friendly work environment, "if the baby is mine" has become so offensive and sufficient to get one fired from his job. Really? Some people innocently use such an all embracing pronoun as endearment, including asking a married man how "our wife" is doing today in referencing his wife; or a married woman how "our husband" is doing today while asking about her husband. Some cultures even address a wife as "our wife" and a child as "our child", all purely as endearment but without any ulterior connotation whatsoever. Some neighbors often discipline unruly children of their neighbor based on the believe that children are their children too.
Such a sensitivity as was displayed in the matter of the exchange between a company's president and a staff while inquiring after her pregnancy does not rise to sexual harassment, no matter how examined. Therefore to fire a man from his job based on it is simply beyond any reasonable comprehension. The pregnant woman knew for a fact that she did not have sex with that man Troy Young and so did Troy Young; so she should have seen where Troy Young was coming from,, a purely endearment speak. But the deed is done and he has now become the latest victim of American feminist angst against American men and it is not good.
Anyway, Troy Young is a liberal feminist apologist, so it somewhat serves him right being a victim of a cancel culture ire which he somehow helped foist on society. He played dumb when other men were being harangued by the #MeToo vampires and now it is time for his own blood to be on their dinner table. Men who should have said something and been fighting back have kept quiet and this have emboldened these trouble makers who are uncomfortable in who they are and are trying to destroy any person with a penile appendage. But why is it only women who always allege all these sexual harassments, does it mean that women in high places do not equally sexually harass young men or are they protected by an acceptable norm that men don't kiss and tell.
ICHEOKU says it is about time the #MeToo cancel machine is knocked off their unmerited and undeserved high perch because they are ruining men's lives and without a care in the world about doing it. All they are after is displacing men in work places, causing them to be fired and taking over their positions. It is wrecking havoc in the society and it is not right. The other time it was MSNBC's Chris Matthews that they forced his ouster and they followed it up with the axing of FoxNews Ed Henry and now it is Hearst Magazine's President, Troy Young that they have wrangled his job. Who knows the next man for who their "take his job" bell tolls next.
Why have men become so intimidated by the antics of the #MeToo movement that they can hardly defend themselves, afraid of how they will be perceived by the same nemesis who are out to nail them. What is the point of men still remaining nice and worrying about what these women would think about them when their bayonets are dangerously dangling so close to their necks of livelihood and sometimes incarceration. What will it take for men to start fighting back against some of the falsehoods and made up stories of the #MeToo movement. ICHEOKU says strongly believes that some of these allegations are often not true or overly exaggerated and sometimes taken out of context as someone's harmless joke is mistaken for a sexual innuendo which was never the maker's intention when the word was uttered.
Where is the line of acceptable loose talk or office speak; or must men be forced to become heartless, unfeeling and uncaring robots who do not bath an eyelid in their work places and behave like walking dead in order to keep their jobs. Why do women get a pass but men do not or is some "hunt men down" quiet revolution taking place while men are oblivious of it. How many men will be pushed out of their job before enough becomes enough. It is long past time American men wake up from their "it wasn't me" slumber and start fighting back before all of them loses their jobs to the replacement crusade being orchestrated by these crazed out wild eyed feminist females of America. They want it all, they are vampiric and out to draw blood. They are cruel and they want to get their pound of flesh with blood, regardless of any argument Lady Portia might make to the contrary.
ICHEOKU often wonders why it is always in the best interest of every organization that an accused man summarily resigned, effective immediately. Couldn't an apology have sufficed in certain circumstances or must these men's heads be put on a platter. Don't these men have a livelihood to sustain, families to take care of, wives to make happy, kids to send to schools, mortgages to pay and other sundry expenses to make. Why does their needs not factor in when the decisions to force them out of their jobs are being made. Why does the #MeToo movement not weigh these anticipated hardships when they go after a man's job. Why are they so heartless and so mean as to upgrade harmless speak into sexual harassment, admitted that any well established case deserves to be punished. Enough of the #MeToo cancel culture; it has become a metastasized cancer ravaging American men. They have strayed too far and should be brought to a heel.
No comments:
Post a Comment