ICHEOKU says why the sudden loss of interest by the protectors of womanhood and defenders of the right of women over their vagina. Are some women not entitled to such protection and can be so flagrantly violated without recourse to any defense. What is going on America or is the double standards not too appalling that it violates every conscience and all tenets of fairness. Why should Harvey Weinstein be in prison and Justice Brett Kavanaug's nearly lost his Supreme Court nomination because of allegations of sexual misconducts, but no similar upheaval is being raised against Joe Biden for his alleged sexual assault on Ms Tara Reade.
What is fair is fair and the same flat rate should apply to every man accused of similar offense. ICHEOKU is not saying to suffer the Democratic Party's presidential candidate Joe Biden, only that the sexual assault allegation against him by Tara Reade be similarly investigated and subjected to the microscope as was done in Weinstein and Kavanaugh's cases. What is good for the goose should also be good for the gander as justice and fairness demands equal measure. The same treatment should be meted out to every man against whom such allegation has been leveled because so many men in the past have paid a hefty price as a result of such allegation. Therefore it should not and cannot just stop now because the Democratic Party's presidential candidate, Joe Biden, was implicated.
ICHEOKU says American people have heard earful during the past years about the need to believe all women, including from one Hawaii Congresswoman who publicly scolded American men to shut up and man up and accept the fact that women always tell the truth about their sexual assault experiences. The #MeToo movement from hell has been in the fore front of this vagina crusade against men for some time now but seem to have gone into shelter in place quarantine over the Joe Biden's case. They have gone radio silent and you wonder whether Ms Tara Reade's womanhood is not legitimate or that Joe Biden is too sacred to be similarly sacrificed. The #MeToo movement have even levied maximum protest against some accused men even on occasions when it was obvious that certain peculiarities in the circumstances of the alleged assault made it questionable. But they disregarded it and fervently powered on with their believe all women fighting cry.
What the #MeToo movement did to some men literary equates to social lynching and some men's lives were forever upended. Many accused men lost their jobs, some were forced to resign their appointments and many others are in prison today serving long prison sentences as a result. So many others have been forced into hiding, excommunicated by their families and friends because the #MeToo movement demanded their heads on a platter for some indiscretion or unintended violations of so many decades past. They have amassed such influence and power over men that it has become somewhat institutionalized in America now that once accused, the man is automatically presumed guilty and sometimes does not even need bothering to prove his innocence. So, why is the latest accused man, Joe Biden, still walking scot-free and without the baying teeth of the #MeToo rabid hounds biting off his flesh and crushing his bones. They did it to Kavanaugh and Weinstein, why not Biden?
The mantra 'BELIEVE ALL WOMEN" should be a one cap fits all; an equal opportunity treatment to every sexual misconduct allegation against men. It should be of such general application that every woman who makes such allegation should be believed or at least heard out, regardless. But it seems that as with Joe Biden, this hitherto standard rule has been infected with the great contagion of political correctness. The Believe All Women's #MeToo code of principle is now malleable and can be subjugated to a different scrutiny due to who was implicated. Apparently, it seems that it is simply a tool of choice in the hands of these nut job women and their invoking it depends on who the woman making the allegation is and of course, who the offending man is, their various political leanings factored in.
Why should Justice Brett Kavanaugh and Harvey Weinstein be treated like ravenous monsters but Joe Biden is being cuddled like a harmless pet dove. The same people who nearly lynched Justice Kavanaugh and Harvey Weinstein over similar allegations are the same people who are either not answering questions about the Tara Reade accusation or decided that their Joe Biden can do no wrong and did not do what was alleged. A matter made more painful because Joe Biden's own misconduct seems to have more collaboration than the other two men, yet it is receiving little attention in the media and among within other various protect women groups such as the radical #MeToo anarchists. It is also noteworthy that these people never gave the other two men, particularly Justice Brett Kavanuagh a benefit of the doubt but they are now cutting slacks to Joe Biden.
ICHEOKU is not a hardliner nor a political leftist or rightist; and ordinarily would not have cared if their meet was consensual as they were both adults when the alleged incident took place. But the victim, Tara Reade, has cried out about what Joe Biden did to her several decades ago, although very old, but in the interest of fairness to what Justice Kavanaugh was made to go through, the Joe Biden's incident should also be seriously investigated. Her allegation has been collaborated by her mother from the grave through Larry King show, past recollections of a brother and a neighbor all of which made it more likely than not it happened. Joe Biden's fading memory possibly tampered with his own recollection and told him differently, hence his inability to remember the incident and subsequent denial. There was no collaboration in the Justice Brett Kavanaugh's incident and he emphatically denied it, yet he was harangued by the other side, people who pretended that their love for women fired them on. ICHEOKU says is Tara Reade not a woman or do they love her less, otherwise why is Joe Biden being protected and shielded.
It is a well known fact that Joe Biden loves women. It is also well known that he publicly touches them, caresses them, kisses them, tickles them and intimately hugs them and there are so many pictorial evidence to this effect. This also collaborates that there is a high probability that Joe Biden was enamored by the allure of his beautiful 29 old assistant, who managed interns working for him in 1993 and put a move on her as she alleges. According to Tara Reade, she filed a contemporaneous report about the incident to the Senate Personnel Office, told her mother, brother and a neighbor about it. She was retaliated against, fired from her job and told to go find another job because she was not a right "fit" for the job, since presumably, the job requires someone who would not mind being ravaged by a horny dog masquerading as a politician. According to her, she was delivering a duffel bag to Joe Biden in a gym, when he cornered her in a private hallway, pinned her against the wall, kissed her, propositioned her and fingered her.
It is also instructive that Tara Reade also worked for Leone Panetta but had no similar experience or complain against him. She also could not have made the Joe Biden complaint lightly, being a lifelong Democrat and would not have any ulterior motive to try and bring down her party's presidential candidate. The only nagging problem with her narration is how a 29 year old woman would forget some pivotal facts about an incident which should have left an indelible impression in her memory, such as where exactly the unwanted touching took place and the time of the day it occurred. This two things are important because it will throw more light on how the hallway would be so free of people that Joe Biden did not mind being caught or seen by other passers by. Also, she did not shout, scream of push him away following the first move to pin her down before kissing her, then reaching underneath her underwear to touch her vagina. But hey, we should believe all women and Tara Reade is a woman.
The main gist of this article is why the media is not similarly impassioned with telling the Joe Biden's sexual assault allegation story as they were with Justice Brett Kavanaugh and Harvey Weinstein, two people they publicly lynched for alleged sexual misconducts. Unfortunately, it seems that the charter establishing the #MeToo movement does not have a provision of equal protection of every victim woman, otherwise Joe Biden would have since been forced to satisfactorily explain what happened or at least tell his side of the story; and either apologize or call Tara Reade a liar to her face and also explain away all the circumstantial collaborating evidence. But thankfully, the Democratic Party's presidential candidate has finally agreed to tell his side of the story after previously stonewalling by general denial.
ICHEOKU is looking forward to what Joe Biden will say in retort and paraphrasing Cheryl W. Thompson's, 'ever since the #MeToo movement erupted, Democrats including Biden have been insisting that society should believe women, now they are grappling with what that really means. Lets see if they still believe that society should believe all women when they make allegations of sexual misconduct against men, barring any exception known as the Joe Biden exclusion rule.
No comments:
Post a Comment