ICHEOKU says it does not matter what the women later alleged, the state of mind of the accused person and now convicted felon, at the time of the sexual contacts, is imperative. Did Harvey Weinstein indeed truly believe that he was raping those women or just having his way with them because of what he had to give them in return, fame and fortune in Hollywood.
This should have been the controlling authority and not what some nut jobs loose women later alleged took place, especially after reaping the promised benefits which accrued to them as a result of their saying yes, even if implied. They had a choice to reject his offers and advances and walk away, but they didn't, as the allure of fame and fortune too tempting that it overwhelmed their will of resistance. What was the parties mood during the sexual contacts, did they object and complain or were they cordial, believing that their giving in to what Harvey wants, would in return and did in fact greatly improve their odds in Hollywood.
Now, a man is given 23 years prison sentence because of what he honestly thought and sincerely believed was a side show, extra marital affairs he was having with women he bequeathed fame and fortune in Hollywood. Going forward, should men make women to first sign a consent form before having sex with them to avoid such a change of story later. ICHEOKU says why can't men be believed as well or should Bill Clinton now be similarly put away for what he did to Monica Lewinsky just because Monica said he raped her?
What protection do men have against women who manufacture stories or changed heir minds after sex. Mike Tyson suffered similar consequence for having sex with Desiree Washington who came over to his hotel suite in skimpy see though lingerie and so late in the night, yet she was believed when she alleged rape. When will men rise up in defense of themselves or will they just lay supine in surrender as this vendetta seeking mean gals Me Too machine grinds them all up.
Unlike Bill Cosby who in fact raped his victim-women using date rape drugs and got ten years, why is Harvey Weinstein being so excessively punished with such a lengthy prison sentence of 23 years and he did not drug any person. How can 23 years in prison for having sex which one party considered consensual and which one party now alleged was rape be a "fair and just punishment?" Isn't the accused entitled to the same right to fair hearing which prohibits cruel and unjust punishment, just like the victims have the right to have the crimes against them investigated and punished.
ICHEOKU says agrees with Donna Rotunno that the sentence was rather ridiculously obscene" and obnoxious. Query, if a sex pervert could get such a very lengthy sentence, how about murderers and child molesters, many of who have gotten less than five years. Is rape under any circumstance a more egregious crime than murder? It is not fair, it is excessive and the injustice done to Harvey Weinstein in this case cries to high heavens. It shows that something else influenced the sentence rather than purely the evidence presented.
ICHEOKU says also agrees with Harvey Weinstein that the Me Too Movement (MTM) has gone off the reservation and that thousands of men are losing their due process in courts which are pandering to these crazy nut jobs. Certainly a worrisome development for the country as a certain dark cloud has gathered on men in America and every one of them now has a bayonet dangling at the back of their necks, ready to hack them down with tales of woes from rape and other sexual offenses.
For just for having sex and they shared wine, caviar and champaign, a man is going away for 23 long years for something his own truth says was a consensual sex between a cheating husband and some grown up ladies, who wanted what the man offered as a quid pro quod and now it is rape? American men, this one is for you to process and strategize a way to fight back, because if they did it to Harvey, they will do it to you. If you keep silent because it was Harvey Weinstein, just remember the admonition of Martin Niemoller. ICHEOKU prays the appellate court will right the injustice in this case and either set Harvey free on compassionate ground for what he has done for society or drastically reduce the sentence to a reasonable period. What a joke wokeism has become which has empowered some nut jobs to needlessly target men for vengeance.
No comments:
Post a Comment