ICHEOKU says it is true, the Deep State is real, alive and well and its tentacles spreads, stretches, straggles and straddles extensively, reaching into every imaginable crevices of our government and its functionaries. It once again showed its ugly face in the DOJ's Inspector General's much awaited and just released report, which made a case of clear bias, but went ahead to state that there was no evidence of bias. It reminds ICHEOKU of the infamous James Comey's exoneration of Queen Crooked Hillary Clinton where he made out a strong case against the wicked Jezebel but then went on to say that no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute on those facts.
It is indeed such an unparalleled obfuscation of facts, to on one hand establish a reasonable basis to prosecute a case and with the other hand, literary yank away the same established basis; leaving so many wondering whether the fix was in before the smoke screen of pretended investigation ever sprang up. At the end, it is the reputation of the United States of America, its Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Department of Justice, as well as the entire American Justice system that will take the hit from the fallout, as the rest of the world could very easily arrive at a conclusion that America might afterall not be the bastion of justice and rule of law which it portrays and might indeed be as corrupt as any other place else.
How can there be a two tier justice for different echelons of people in the society - one for the Clintons and the other for the rest of the American people. How a woman, who destroyed such a large quantity of evidence, was adjudged as not having the necessary mens rea intent to obstruct the investigation, is simply mind boggling; especially when such a woman is a lawyer, once a First Lady, Senator and Secretary of State and is fully seized of the process and procedure governing investigation, law and justice. But James Comey determined her act not to be criminally liable because she had no intent to obstruct the investigation and you wonder how else could an intent be determined but for the facts of her conducts preceding the investigation, which is suggestive that the offender acted in such a way as to hide her activities from the prying eyes of the investigator.
This is America where in hot pursuits, drug dealers for example try to eat or swallow evidence of their criminality and are busted. But a woman who similarly destroyed evidence of her criminality by deleting and bleach washing over 33,000 emails, destroying the hardware cell phones and computers and lap tops as well as iPads in the process is said to lack necessary intent. ICHEOKU says if she had no intent to cover up her crimes, why then did she destroy the evidence and in the irreversible manner she did by additionally bleach washing them. The only explanation is that she intended the contents never to be seen by any third party investigator, because they contain the missing smoking gun which would otherwise have put her away and for a very very long time.
As if that insult on our collective intelligence was not enough, here comes the long awaited IG's report, once again, challenging our ability to discern the truth. By telling Americans that several instances of discovered biases did not amount to evidence of bias is the most inordinate logic ever made. ICHEOKU says it is definitely the IG's version of James Comey's no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute, because there was no evidence of bias on clearly established cases of bias. Simply put, the variance between the road traveled and the destination arrived, is too wide to make any sense as it is both incredulous and incredible and it sucks.
Which other evidence of bias was the Inspector General looking for when a particular top FBI officials numerous text messages showed that he was making every effort to stop a candidate, which he considered idiotic and imbecilic; and swore to stop him and that he will never become president. The logic does not necessarily add up and unless there are some other things which someone is not reading correctly, something is definitely wrong with the conclusion reached, in view of the road traveled to get there.
An FBI with more than 37,000 agents and it was just only a handful, led by Peter Strzok, who were deemed fit and proper to investigate both the Queen Crooked Hillary Clinton's email scandal as well as the Russian Collusion witch-hunt. Something does not seem to add up here; it is evidence of something very fishy; otherwise why personalize both investigations when there are thousands of other also well qualified investigators that could have handled either one of the two investigations.
ICHEOKU says the most plausible inference drawable from this is that it is apparently the same Deep State with its tentacles everywhere that is still at work here. They are working tirelessly to shield everyone of their own and using every willing tool to so do. Such is condemnable and should be condemned by every decent American whose sense of fairness and justice is still intact and not already corrupted or eroded. If it is President Donald John Trump today, who shall the bell toll for tomorrow? How could a report establish that some top FBI officials manifested cases and instances of bias against the then candidate Trump, which continued with later President Donald John Trump, and yet went forth to state that there was no evidence of their bias? What else constitutes bias if not their manifested acts, expressly showing their preference for one of the candidates.
It is simply an inexplicable logic standing on its head and has no basis, both in law and in fact. It is a mirror image of the James Comey infamous exoneration of Queen Crooked Hillary Clinton which enumerated various offenses which she committed but went ahead to reach a weird conclusion that no reasonable prosecutor will bring a charge against her; and you wonder what pathway both guys traveled to reach such various strange conclusions. Regrettable.
No comments:
Post a Comment