Thursday, August 5, 2010
SAME SEX MARRIAGE IN CALIFORNIA, LEGALIZED?
Overruling California's Proposition 8 which de-legitimized same sex marriage, U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker said, 'Prop 8 singles out gays and lesbians and legitimates their unequal treatment.'. Icheoku says why does anybody even care a hoot about who or what anyone chooses to go to bed with or marry? As far as Icheokuis concerned, if one wants to marry his donkey, cat, dog, horse, fish, ape, gorilla, goat etc let him/her carry on. A union is a union and it does not matter with what the person is unionized.
It is ironical that American society which is targeting same sex marriage readily turns a blind eye to heterosexual couples marrying and divorcing several times over like CNN's Larry King? Or like the Mormons who engage in polygamy or the Catholic priests who are deprived of marriage and they surreptitiously engage in illicit molestation of alter boys or people pretending to be happily married while they cheat on their spouses like Bill Clinton's Monica Lewinsky episode. Icheoku says, if only these holier than thou people would heed our Lord Jesus Christ's injunction of 'thou shall not judge' or 'first remove the log in your eyes' teaching then everything will be honky-dory in our America!
To all same sex peoples of this world, welcome to the heartache called marriage. Detractors and gay-rights haters argued the judge ruled as he did because "he is one of them" - a gayman; but would they have rather a heterosexual judge did, leading to the same cries of favoritism. But which judge would have ruled otherwise faced with the mountain of adduced evidence and the fact that both chief law enforcers of California, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and Attorney General Gerry Brown, were not interested in sustaining an apparent injustice and denial of rights ensconced in Prop 8 and chose not defend it. Also the two most visible constitutional lawyers in the United States Theodore Olsen and Boise teamed up to right the wrong wrought by Prop 8; and for those people who don't know who these lawyers are, they represented Bush and Gore respectively during Bush v. Gore 2000 presidential election disputation. They also accused the judge of liberal judicial activism, but luckily enough Judge Vaughan Walker is a conservative Republican, nominated first by President Ronald Reagan and appointed later by President George Hubert Bush Sr. It is also on record that his appointment was vehemently resisted and opposed by the liberal wing of the Democratic party led then by the current Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi.
Further the gay rights bashers argued that marriage presupposes sex, hence copulation is imperative; to which Icheoku answers, it depends on the type of orifice one prefers for copulation as sex could be oral, anal as well as vaginal. They further argued that God's injunction is to 'go and multiply; to which Icheoku answers that not all heterosexual couples have children. Some of them cannot have children either by choice, medical difficulty or impossibility as when the woman is barren or the man is sterile or probably the woman has passed child-bearing age. Additionally, they talked about the natural loving relationship between man and woman; to which Icheoku responds that late Laci Peterson was hacked to death by her husband Scott Peterson while she was carrying their 7 months old baby-boy. Now is that the kind of loving relationship these anarchists prefer?
Also if they are serious about maintaining social morality and viability, why don't they outlaw divorce and force people like CNN Larry King to stay married to just one woman. What about adulterous married men and women; or don't they destroy society's body fabric? Anyway, hopefully the United States Supreme Court will find no reason to reverse this decision, when it eventually makes its way thereto; and let anyone in any sort of relationship, if it suits him or her, marry whomever they prefer; and if Icheoku may stretch their pets if need be. Why not also make it mandatory that there will no longer be single parents or bachelors and spinsters for life? Why not make it mandatory that every Dick, Tom and Harry as well as Diane, Tessy and Harriet must marry. It is all about selectivity of societal norms when it suits them.
Also the issue of marriage or other unions is rather too personal and private for anyone to butt into such other peoples business. But hey, very soon the same-sexes will realize that marriage is what it is - it sucks! It deprives you of your liberties. It hamstrings your life as you be forced to start dealing with situations you would ordinarily have walked away from or out on previously. It will start forcing you to check with another human-being, each time you want to make a financial expenditure or just buy yourself a new toy like an automobile or a 3D television. What about the needless 'lets talk' moments when you least want to expend your saliva and would rather be left alone? What about I did the cooking, you have to do the dishes? What about fighting for remote control or who decides what program to watch? In short what about having to share you space with someone else? Anyway, California Gays, Lesbians and Transgenders welcome to the jungle! May the wedding 'Hell's' bells toll without ceasing and soon and very soon you will discover what the "m" in marriage stands for - M A D N E S S !